| Literature DB >> 33302619 |
Abstract
We herein report a new vitrimer system integrated with UV curability, recyclability, andEntities:
Keywords: flame retardancy; mixed transesterification; phosphate diester; recyclability; vitrimer
Year: 2020 PMID: 33302619 PMCID: PMC7760087 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c18852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ISSN: 1944-8244 Impact factor: 9.229
Scheme 1(a) Schematic Structure of RNA and Its Cleavage via Internal Transesterification and (B) Possible Mixed Transesterification between Phosphate Diester Catalyst and Carboxylate Esters
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration of the performance comparison between the conventional cross-linker and the dynamic phosphate diester-based cross-linker. The yellow blocks represent the dynamic phosphate diester bonds, and the pink “L-shaped” blocks represent carboxylic esters as the mixed transesterification collaborator. (b) FTIR spectra of the UV cured HDA and BPA in the range of 1800–1650 cm–1 assigned to the characteristic absorption peak of the C=O group. (c) Storage modulus and tan δ curves, and (d) representative plots of the tensile stress vs tensile strain curve of the UV cured HDA and BPA.
Figure 2Normalized stress relaxation curves of (a) HDA at 150 °C and (b) BPA at different temperatures. (c) Arrhenius plot to calculate the activation energy (Ea) and (d) creep strain of BPA at different temperatures while maintaining a constant stress.
Figure 3(a) Physical recycling of the BPA thermoset through ball milling the broken sample and hot pressing the milled powders. (b) The obtained sample of the HDA after the sample recycling procedure. (c) Tensile stress–strain curves of the original and recycled BPA thermoset under varying recycling conditions. (d) Tensile strength, Young’s modulus, elongation at break, and recycling efficiency of the original and recycled BPA samples. (e) Comparison of the recycling efficiency and difference between Tg and recycling temperature (TR) of BPA with those of previously reported recyclable UV cured thermosets. (f) Comparison of activation energy (Ea) of the BPA with previously reported dynamic exchange reaction (thiol-thioester,[42] boroxine,[43] silyl ester,[18] amine,[9] imine,[44] salkylation,[10] carbonation,[45] carbamate,[46] disulfide,[12] and carboxylate ester[14])-based thermosets.
Figure 4(a, b) Enlarged FTIR spectra and (c) high-resolution C 1s XPS spectra of the original and recycled BPA samples. (d) Mixed exchanges of phosphate diester-based cross-linker generated dynamic thermosets. The black and blue colors represent the two different molecular chains that take part in the transesterifcation process within the BPA networks.
Figure 5(a) Combustion performance of the HDA (top) and the BPA (bottom) specimens. (b) TG curves of the HDA and the BPA samples isothermal at 485 °C for 45 min. (c) FTIR spectra of the char residue at different positions of BPA after combustion testing.
Figure 6(a) Combustion performance of carbon fiber reinforced BPA composite sample. (b) Tensile stress–strain curves of original BPA composite and regenerated BPA composite. (c) Chemically recycled woven carbon fabric and (d) degraded product of the BPA matrix. Optical microscope images of (e) original woven carbon fabric and (f) recycled woven carbon fabric under different magnifications.