Literature DB >> 33301869

A weight of evidence assessment of the genotoxicity of 2,6-xylidine based on existing and new data, with relevance to safety of lidocaine exposure.

David J Kirkland1, Meredith L Sheil2, Michael A Streicker3, George E Johnson4.   

Abstract

Lidocaine has not been associated with cancer in humans despite 8 decades of therapeutic use. Its metabolite, 2,6-xylidine, is a rat carcinogen, believed to induce genotoxicity via N-hydroxylation and DNA adduct formation, a non-threshold mechanism of action. To better understand this dichotomy, we review literature pertaining to metabolic activation and genotoxicity of 2,6-xylidine, identifying that it appears resistant to N-hydroxylation and instead metabolises almost exclusively to DMAP (an aminophenol). At high exposures (sufficient to saturate phase 2 metabolism), this may undergo metabolic threshold-dependent activation to a quinone-imine with potential to redox cycle producing ROS, inducing cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. A new rat study found no evidence of genotoxicity in vivo based on micronuclei in bone marrow, comets in nasal tissue or female liver, despite high level exposure to 2,6-xylidine (including metabolites). In male liver, weak dose-related comet increases, within the historical control range, were associated with metabolic overload and acute systemic toxicity. Benchmark dose analysis confirmed a non-linear dose response. The weight of evidence indicates 2,6-xylidine is a non-direct acting (metabolic threshold-dependent) genotoxin, and is not genotoxic in vivo in rats in the absence of acute systemic toxic effects, which occur at levels 35 × beyond lidocaine-related exposure in humans.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2,6-Xylidine; Genotoxicity; Weight of evidence assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33301869     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  1 in total

1.  Efficient removal of 2,6-xylidine precipitate using different agitation protocols: An in vitro field emission scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  Bhavika B Shetty; Sritejeswar Sripada; Shruti Bhandary; Divya Shetty; Rajaram Naik
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-04-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.