Literature DB >> 33306749

Microfluidics and organ-on-a-chip technologies: A systematic review of the methods used to mimic bone marrow.

Gabriel Santos Rosalem1, Libardo Andrés Gonzáles Torres2, Estevam Barbosa de Las Casas3, Fernando Augusto Siqueira Mathias4, Jeronimo Conceição Ruiz4,5, Maria Gabriela Reis Carvalho4.   

Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) is an organ responsible for crucial processes in living organs, e. g., hematopoiesis. In recent years, Organ-on-a-Chip (OoC) devices have been used to satisfy the need for in vitro systems that better mimic the phenomena occurring in the BM microenvironment. Given the growing interest in these systems and the diversity of developed devices, an integrative systematic literature review is required. We have performed this review, following the PRISMA method aiming to identify the main characteristics and assess the effectiveness of the devices that were developed to represent the BM. A search was performed in the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Science Direct databases using the keywords (("bone marrow" OR "hematopoietic stem cells" OR "haematopoietic stem cells") AND ("organ in a" OR "lab on a chip" OR "microfluidic" OR "microfluidic*" OR ("bioreactor" AND "microfluidic*"))). Original research articles published between 2009 and 2020 were included in the review, giving a total of 21 papers. The analysis of these papers showed that their main purpose was to study BM cells biology, mimic BM niches, model pathological BM, and run drug assays. Regarding the fabrication protocols, we have observed that polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) material and soft lithography method were the most commonly used. To reproduce the microenvironment of BM, most devices used the type I collagen and alginate. Peristaltic and syringe pumps were mostly used for device perfusion. Regarding the advantages compared to conventional methods, there were identified three groups of OoC devices: perfused 3D BM; co-cultured 3D BM; and perfused co-cultured 3D BM. Cellular behavior and mimicking their processes and responses were the mostly commonly studied parameters. The results have demonstrated the effectiveness of OoC devices for research purposes compared to conventional cell cultures. Furthermore, the devices have a wide range of applicability and the potential to be explored.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33306749     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

1.  Modelling acute myeloid leukemia (AML): What's new? A transition from the classical to the modern.

Authors:  Annachiara Dozzo; Aoife Galvin; Jae-Won Shin; Santo Scalia; Caitriona M O'Driscoll; Katie B Ryan
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.671

Review 2.  The Mesenchymal Niche in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Chloé Friedrich; Olivier Kosmider
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 3.  Advancing Key Gaps in the Knowledge of Plasmodium vivax Cryptic Infections Using Humanized Mouse Models and Organs-on-Chips.

Authors:  Iris Aparici Herraiz; Hugo R Caires; Óscar Castillo-Fernández; Núria Sima; Lourdes Méndez-Mora; Ruth M Risueño; Jetsumon Sattabongkot; Wanlapa Roobsoong; Aurora Hernández-Machado; Carmen Fernandez-Becerra; Cristina C Barrias; Hernando A Del Portillo
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.073

Review 4.  Organoids and microphysiological systems: Promising models for accelerating AAV gene therapy studies.

Authors:  Ritu Mahesh Ramamurthy; Anthony Atala; Christopher D Porada; Graҫa Almeida-Porada
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 8.786

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.