Xavier Sáez-Llorens1, Ananda S Bandyopadhyay2, Christopher Gast3, Tirza De Leon4, Rodrigo DeAntonio5, Jose Jimeno6, Maria Isabel Caballero6, Gabriela Aguirre7, M Steven Oberste8, William C Weldon8, Jennifer L Konopka-Anstadt8, John Modlin9, Novilia S Bachtiar10, Alan Fix3, John Konz3, Ralf Clemens11, Sue Ann Costa Clemens12, Ricardo Rüttimann13. 1. Infectious Disease Department, Hospital del Niño Dr José Renán Esquivel, Panama City, Panama; Sistema Nacional de Investigación, Senacyt, Panama. 2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. PATH, Washington DC, USA. 4. Cevaxin, David, Chiriqui, Panama. 5. Sistema Nacional de Investigación, Senacyt, Panama; Cevaxin, Panama City, Panama. 6. VaxTrials, Panama City, Panama. 7. Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries, Miami, FL, USA. 8. Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 9. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA; PATH, Washington DC, USA; Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA. 10. PT Bio Farma, Bandung, Indonesia. 11. Global Research in Infectious Diseases, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 12. Institute for Global Health, Siena University, Siena, Italy. 13. Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: rruttimann@fidec-online.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continued emergence and spread of circulating vaccine-derived type 2 polioviruses and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis from Sabin oral poliovirus vaccines (OPVs) has stimulated development of two novel type 2 OPV candidates (OPV2-c1 and OPV2-c2) designed to have similar immunogenicity, improved genetic stability, and less potential to reacquire neurovirulence. We aimed to assess safety and immunogenicity of the two novel OPV candidates compared with a monovalent Sabin OPV in children and infants. METHODS: We did two single-centre, multi-site, partly-masked, randomised trials in healthy cohorts of children (aged 1-4 years) and infants (aged 18-22 weeks) in Panama: a control phase 4 study with monovalent Sabin OPV2 before global cessation of monovalent OPV2 use, and a phase 2 study with low and high doses of two novel OPV2 candidates. All participants received one OPV2 vaccination and subsets received two doses 28 days apart. Parents reported solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Type 2 poliovirus neutralising antibodies were measured at days 0, 7, 28, and 56, and stool viral shedding was assessed up to 28 days post-vaccination. Primary objectives were to assess safety in all participants and non-inferiority of novel OPV2 day 28 seroprotection versus monovalent OPV2 in infants (non-inferiority margin 10%). These studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02521974 and NCT03554798. FINDINGS: The control study took place between Oct 23, 2015, and April 29, 2016, and the subsequent phase 2 study between Sept 19, 2018, and Sept 30, 2019. 150 children (50 in the control study and 100 of 129 assessed for eligibility in the novel OPV2 study) and 684 infants (110 of 114 assessed for eligibility in the control study and 574 of 684 assessed for eligibility in the novel OPV2 study) were enrolled and received at least one study vaccination. Vaccinations were safe and well tolerated with no causally associated serious adverse events or important medical events in any group. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were overwhelmingly mild or moderate irrespective of vaccine or dose. Nearly all children were seroprotected at baseline, indicating high baseline immunity. In children, the seroprotection rate 28 days after one dose was 100% for monovalent OPV2 and both novel OPV2 candidates. In infants at day 28, 91 (94% [95% CI 87-98]) of 97 were seroprotected after receiving monovalent OPV2, 134 (94% [88-97]) of 143 after high-dose novel OPV2-c1, 122 (93% [87-97]) of 131 after low-dose novel OPV2-c1, 138 (95% [90-98]) of 146 after high-dose novel OPV2-c2, and 115 (91% [84-95]) of 127 after low-dose novel OPV2-c2. Non-inferiority was shown for low-dose and high-dose novel OPV2-c1 and high-dose novel OPV2-c2 despite monovalent OPV2 recipients having higher baseline immunity. INTERPRETATION: Both novel OPV2 candidates were safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in children and infants. Novel OPV2 could be an important addition to our resources against poliovirus given the current epidemiological situation. FUNDING: Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
BACKGROUND: Continued emergence and spread of circulating vaccine-derived type 2 polioviruses and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis from Sabin oral poliovirus vaccines (OPVs) has stimulated development of two novel type 2 OPV candidates (OPV2-c1 and OPV2-c2) designed to have similar immunogenicity, improved genetic stability, and less potential to reacquire neurovirulence. We aimed to assess safety and immunogenicity of the two novel OPV candidates compared with a monovalent Sabin OPV in children and infants. METHODS: We did two single-centre, multi-site, partly-masked, randomised trials in healthy cohorts of children (aged 1-4 years) and infants (aged 18-22 weeks) in Panama: a control phase 4 study with monovalent Sabin OPV2 before global cessation of monovalent OPV2 use, and a phase 2 study with low and high doses of two novel OPV2 candidates. All participants received one OPV2 vaccination and subsets received two doses 28 days apart. Parents reported solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Type 2 poliovirus neutralising antibodies were measured at days 0, 7, 28, and 56, and stool viral shedding was assessed up to 28 days post-vaccination. Primary objectives were to assess safety in all participants and non-inferiority of novel OPV2 day 28 seroprotection versus monovalent OPV2 in infants (non-inferiority margin 10%). These studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02521974 and NCT03554798. FINDINGS: The control study took place between Oct 23, 2015, and April 29, 2016, and the subsequent phase 2 study between Sept 19, 2018, and Sept 30, 2019. 150 children (50 in the control study and 100 of 129 assessed for eligibility in the novel OPV2 study) and 684 infants (110 of 114 assessed for eligibility in the control study and 574 of 684 assessed for eligibility in the novel OPV2 study) were enrolled and received at least one study vaccination. Vaccinations were safe and well tolerated with no causally associated serious adverse events or important medical events in any group. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were overwhelmingly mild or moderate irrespective of vaccine or dose. Nearly all children were seroprotected at baseline, indicating high baseline immunity. In children, the seroprotection rate 28 days after one dose was 100% for monovalent OPV2 and both novel OPV2 candidates. In infants at day 28, 91 (94% [95% CI 87-98]) of 97 were seroprotected after receiving monovalent OPV2, 134 (94% [88-97]) of 143 after high-dose novel OPV2-c1, 122 (93% [87-97]) of 131 after low-dose novel OPV2-c1, 138 (95% [90-98]) of 146 after high-dose novel OPV2-c2, and 115 (91% [84-95]) of 127 after low-dose novel OPV2-c2. Non-inferiority was shown for low-dose and high-dose novel OPV2-c1 and high-dose novel OPV2-c2 despite monovalent OPV2 recipients having higher baseline immunity. INTERPRETATION: Both novel OPV2 candidates were safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in children and infants. Novel OPV2 could be an important addition to our resources against poliovirus given the current epidemiological situation. FUNDING: Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Authors: Stephen Jarrett; Sonia Pagliusi; Rachel Park; Taufik Wilmansyah; Suresh Jadhav; Patricia Correa Santana; K R Krishnamurthy; Lingjiang Yang Journal: Vaccine X Date: 2021-10-20
Authors: Robert K M Choy; A Louis Bourgeois; Christian F Ockenhouse; Richard I Walker; Rebecca L Sheets; Jorge Flores Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 50.129
Authors: Ilse De Coster; Isabel Leroux-Roels; Ananda S Bandyopadhyay; Christopher Gast; Kanchanamala Withanage; Katie Steenackers; Philippe De Smedt; Annelies Aerssens; Geert Leroux-Roels; M Steven Oberste; Jennifer L Konopka-Anstadt; William C Weldon; Alan Fix; John Konz; Rahnuma Wahid; John Modlin; Ralf Clemens; Sue Ann Costa Clemens; Novilia S Bachtiar; Pierre Van Damme Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Laura V Cooper; Ananda S Bandyopadhyay; Nicksy Gumede; Ondrej Mach; Pascal Mkanda; Modjirom Ndoutabé; Samuel O Okiror; Alejandro Ramirez-Gonzalez; Kebba Touray; Sarah Wanyoike; Nicholas C Grassly; Isobel M Blake Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Rahnuma Wahid; Laina Mercer; Chris Gast; Tirza De Leon; Xavier Sáez-Llorens; Alan Fix; Andrew Macadam; Laura Stephens; Konstantin Chumakov; Saskia L Smits; Marta Murreddu; Jennifer L Konopka-Anstadt; M Steven Oberste; Cara C Burns; Raul Andino; Novilia Sjafri Bachtiar; Erman Tritama; Ananda S Bandyopadhyay; Gabriela Aguirre; Ricardo Rüttimann; John O Konz Journal: NPJ Vaccines Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 7.344
Authors: John O Konz; Tim Schofield; Sarah Carlyle; Rahnuma Wahid; Azeem Ansari; Jeroen R P M Strating; Ming Te Yeh; Hasmik Manukyan; Saskia L Smits; Erman Tritama; Latri Rahmah; Dori Ugiyadi; Raul Andino; Majid Laassri; Konstantin Chumakov; Andrew Macadam Journal: Vaccine X Date: 2021-06-11
Authors: Ruth I Connor; Elizabeth B Brickley; Wendy F Wieland-Alter; Margaret E Ackerman; Joshua A Weiner; John F Modlin; Ananda S Bandyopadhyay; Peter F Wright Journal: Mucosal Immunol Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 7.313