Heather H Keller1, Sarah A Wu2, Maryam Iraniparast2, Vanessa Trinca2, Jill Morrison-Koechl2, Sarah Awwad2. 1. Schlegel-University of Waterloo Research Institute for Aging, Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: hkeller@uwaterloo.ca. 2. Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Mealtimes in residential care tend to be task-focused rather than relationship-centered, impacting resident quality of life. CHOICE+ uses participatory approaches to make mealtimes more relationship-centered. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of the 12-month external-facilitated implementation of CHOICE+ to improve the mealtime environment. DESIGN: Modified stepped-wedge time series design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Dining rooms in 3 homes were entered into the intervention every 4 months; total study length was 20 months. Pre- and postintervention evaluations were attained from residents (n = 27, n = 19) and staff (n = 39, n = 29) respectively. METHODS: Five meals in each home were observed by a blinded trained assessor every 4 months using the Mealtime Scan+ to assess physical, social, and relationship-centered practices and overall quality of the dining environment. Repeated measures analysis determined change in mealtime environment scores. The Team member Mealtime Experience Questionnaire and 5 questions from the InterRAI Quality of Life Questionnaire for residents and family were administered at pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: There were significant increases in physical and social environments, relationship-centered care practices, and overall quality of the mealtime environment during the intervention period at all sites (all P < .001) and significant site by intervention interactions for physical (P = .01) and relationship-centered care (P = .03). Statistically significant site differences were noted for relationship-centered care practices (P < .001) and overall quality of the dining environment (P < .002). There was no significant difference in staff and resident/family pre-/postintervention questionnaire results. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The external facilitated model of CHOICE+ resulted in significant improvements in the mealtime environment. Although site context impacted implementation, this study demonstrates that mealtimes can be improved even in homes that have challenges. Future work should determine impact of these improvements on other outcomes such as resident quality of life, using more specific measures.
OBJECTIVES: Mealtimes in residential care tend to be task-focused rather than relationship-centered, impacting resident quality of life. CHOICE+ uses participatory approaches to make mealtimes more relationship-centered. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of the 12-month external-facilitated implementation of CHOICE+ to improve the mealtime environment. DESIGN: Modified stepped-wedge time series design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Dining rooms in 3 homes were entered into the intervention every 4 months; total study length was 20 months. Pre- and postintervention evaluations were attained from residents (n = 27, n = 19) and staff (n = 39, n = 29) respectively. METHODS: Five meals in each home were observed by a blinded trained assessor every 4 months using the Mealtime Scan+ to assess physical, social, and relationship-centered practices and overall quality of the dining environment. Repeated measures analysis determined change in mealtime environment scores. The Team member Mealtime Experience Questionnaire and 5 questions from the InterRAI Quality of Life Questionnaire for residents and family were administered at pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: There were significant increases in physical and social environments, relationship-centered care practices, and overall quality of the mealtime environment during the intervention period at all sites (all P < .001) and significant site by intervention interactions for physical (P = .01) and relationship-centered care (P = .03). Statistically significant site differences were noted for relationship-centered care practices (P < .001) and overall quality of the dining environment (P < .002). There was no significant difference in staff and resident/family pre-/postintervention questionnaire results. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The external facilitated model of CHOICE+ resulted in significant improvements in the mealtime environment. Although site context impacted implementation, this study demonstrates that mealtimes can be improved even in homes that have challenges. Future work should determine impact of these improvements on other outcomes such as resident quality of life, using more specific measures.