Fiona Imlach1, Eileen McKinlay2, Lesley Middleton3, Jonathan Kennedy2, Megan Pledger3, Lynne Russell3, Marianna Churchward3, Jacqueline Cumming3, Karen McBride-Henry3. 1. Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Old Government Building, 55 Lambton Quay, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand. fiona.imlach@vuw.ac.nz. 2. Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, 23 Mein Street, Newtown, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand. 3. Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Old Government Building, 55 Lambton Quay, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the first COVID-19 pandemic 'lockdown' in Aotearoa/New Zealand (March-May 2020, in which strict 'stay at home' measures were introduced), general practices were advised to use telephone and video consultations (telehealth) wherever possible instead of the usual in-person visits. This was a sudden change for most practices and patients. This research aimed to explore how patients accessed general practice during lockdown and evaluate their experiences with telehealth, to inform how telehealth could be most effectively used in the future. METHODS: Using a mixed-method approach, we undertook an online survey and in-depth interviews with adults (> 18 years) who had contact with practices during lockdown, recruited through social media and email lists. We present descriptive statistics from the survey data (n = 1010) and qualitative analysis of interview data (n = 38) and open-ended survey questions, using a framework of access to health care, from the patient's perspective. RESULTS: In general, patients reported high satisfaction with telehealth in general practice during lockdown. Telehealth was convenient and allowed patients to safely access health care without having to weigh-up the fear of COVID-19 infection against the need to be seen. Telehealth worked best for routine and familiar health issues and when rapport was established between patients and clinicians. This was easier with a pre-existing clinical relationship, but not impossible without one. Telehealth was less suitable when a physical examination was needed, when the diagnosis was unknown or for patients who had a strong preference to be seen in-person. CONCLUSIONS: Even in this disruptive lockdown period, that prompted an unexpected and rapid implementation of telehealth services in general practices, most patients had positive experiences with telehealth. In the future, patients want the choice of consultation type to match their needs, circumstances, and preferences. Technological issues and funding barriers may need to be addressed, and clear communication for both patients and clinicians is needed about key aspects of telehealth (e.g. cost, appropriateness, privacy). Maintaining telehealth as an option post-lockdown has the potential to increase timely and safe access to primary health care for many patients.
BACKGROUND: During the first COVID-19 pandemic 'lockdown' in Aotearoa/New Zealand (March-May 2020, in which strict 'stay at home' measures were introduced), general practices were advised to use telephone and video consultations (telehealth) wherever possible instead of the usual in-person visits. This was a sudden change for most practices and patients. This research aimed to explore how patients accessed general practice during lockdown and evaluate their experiences with telehealth, to inform how telehealth could be most effectively used in the future. METHODS: Using a mixed-method approach, we undertook an online survey and in-depth interviews with adults (> 18 years) who had contact with practices during lockdown, recruited through social media and email lists. We present descriptive statistics from the survey data (n = 1010) and qualitative analysis of interview data (n = 38) and open-ended survey questions, using a framework of access to health care, from the patient's perspective. RESULTS: In general, patients reported high satisfaction with telehealth in general practice during lockdown. Telehealth was convenient and allowed patients to safely access health care without having to weigh-up the fear of COVID-19infection against the need to be seen. Telehealth worked best for routine and familiar health issues and when rapport was established between patients and clinicians. This was easier with a pre-existing clinical relationship, but not impossible without one. Telehealth was less suitable when a physical examination was needed, when the diagnosis was unknown or for patients who had a strong preference to be seen in-person. CONCLUSIONS: Even in this disruptive lockdown period, that prompted an unexpected and rapid implementation of telehealth services in general practices, most patientshad positive experiences with telehealth. In the future, patients want the choice of consultation type to match their needs, circumstances, and preferences. Technological issues and funding barriers may need to be addressed, and clear communication for both patients and clinicians is needed about key aspects of telehealth (e.g. cost, appropriateness, privacy). Maintaining telehealth as an option post-lockdown has the potential to increase timely and safe access to primary health care for many patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Delivery of health care; Pandemic; Patient experience; Patient-centred care; Primary health care; Telemedicine
Authors: Julian Scherer; David A Back; Friedrich Thienemann; Ernest Kaufmann; Valentin Neuhaus; Christian Willy; Pierre Hepp; Hans-Christoph Pape; Georg Osterhoff Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 2.374
Authors: Rodrigo Jover; Juan Clofent; Félix de Vera; Antonio López-Serrano; Ana Gutiérrez; Mariam Aguas; Pilar Nos Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Valle Coronado-Vázquez; Maria Del Valle Ramírez-Durán; Juan Gómez-Salgado; María Silvia Dorado-Rabaneda; Elena Benito-Alonso; Marina Holgado-Juan; Cristina Bronchalo-González Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2021-05-24