Maria Del C Valdés Hernández1,2, Keith Smith3,4, Mark E Bastin1, E Nicole Amft5, Stuart H Ralston6, Joanna M Wardlaw1,2, Stewart J Wiseman1,2. 1. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 2. UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 3. Usher Institute for Population Health Science and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 4. Health Data Research UK, London, UK. 5. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK. 6. Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This work investigates network organisation of brain structural connectivity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) relative to healthy controls and its putative association with lesion distribution and disease indicators. METHODS: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) segmentation and connectomics were performed in 47 patients with SLE and 47 healthy age-matched controls from structural and diffusion MRI data. Network nodes were divided into hierarchical tiers based on numbers of connections. Results were compared between patients and controls to assess for differences in brain network organisation. Voxel-based analyses of the spatial distribution of WMH in relation to network measures and SLE disease indicators were conducted. RESULTS: Despite inter-individual differences in brain network organization observed across the study sample, the connectome networks of SLE patients had larger proportion of connections in the peripheral nodes. SLE patients had statistically larger numbers of links in their networks with generally larger fractional anisotropy weights (i.e. a measure of white matter integrity) and less tendency to aggregate than those of healthy controls. The voxels exhibiting connectomic differences were coincident with WMH clusters, particularly the left hemisphere's intersection between the anterior limb of the internal and external capsules. Moreover, these voxels also associated more strongly with disease indicators. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate network differences reflective of compensatory reorganization of the neural circuits, reflecting adaptive or extended neuroplasticity in SLE.
OBJECTIVE: This work investigates network organisation of brain structural connectivity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) relative to healthy controls and its putative association with lesion distribution and disease indicators. METHODS: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) segmentation and connectomics were performed in 47 patients with SLE and 47 healthy age-matched controls from structural and diffusion MRI data. Network nodes were divided into hierarchical tiers based on numbers of connections. Results were compared between patients and controls to assess for differences in brain network organisation. Voxel-based analyses of the spatial distribution of WMH in relation to network measures and SLE disease indicators were conducted. RESULTS: Despite inter-individual differences in brain network organization observed across the study sample, the connectome networks of SLEpatients had larger proportion of connections in the peripheral nodes. SLEpatients had statistically larger numbers of links in their networks with generally larger fractional anisotropy weights (i.e. a measure of white matter integrity) and less tendency to aggregate than those of healthy controls. The voxels exhibiting connectomic differences were coincident with WMH clusters, particularly the left hemisphere's intersection between the anterior limb of the internal and external capsules. Moreover, these voxels also associated more strongly with disease indicators. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate network differences reflective of compensatory reorganization of the neural circuits, reflecting adaptive or extended neuroplasticity in SLE.
Authors: T E J Behrens; M W Woolrich; M Jenkinson; H Johansen-Berg; R G Nunes; S Clare; P M Matthews; J M Brady; S M Smith Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: D D Gladman; C H Goldsmith; M B Urowitz; P Bacon; P Fortin; E Ginzler; C Gordon; J G Hanly; D A Isenberg; M Petri; O Nived; M Snaith; G Sturfelt Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: David A Dickie; Shadia Mikhael; Dominic E Job; Joanna M Wardlaw; David H Laidlaw; Mark E Bastin Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Anil M Tuladhar; Anouk G W van Norden; Karlijn F de Laat; Marcel P Zwiers; Ewoud J van Dijk; David G Norris; Frank-Erik de Leeuw Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke; Patricia Cagnoli; Page Wang; Thomas Schultz; Anne Lotz; William J Mccune; Pia C Sundgren Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 4.881