Literature DB >> 33301092

Plant DNA Barcoding Principles and Limits: A Case Study in the Genus Vanilla.

Pascale Besse1, Denis Da Silva2, Michel Grisoni3.   

Abstract

Powerful DNA barcodes have been much more difficult to define in plants than in animals. In 2009, the international Consortium for the Barcoding Of Life (CBOL) chose the combination of the chloroplast genes (rbcL + matK) as the proposed official barcode for plants. However, this system has got important limits. First, any barcode system will only be useful if there is a clear barcode gap and if species are monophyletic. Second, chloroplast and mitochondrial (COI gene used for animals) barcodes will not be usable for discriminating hybrid species. Moreover, it was also shown that, using chloroplast regions, maximum species discrimination would be around 70% and very variable among plant groups. This is why many authors have more recently advocated for the addition of the nuclear ITS region to this barcode because it reveals more variations and allows the resolution of hybrid or closely related species. We tested different chloroplast genes (rbcL, matK, psaB, psbC) and the nuclear ITS region in the genus Vanilla, a taxonomically complex group and therefore a good model to test for the efficiency of different barcode systems. We found that the CBOL official barcode system performed relatively poorly in Vanilla (76% species discrimination), and we demonstrate that adding ITS to this barcode system allows to increase resolution (for closely related species and to the subspecies level) and to identify hybrid species. The best species discrimination attained was 96.2% because of one paraphyletic species that could not be resolved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barcode gap; DNA barcoding; ITS; Species discrimination; matK; rbcL

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33301092     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  10 in total

1.  Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Refining the DNA barcode for land plants.

Authors:  Peter M Hollingsworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants.

Authors:  De-Zhu Li; Lian-Ming Gao; Hong-Tao Li; Hong Wang; Xue-Jun Ge; Jian-Quan Liu; Zhi-Duan Chen; Shi-Liang Zhou; Shi-Lin Chen; Jun-Bo Yang; Cheng-Xin Fu; Chun-Xia Zeng; Hai-Fei Yan; Ying-Jie Zhu; Yong-Shuai Sun; Si-Yun Chen; Lei Zhao; Kun Wang; Tuo Yang; Guang-Wen Duan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Are plant species inherently harder to discriminate than animal species using DNA barcoding markers?

Authors:  Aron J Fazekas; Prasad R Kesanakurti; Kevin S Burgess; Diana M Percy; Sean W Graham; Spencer C H Barrett; Steven G Newmaster; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Brian C Husband
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  The seven deadly sins of DNA barcoding.

Authors:  R A Collins; R H Cruickshank
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  BOLDMirror: a global mirror system of DNA barcode data.

Authors:  D Liu; L Liu; G Guo; W Wang; Q Sun; M Parani; J Ma
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  ITS1: a DNA barcode better than ITS2 in eukaryotes?

Authors:  Xin-Cun Wang; Chang Liu; Liang Huang; Johan Bengtsson-Palme; Haimei Chen; Jian-Hui Zhang; Dayong Cai; Jian-Qin Li
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals.

Authors:  Hui Yao; Jingyuan Song; Chang Liu; Kun Luo; Jianping Han; Ying Li; Xiaohui Pang; Hongxi Xu; Yingjie Zhu; Peigen Xiao; Shilin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode.

Authors:  Peter M Hollingsworth; Sean W Graham; Damon P Little
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species.

Authors:  Shilin Chen; Hui Yao; Jianping Han; Chang Liu; Jingyuan Song; Linchun Shi; Yingjie Zhu; Xinye Ma; Ting Gao; Xiaohui Pang; Kun Luo; Ying Li; Xiwen Li; Xiaocheng Jia; Yulin Lin; Christine Leon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The specific DNA barcodes based on chloroplast genes for species identification of Theaceae plants.

Authors:  Shuai Jiang; Fenglin Chen; Pai Qin; Hai Xie; Guo Peng; Yongliang Li; Xinhong Guo
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 2.  Challenges in Medicinal and Aromatic Plants DNA Barcoding-Lessons from the Lamiaceae.

Authors:  Nazia Nazar; Caroline Howard; Adrian Slater; Tiziana Sgamma
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05

3.  Screening of universal DNA barcodes for identifying grass species of Gramineae.

Authors:  Jianli Wang; Zhenfei Yan; Peng Zhong; Zhongbao Shen; Guofeng Yang; Lichao Ma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 6.627

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.