Literature DB >> 33302115

The prognostic significance of anaplasia in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Archana Shenoy1, Elysia Alvarez2, Yueh-Yun Chi3, Minjie Li4, Jack F Shern5, Javed Khan5, Susan M Hiniker6, Candace F Granberg7, Douglas S Hawkins8, David M Parham9, Lisa A Teot10, Erin R Rudzinski8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Established prognostic indicators in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common childhood soft tissue sarcoma, include several clinicopathologic features. Among pathologic features, anaplasia has been suggested as a potential prognostic indicator, but the clinical significance of anaplasia remains unclear.
METHODS: Patients enrolled on one of five recent Children's Oncology Group clinical trials for RMS (D9602, n = 357; D9802, n = 80; D9803, n = 462; ARST0331, n = 335; and ARST0531, n = 414) with prospective central pathology review were included in this study. Clinicopathologic variables including demographic information, risk group, histologic subtype, and anaplasia were recorded along with overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) with failure defined by recurrence, progression, or death. The log-rank test was used to compare OS and FFS.
RESULTS: Anaplasia was more common in embryonal RMS (27% of all embryonal RMS) than other subtypes of RMS (11% for alveolar RMS, 7% for botryoid RMS, 11% for spindle cell RMS). On multivariate analyses, anaplasia was not an independent prognostic factor in RMS (OS:hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12, p = 0.43; FFS:HR = 1.07, p = 0.56) across all subtypes or within embryonal RMS only (OS:HR = 1.41, p = 0.078; FFS:HR = 1.25, p = 0.16). Among tumors with TP53 mutations, 69% had anaplasia, while only 24% of tumors with anaplasia had a tumoral TP53 mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: Anaplasia is not an independent indicator of adverse outcomes in RMS. Emerging information on the prognostic significance of TP53 mutations raises the possibility that anaplasia may be a surrogate marker of TP53 mutations in some cases. Tumoral TP53 mutation status may be investigated as a prognostic indicator in future studies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaplasia; Rhabdomyosarcoma; TP53 genes

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33302115      PMCID: PMC8842073          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  22 in total

1.  Genomic gains and losses are similar in genetic and histologic subsets of rhabdomyosarcoma, whereas amplification predominates in embryonal with anaplasia and alveolar subtypes.

Authors:  Julia A Bridge; Jian Liu; Stephen J Qualman; Ron Suijkerbuijk; Gail Wenger; Ji Zhang; Xiaoying Wan; K Scott Baker; Poul Sorensen; Frederic G Barr
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Pretreatment TNM staging of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group. Children's Cancer Study Group. Pediatric Oncology Group.

Authors:  W Lawrence; J R Anderson; E A Gehan; H Maurer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Results of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group D9602 protocol, using vincristine and dactinomycin with or without cyclophosphamide and radiation therapy, for newly diagnosed patients with low-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  R Beverly Raney; David O Walterhouse; Jane L Meza; Richard J Andrassy; John C Breneman; William M Crist; Harold M Maurer; William H Meyer; David M Parham; James R Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Focal versus diffuse anaplasia in Wilms tumor--new definitions with prognostic significance: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  P Faria; J B Beckwith; K Mishra; C Zuppan; D A Weeks; N Breslow; D M Green
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma treated on intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma studies III and IV: the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Jane L Meza; James Anderson; Alberto S Pappo; William H Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children's oncology group study D9803.

Authors:  Carola A S Arndt; Julie A Stoner; Douglas S Hawkins; David A Rodeberg; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; Charles N Paidas; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; Moody D Wharam; John C Breneman; Sarah S Donaldson; James R Anderson; William H Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Initial patient characteristics can predict pattern and risk of relapse in localized rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Tobias M Dantonello; Christoph Int-Veen; Peter Winkler; Ivo Leuschner; Andreas Schuck; Bernhard F Schmidt; Helmut Lochbuehler; Sylvia Kirsch; Erika Hallmen; Iris Veit-Friedrich; Stefan S Bielack; Felix Niggli; Bernarda Kazanowska; Ruth Ladenstein; Thomas Wiebe; Thomas Klingebiel; Joern Treuner; Ewa Koscielniak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Childhood rhabdomyosarcoma with anaplastic (pleomorphic) features. A report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study.

Authors:  R Kodet; W A Newton; A B Hamoudi; L Asmar; D L Jacobs; H M Maurer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Dense pattern of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, a lesion easily confused with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Erin R Rudzinski; Lisa A Teot; James R Anderson; Julie Moore; Julia A Bridge; Frederic G Barr; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Stephen X Skapek; Douglas S Hawkins; David M Parham
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Genomic Determinants of Clinical Outcomes in Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Dana L Casey; Leonard H Wexler; Kenneth L Pitter; Robert M Samstein; Emily K Slotkin; Suzanne L Wolden
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  3 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of an embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma occurring in a patient with Kabuki syndrome: report and literature review in the light of tumor predisposition syndromes.

Authors:  Sietse M Aukema; Selina Glaser; Mari F C M van den Hout; Sonja Dahlum; Marinus J Blok; Morten Hillmer; Julia Kolarova; Raf Sciot; Dina A Schott; Reiner Siebert; Constance T R M Stumpel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.446

2.  Deep Learning of Rhabdomyosarcoma Pathology Images for Classification and Survival Outcome Prediction.

Authors:  Xinyi Zhang; Shidan Wang; Erin R Rudzinski; Saloni Agarwal; Ruichen Rong; Donald A Barkauskas; Ovidiu Daescu; Lauren Furman Cline; Rajkumar Venkatramani; Yang Xie; Guanghua Xiao; Patrick Leavey
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 3.  Genetic Characterization, Current Model Systems and Prognostic Stratification in PAX Fusion-Negative vs. PAX Fusion-Positive Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Carina A Dehner; Amy E Armstrong; Marielle Yohe; Jack F Shern; Angela C Hirbe
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.