| Literature DB >> 33304842 |
P R Yaashikaa1, P Senthil Kumar1,2, Sunita Varjani3, A Saravanan4.
Abstract
There is an upsurge enthusiasm for utilizing biochar produced from waste-biomass in different fields, to address the most important ecological issues. This review is focused on an overview of remediating harmful contaminants utilizing biochar. Production of biochar utilizing various systems has been discussed. Biochar has received the consideration of numerous analysts in building up their proficiency to remediate contaminants. Process parameters are fundamentally answerable for deciding the yield of biomass. Biochar derived from biomass is an exceptionally rich wellspring of carbon produced from biomass utilizing thermal combustion. Activating biochar is another particular region for the growing utilization of biochar for expelling specific contaminations. Closed-loop systems to produce biochar creates more opportunities. Decentralized biochar production techniques serve as an effective way of providing employment opportunities, managing wastes, increasing resource proficiency in circular bioeconomy. This paper also covers knowledge gaps and perspectives in the field of remediation of toxic pollutants using biochar.Entities:
Keywords: Biochar; Carbon sequestration; Circular bioeconomy; Pollutants removal; Production techniques
Year: 2020 PMID: 33304842 PMCID: PMC7718465 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Thermochemical conversion techniques and their process conditions.
| Technique | Temperature (°C) | Residence time | Yield of biochar (%) | Yield of bio-oil (%) | Syngas production (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrolysis | 300−700 (slow) | < 2 s (slow) | 35 (slow) | 30 (slow) | 35 (slow) | [ |
| 500−1000 (fast) | 13 (fast) | |||||
| Hour-day (fast) | 12 (fast) | 75 (fast) | ||||
| Hydrothermal carbonization | 180−300 | 1−16 h | 50−80 | 5−20 | 2−5 | [ |
| Gasification | 750−900 | 10−20 s | 10 | 5 | 85 | [ |
| Torrefaction | 290 | 10−60 min | 80 | 0 | 20 | [ |
| Flash carbonization | 300−600 | < 30 min | 37 | -- | -- | [ |
Fig. 1Mechanism of pyrolysis.
Fig. 2Hydrothermal carbonization procedure.
Fig. 3Process of gasification.
Fig. 4Steps involved in torrefaction process.
Fig. 5Physicochemical, surface and structural characterization of biochar.
Advantages and limitations of different applications of biochar.
| Applications | Aim | Benefits | Limitations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst | Act as supporting materials for direct catalysis | Low cost, more functional groups, large surface area | Efficiency may be less | [ |
| Energy storage | Utilizing as electrode materials | Low cost, highly porous, large surface area | Performance is low | [ |
| Soil amendment | Enhancing soil fertility and quality and carbon sequestration | Low cost, minimize emission of greenhouse gases, helps to retain nutrients and water, controls nutrient loss | Contamination of heavy metals and poly aromatic hydrocarbons may persist | [ |
| Adsorbents | Removal of organic and inorganic pollutants in soil and aqueous system | Low cost and more oxygen groups present in biochar enhances adsorption of pollutants | Removal efficiency of pollutants is undetermined and heavy metals retains in soil | [ |
| Composting | Improving structure of microbial population and carbon mineralization | Porous, reducing emission of greenhouse gases, large surface area and retains nutrients | There may be chance of heavy metals and other contaminants invading into soil | [ |
Pollutants removal mechanism by various biomass.
| Biomass | Pollutants | Pyrolytic temperature (ºC) | pH | Mechanism | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bamboo | Fuel oil | 700 | 7.0 | Acid-base interaction | [ |
| Pig manure | Methylene blue | 525 | 6.5 | – | [ |
| Paper and pulp sludge | Methyl orange | 750 | 8.0 | Complexation | [ |
| Maple wood | Crude oil | 400 | Sea water conditions | Pore-filling | [ |
| Pecan nutshell | Methylene blue | 800 | 6.0 | Chemical adsorption | [ |
| Reactive red 141 | 3.0 | ||||
| Woody tree | Crystal violet | 500 | 8.0 | H-bonding and electron donor/acceptor interaction | [ |
| Rice husk | Crude oil | 450 | Sea water conditions | Hydrophobic interaction | [ |
| Post-harvest residue | Diesel oil | 200−600 | 6.5 | Physical sorption | [ |
| Straw | Sunset yellow Methylene blue | 500, 700 | – | Spectrometer exchange | [ |
| Saw dust | Crude oil | 450 | Sea water conditions | π -π interactions | [ |
| Maize straw | Thiacloprid | 500, 700 | – | π -π interactions and hydrophobic interactions | [ |
| Sugarcane bagasse | Dimethoate | 500 | – | Intraparticle diffusion and Physical sorption | [ |
| Swine manure | Tetracycline | 700 | 9.0 | π -π electron donor/acceptor interaction, H-bonding | [ |
| Eucalyptus sawdust | Dimetridazole Metronidazole | 500 | 7.0 | Physisorption and Chemisorption | [ |
| Chitosan | Ciprofloxacin | 450 | 3.0 | π -π electron donor/acceptor interaction, hydrophobic interaction, H-bonding | [ |
| Swine manure | Imidacloprid | 600 | – | Pore-filling | [ |
| Peanut shells | Doxycycline hydrochloride | 450 | 8.0 | Electrostatic interaction and complexation | [ |
| Rice straw | Tetracycline | 700 | 9.0 | π -π electron donor/acceptor interaction, H-bonding | [ |
Adsorption of organic and inorganic contaminants and their removal percentage using different biomass.
| Type of contaminants | Contaminant | Biomass used | Biochar dosage (%) | Removal efficiency (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic | Poly aromatic hydrocarbons | Hardwood | 10 | 32 | [ |
| Paper mill waste | 5 | 37.9 | [ | ||
| Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins | Wood chips | 1 | 40 | [ | |
| Corn Stover | 1 | 52.3 | [ | ||
| Perfluoro octane sulfonate | Willow | 0.12 | 41 | [ | |
| Maize straw | 0.12 | 70 | [ | ||
| Atrazine | Green waste | 1 | 19 | [ | |
| Carbofuran | Wood chips | 1 | 51 | [ | |
| Trifluralin | Wheat straw | 1 | 13 | [ | |
| Simazine | Green waste | 2 | 95 | [ | |
| Phenanthrene | Wood | 0.1−5 | 50 | [ | |
| Pentachlorophenol | Rice straw | 2 | 96 | [ | |
| Trichloroethylene | Peanut shells | 0.03 | 70 | [ | |
| Soybean Stover | 0.03 | 67 | [ | ||
| Isoproturon | Wood | 2 | 49.8 | [ | |
| Inorganic | Cd2+ | Rice straw | 20 | 97.1 | [ |
| Tree bark | 10 | >99 | [ | ||
| Wheat straw | 40 | 93.6 | [ | ||
| Sludge | 8 | 99.9 | [ | ||
| Pb2+ | Rice straw | 5 | 100 | [ | |
| Chicken manure | 5 | 93.5 | [ | ||
| Soybean Stover | 20 | 90 | [ | ||
| Sugarcane straw | 5 | 50 | [ | ||
| Zn2+ | Sludge | 5 | 51.2 | [ | |
| Hardwood | 5 | 56.7 | [ | ||
| Corn straw | 5 | 67 | [ | ||
| Cr | Sugar beet tailings | 0.8 | 88.5 | [ | |
| As | Hardwood | 47 | 0 | [ | |
| U | Switchgrass | 0.5 | 90 | [ |