Literature DB >> 33303252

Decontamination of soil contaminated at the surface with Bacillus anthracis spores using dry thermal treatment.

Joseph Wood1, Abderrahmane Touati2, Ahmed Abdel-Hady2, Denise Aslett2, Francis Delafield2, Worth Calfee3, Erin Silvestri4, Shannon Serre5, Leroy Mickelsen5, Christine Tomlinson6, Anne Mikelonis3.   

Abstract

In the event of a large, aerosol release of Bacillus anthracis spores in a major metropolitan area, soils and other outdoor materials may become contaminated with the biological agent. A study was conducted to assess the in-situ remediation of soil using a dry thermal treatment approach to inactivate a B. anthracis spore surrogate inoculated into soil samples. The study was conducted in two phases, using loam, clay and sand-based soils, as well as biological indicators and spore-inoculated stainless-steel coupons. Initial experiments were performed in an environmental test chamber with temperatures controlled between 80 and 110 °C, with and without added humidity, and with contact times ranging from 4 h to 7 weeks. Tests were then scaled up to assess the thermal inactivation of spores in small soil columns, in which a heating plate set to 141 °C was applied to the soil surface. These column tests were conducted to assess time requirements to inactivate spores as a function of soil depth and soil type. Results from the initial phase of testing showed that increasing the temperature and relative humidity reduced the time requirements to achieve samples in which no surrogate spores were detected. For the test at 80 °C with no added humidity, 49 days were required to achieve soil samples with no spores detected in clay and loam. At 110 °C, 24 h were required to achieve samples in which no spores were detected. In the column tests, no spores were detected at the 2.5 cm depth at four days and at the 5.1 cm depth at 21 days, for two of the three soils. The experiments described in the study demonstrate the feasibility of using dry thermal techniques to decontaminate soils that have been surficially contaminated with B. anthracis spores. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus anthracis; Bacillus atrophaeus; Decontamination; Soil; Thermal treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33303252      PMCID: PMC7899236          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  19 in total

1.  A rapid and repeatable method to deposit bioaerosols on material surfaces.

Authors:  M Worth Calfee; Sang Don Lee; Shawn P Ryan
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  Heat activation/shock temperatures for Bacillus anthracis spores and the issue of spore plate counts versus true numbers of spores.

Authors:  Peter C B Turnbull; Dody A Frawley; Robert L Bull
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Dry heat inactivation of Bacillus subtilis var. niger spores as a function of relative humidity.

Authors:  J P Brannen; D M Garst
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-06

4.  Comparison of surface sampling methods for an extended duration outdoor biological contamination study.

Authors:  Anne M Mikelonis; Ahmed Abdel-Hady; Denise Aslett; Katherine Ratliff; Abderrahmane Touati; John Archer; Shannon Serre; Leroy Mickelsen; Sarah Taft; M W Calfee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Efficacy of liquid spray decontaminants for inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spores on building and outdoor materials.

Authors:  J P Wood; Y W Choi; J V Rogers; T J Kelly; K B Riggs; Z J Willenberg
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 6.  The ecology of Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  Martin Hugh-Jones; Jason Blackburn
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2009-08-29

7.  Genomic signatures of strain selection and enhancement in Bacillus atrophaeus var. globigii, a historical biowarfare simulant.

Authors:  Henry S Gibbons; Stacey M Broomall; Lauren A McNew; Hajnalka Daligault; Carol Chapman; David Bruce; Mark Karavis; Michael Krepps; Paul A McGregor; Charles Hong; Kyong H Park; Arya Akmal; Andrew Feldman; Jeffrey S Lin; Wenling E Chang; Brandon W Higgs; Plamen Demirev; John Lindquist; Alvin Liem; Ed Fochler; Timothy D Read; Roxanne Tapia; Shannon Johnson; Kimberly A Bishop-Lilly; Chris Detter; Cliff Han; Shanmuga Sozhamannan; C Nicole Rosenzweig; Evan W Skowronski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Environmental Persistence of Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus subtilis Spores.

Authors:  Joseph P Wood; Kathryn M Meyer; Thomas J Kelly; Young W Choi; James V Rogers; Karen B Riggs; Zachary J Willenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Use of Germinants to Potentiate the Sensitivity of Bacillus anthracis Spores to Peracetic Acid.

Authors:  Ozgur Celebi; Fatih Buyuk; Tom Pottage; Ant Crook; Suzanna Hawkey; Callum Cooper; Allan Bennett; Mitat Sahin; Leslie Baillie
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Colony-Forming Unit Spreadplate Assay versus Liquid Culture Enrichment-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Bacillus Endospores in Soils.

Authors:  Dale W Griffin; John T Lisle; David Feldhake; Erin E Silvestri
Journal:  Geosciences (Basel)       Date:  2019
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.