Literature DB >> 33302253

Reduction of COVID-19 Incidence and Nonpharmacologic Interventions: Analysis Using a US County-Level Policy Data Set.

Senan Ebrahim1,2, Henry Ashworth1,2, Cray Noah1,2, Adesh Kadambi2,3, Asmae Toumi4, Jagpreet Chhatwal1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, nonpharmacologic interventions (NPIs) have been the main tool used to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes social distancing measures (closing businesses, closing schools, and quarantining symptomatic persons) and contact tracing (tracking and following exposed individuals). While preliminary research across the globe has shown these policies to be effective, there is currently a lack of information on the effectiveness of NPIs in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to create a granular NPI data set at the county level and then analyze the relationship between NPI policies and changes in reported COVID-19 cases.
METHODS: Using a standardized crowdsourcing methodology, we collected time-series data on 7 key NPIs for 1320 US counties.
RESULTS: This open-source data set is the largest and most comprehensive collection of county NPI policy data and meets the need for higher-resolution COVID-19 policy data. Our analysis revealed a wide variation in county-level policies both within and among states (P<.001). We identified a correlation between workplace closures and lower growth rates of COVID-19 cases (P=.004). We found weak correlations between shelter-in-place enforcement and measures of Democratic local voter proportion (R=0.21) and elected leadership (R=0.22).
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first large-scale NPI analysis at the county level demonstrating a correlation between NPIs and decreased rates of COVID-19. Future work using this data set will explore the relationship between county-level policies and COVID-19 transmission to optimize real-time policy formulation. ©Senan Ebrahim, Henry Ashworth, Cray Noah, Adesh Kadambi, Asmae Toumi, Jagpreet Chhatwal. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; communicable diseases; data; data set; effectiveness; incidence; intervention; pandemic; policy; public health; time series

Year:  2020        PMID: 33302253      PMCID: PMC7755429          DOI: 10.2196/24614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  12 in total

1.  Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Howard Markel; Harvey B Lipman; J Alexander Navarro; Alexandra Sloan; Joseph R Michalsen; Alexandra Minna Stern; Martin S Cetron
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The effectiveness of contact tracing in emerging epidemics.

Authors:  Don Klinkenberg; Christophe Fraser; Hans Heesterbeek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Public Attitudes, Behaviors, and Beliefs Related to COVID-19, Stay-at-Home Orders, Nonessential Business Closures, and Public Health Guidance - United States, New York City, and Los Angeles, May 5-12, 2020.

Authors:  Mark É Czeisler; Michael A Tynan; Mark E Howard; Sally Honeycutt; Erika B Fulmer; Daniel P Kidder; Rebecca Robbins; Laura K Barger; Elise R Facer-Childs; Grant Baldwin; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings-Social Distancing Measures.

Authors:  Min W Fong; Huizhi Gao; Jessica Y Wong; Jingyi Xiao; Eunice Y C Shiu; Sukhyun Ryu; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China.

Authors:  Shengjie Lai; Nick W Ruktanonchai; Liangcai Zhou; Olivia Prosper; Wei Luo; Jessica R Floyd; Amy Wesolowski; Mauricio Santillana; Chi Zhang; Xiangjun Du; Hongjie Yu; Andrew J Tatem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle L Holshue; Chas DeBolt; Scott Lindquist; Kathy H Lofy; John Wiesman; Hollianne Bruce; Christopher Spitters; Keith Ericson; Sara Wilkerson; Ahmet Tural; George Diaz; Amanda Cohn; LeAnne Fox; Anita Patel; Susan I Gerber; Lindsay Kim; Suxiang Tong; Xiaoyan Lu; Steve Lindstrom; Mark A Pallansch; William C Weldon; Holly M Biggs; Timothy M Uyeki; Satish K Pillai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Comparison of Estimated Rates of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Border Counties in Iowa Without a Stay-at-Home Order and Border Counties in Illinois With a Stay-at-Home Order.

Authors:  Wei Lyu; George L Wehby
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-05-01

8.  Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy.

Authors:  Giulia Giordano; Franco Blanchini; Raffaele Bruno; Patrizio Colaneri; Alessandro Di Filippo; Angela Di Matteo; Marta Colaneri
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 87.241

9.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.

Authors:  Ensheng Dong; Hongru Du; Lauren Gardner
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 25.071

View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of first UK COVID-19 lockdown on hospital admissions: Interrupted time series study of 32 million people.

Authors:  Syed Ahmar Shah; Sinead Brophy; John Kennedy; Louis Fisher; Alex Walker; Brian Mackenna; Helen Curtis; Peter Inglesby; Simon Davy; Seb Bacon; Ben Goldacre; Utkarsh Agrawal; Emily Moore; Colin R Simpson; John Macleod; Roxane Cooksey; Aziz Sheikh; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  Early public adherence with and support for stay-at-home COVID-19 mitigation strategies despite adverse life impact: a transnational cross-sectional survey study in the United States and Australia.

Authors:  Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Charles A Czeisler; Mark É Czeisler; Mark E Howard; Rebecca Robbins; Laura K Barger; Elise R Facer-Childs
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical public health interventions against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shabnam Iezadi; Kamal Gholipour; Saber Azami-Aghdash; Akbar Ghiasi; Aziz Rezapour; Hamid Pourasghari; Fariba Pashazadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Heterogeneity in the Effectiveness of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions During the First SARS-CoV2 Wave in the United States.

Authors:  William K Pan; Daniel Fernández; Stefanos Tyrovolas; Giné-Vázquez Iago; Rishav Raj Dasgupta; Benjamin F Zaitchik; Paul M Lantos; Christopher W Woods
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-29

5.  Investigating Linkages Between Spatiotemporal Patterns of the COVID-19 Delta Variant and Public Health Interventions in Southeast Asia: Prospective Space-Time Scan Statistical Analysis Method.

Authors:  Wei Luo; Zhaoyin Liu; Yuxuan Zhou; Yumin Zhao; Yunyue Elita Li; Arif Masrur; Manzhu Yu
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2022-08-09

6.  Social, Economic and Overall Health Impacts of COVID-19 on People Living with Disabilities in King County, WA.

Authors:  Nicole Turcheti; Amy A Laurent; Christina Delgado; Kayla Sainati; Kris Johnson; Eva Y Wong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 7.  Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19.

Authors:  Alba Mendez-Brito; Charbel El Bcheraoui; Francisco Pozo-Martin
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 38.637

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.