| Literature DB >> 33306994 |
Mario Herrero1, Philip K Thornton2, Daniel Mason-D'Croz3, Jeda Palmer3, Benjamin L Bodirsky4, Prajal Pradhan4, Christopher B Barrett5, Tim G Benton6, Andrew Hall7, Ilje Pikaar8, Jessica R Bogard3, Graham D Bonnett3, Brett A Bryan9, Bruce M Campbell10, Svend Christensen11, Michael Clark12, Jessica Fanzo13, Cecile M Godde3, Andy Jarvis14, Ana Maria Loboguerrero14, Alexander Mathys15, C Lynne McIntyre3, Rosamond L Naylor16, Rebecca Nelson5, Michael Obersteiner17, Alejandro Parodi18, Alexander Popp4, Katie Ricketts7, Pete Smith19, Hugo Valin20, Sonja J Vermeulen21, Joost Vervoort22, Mark van Wijk23, Hannah He van Zanten24, Paul C West25, Stephen A Wood26, Johan Rockström27.
Abstract
Food system innovations will be instrumental to achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, major innovation breakthroughs can trigger profound and disruptive changes, leading to simultaneous and interlinked reconfigurations of multiple parts of the global food system. The emergence of new technologies or social solutions, therefore, have very different impact profiles, with favourable consequences for some SDGs and unintended adverse side-effects for others. Stand-alone innovations seldom achieve positive outcomes over multiple sustainability dimensions. Instead, they should be embedded as part of systemic changes that facilitate the implementation of the SDGs. Emerging trade-offs need to be intentionally addressed to achieve true sustainability, particularly those involving social aspects like inequality in its many forms, social justice, and strong institutions, which remain challenging. Trade-offs with undesirable consequences are manageable through the development of well planned transition pathways, careful monitoring of key indicators, and through the implementation of transparent science targets at the local level.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33306994 DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30277-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Planet Health ISSN: 2542-5196