Literature DB >> 33308068

Comparing the phenomenological qualities of stimulus-independent thought, stimulus-dependent thought and dreams using experience sampling.

M E Gross1, A P Smith2, Y M Graveline3, R E Beaty3, J W Schooler1, P Seli2.   

Abstract

Humans spend a considerable portion of their lives engaged in 'stimulus-independent thoughts' (SIT), or mental activity that occurs independently of input from the immediate external environment. Although such SITs are, by definition, different from thoughts that are driven by stimuli in one's external environment (i.e. stimulus-dependent thoughts; SDTs), at times, the phenomenology of these two types of thought appears to be deceptively similar. But how similar are they? We address this question by comparing the content of two types of SIT (dreaming and waking SITs) with the content of SDTs. In this 7 day, smartphone-based experience-sampling procedure, participants were intermittently probed during the day and night to indicate whether their current thoughts were stimulus dependent or stimulus independent. They then responded to content-based items indexing the qualitative aspects of their experience (e.g. My thoughts were jumping from topic to topic). Results indicate substantial distinctiveness between these three types of thought: significant differences between at least two of the three mental states were found across every measured variable. Implications are discussed. This article is part of the theme issue 'Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dreams; experience sampling; mind wandering; stimulus-dependent thought; stimulus-independent thought

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33308068      PMCID: PMC7741088          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  34 in total

1.  Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Jonathan W Schooler; David J Turk; Sheila J Cunningham; Phebe Burns; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2011-01-31

Review 2.  The restless mind.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  REM, not incubation, improves creativity by priming associative networks.

Authors:  Denise J Cai; Sarnoff A Mednick; Elizabeth M Harrison; Jennifer C Kanady; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Episodic simulation of future events: concepts, data, and applications.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  The proactive brain: memory for predictions.

Authors:  Moshe Bar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  A paradigm shift in functional brain imaging.

Authors:  Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind.

Authors:  Jonathan W Schooler; Jonathan Smallwood; Kalina Christoff; Todd C Handy; Erik D Reichle; Michael A Sayette
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Mind-wandering: phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method.

Authors:  David Stawarczyk; Steve Majerus; Michalina Maj; Martial Van der Linden; Arnaud D'Argembeau
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-02-23

9.  Back to the future: autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering.

Authors:  Benjamin Baird; Jonathan Smallwood; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2011-09-13

10.  Representing Representation: Integration between the Temporal Lobe and the Posterior Cingulate Influences the Content and Form of Spontaneous Thought.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Theodoros Karapanagiotidis; Florence Ruby; Barbara Medea; Irene de Caso; Mahiko Konishi; Hao-Ting Wang; Glyn Hallam; Daniel S Margulies; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Offline perception: an introduction.

Authors:  Peter Fazekas; Bence Nanay; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Episodic thought distinguishes spontaneous cognition in waking from REM and NREM sleep.

Authors:  Benjamin Baird; Mariel Kalkach Aparicio; Tariq Alauddin; Brady Riedner; Melanie Boly; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2021-12-02

3.  Dreaming of the sleep lab.

Authors:  Claudia Picard-Deland; Tore Nielsen; Michelle Carr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.