| Literature DB >> 33303751 |
Thomas Meier1, Dominique Laniel2, Miriam Pena-Alvarez3, Florian Trybel4, Saiana Khandarkhaeva4, Alena Krupp4, Jeroen Jacobs5, Natalia Dubrovinskaia2, Leonid Dubrovinsky4.
Abstract
One of the most striking properties of molecular hydrogen is the coupling between molecular rotational properties and nuclear spin orientations, giving rise to the spin isomers ortho- and para-hydrogen. At high pressure, as intermolecular interactions increase significantly, the free rotation of H2 molecules is increasingly hindered, and consequently a modification of the coupling between molecular rotational properties and the nuclear spin system can be anticipated. To date, high-pressure experimental methods have not been able to observe nuclear spin states at pressures approaching 100 GPa (Meier, Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 94:1-74, 2017; Meier, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 106-107:26-36, 2018) and consequently the effect of high pressure on the nuclear spin statistics could not be directly measured. Here, we present in-situ high-pressure nuclear magnetic resonance data on molecular hydrogen in its hexagonal phase I up to 123 GPa at room temperature. While our measurements confirm the presence of ortho-hydrogen at low pressures, above 70 GPa, we observe a crossover in the nuclear spin statistics from a spin-1 quadrupolar to a spin-1/2 dipolar system, evidencing the loss of spin isomer distinction. These observations represent a unique case of a nuclear spin crossover phenomenon in quantum solids.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33303751 PMCID: PMC7728769 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19927-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Overview of both spin-pairing and non-pairing regimes.
a Schematic representation of the wave function overlap (red lines) of H2 molecules. b Schematic representation of the nuclear spin energy levels under the influence of an external magnetic field B0 for the pairing (i.e. quadrupole interaction) and non-pairing (dipole–dipole interaction) regimes. c Theoretical line shapes in the pairing and non-pairing regime. ω0 = 2πf0 denotes the Larmor frequency of the hydrogen nuclei, ω, η and Cq are the quadrupole frequency, the asymmetry parameter and the quadrupole coupling constant, respectively.
Fig. 2Experimental and calculated 1H-NMR spectra of molecular H2 up to 123 GPa at room temperature.
Between 20 and 68 GPa, first-order quadrupole interactions describe the experimental data reasonably well. At P > 68 GPa, spectra were found to be broadened by dipole–dipole interaction resulting in a superposition of two Pake doublets corresponding to nearest and next-nearest hydrogen distances.
Fig. 3Extracted 1H-NMR data of molecular H2 at pressures up to 123 GPa at room temperature.
a Top panel: quadrupole coupling constant Cq determined from NMR data (squares). The rose line denotes theoretical ortho–para conversion rates from electric quadrupole interaction[27]. Bottom panel: asymmetry parameter η in the spin-pairing regime (P < 60 GPa). The dashed line represents the inferred η based on the hcp structure of Phase I from diffraction experiments. The shading of the squares at P > 60 GPa highlights the crossover to the non-pairing I = 1/2 regime. b Top panel: next-nearest neighbour distances rnn. Green circles are based on DFT computations[15]. Blue circles are extracted values of rn and rnn from the NMR spectra in the non-pairing I = 1/2 regime. Middle panel: nearest neighbour distances rn (blue circles) and DFT calculations[15] (red circles). The discontinuity at P > 125 GPa in the DFT calculations indicates a transition from the hcp based to a monoclinic structure. Bottom panel: comparison between the equations of state derived from ab initio computations[23] (yellow line) and diffraction data[14,21] along with the unit cell volumes (blue dots) derived from rnn and rn extracted from the NMR experiments. c Extracted isotropic chemical shift values δiso after homonuclear Lee–Goldberg decoupling. Error bars are within the symbol size. The orange dotted line shows the room temperature Raman shift of the H2 vibron[25]. d Selected Raman spectra of the H2 vibron at increasing pressure. Spectra up to 64 GPa are taken from ref. [25]. Error bars in a and b were taken from spectral simulation and comparison with experimental data. Error bars in c are taken from Voigtian spectral line shape fitting to the experimental data. Error bars of the NMR data after Lee–Goldburg decoupling (blue points in c) were within the symbol size.
Fitting parameters of 1H-NMR spectra.
| 1st Order quadrupole interaction | Dipole–dipole interaction | Lee–Goldburg decoupling | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in ppm | |||||
| 20 | 28.1(6) | 0.44(6) | – | – | 8.665(112) |
| 24 | 27.9(8) | 0.43(4) | – | – | 7.363(112) |
| 36 | 30.0(7) | 0.50(7) | – | – | 6.429(112) |
| 42 | 32.7(5) | 0.52(4) | – | – | 5.951(112) |
| 47 | 35.2(6) | 0.44(6) | – | – | 5.928(125) |
| 50 | 44.8(4) | 0.59(3) | – | – | 5.905(114) |
| 54 | 48.0(3) | 0.46(7) | – | – | 5.924(150) |
| 58 | 61.9(7) | 0.49(8) | – | – | 6.139(120) |
| 68 | 43.9(9) | 0.37(9) | – | – | 6.670(173) |
| 71 | 24.5(8) | 0.20(9) | 0.736(5) | 1.509(14) | 7.280(127) |
| 77 | 18.6(7) | 0.15(7) | 0.733(5) | 1.457(13) | 8.479(195) |
| 85 | 16.6(3) | 0.14(6) | 0.732(5) | 1.430(11) | 10.612(149) |
| 97 | 15.0(4) | 0.10(5) | 0.732(5) | 1.340(12) | 15.351(100) |
| 106 | 20.9(6) | 0.04(1) | 0.731(5) | 1.307(14) | 18.895(153) |
| 115 | 19.2(9) | 0.05(7) | 0.729(5) | 1.270(11) | 21.323(147) |
| 123 | 19.5(9) | 0.02(7) | 0.727(5) | 1.270(18) | 22.673(154) |
Cq is the quadrupole coupling constant, η the asymmetry parameter of the electric field gradient tensor in the principle axis system, rn and rnn are the nearest and second nearest neighbour distances, respectively. The isotropic chemical shift, δ, was derived after homonuclear Lee–Goldburg decoupling.