| Literature DB >> 33301869 |
David J Kirkland1, Meredith L Sheil2, Michael A Streicker3, George E Johnson4.
Abstract
Lidocaine has not been associated with cancer in humans despite 8 decades of therapeutic use. Its metabolite, 2,6-xylidine, is a rat carcinogen, believed to induce genotoxicity via N-hydroxylation and DNA adduct formation, a non-threshold mechanism of action. To better understand this dichotomy, we review literature pertaining to metabolic activation and genotoxicity of 2,6-xylidine, identifying that it appears resistant to N-hydroxylation and instead metabolises almost exclusively to DMAP (an aminophenol). At high exposures (sufficient to saturate phase 2 metabolism), this may undergo metabolic threshold-dependent activation to a quinone-imine with potential to redox cycle producing ROS, inducing cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. A new rat study found no evidence of genotoxicity in vivo based on micronuclei in bone marrow, comets in nasal tissue or female liver, despite high level exposure to 2,6-xylidine (including metabolites). In male liver, weak dose-related comet increases, within the historical control range, were associated with metabolic overload and acute systemic toxicity. Benchmark dose analysis confirmed a non-linear dose response. The weight of evidence indicates 2,6-xylidine is a non-direct acting (metabolic threshold-dependent) genotoxin, and is not genotoxic in vivo in rats in the absence of acute systemic toxic effects, which occur at levels 35 × beyond lidocaine-related exposure in humans.Entities:
Keywords: 2,6-Xylidine; Genotoxicity; Weight of evidence assessment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33301869 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ISSN: 0273-2300 Impact factor: 3.271