Literature DB >> 3329957

Continuous infusion or intravenous bolus: what is the rationale for doxorubicin administration?

J Robert1.   

Abstract

In order to achieve a better therapeutic index of anticancer drugs, numerous authors are using continuous infusion therapy rather than classical intravenous bolus injection. In the case of doxorubicin or daunorubicin numerous experimental data have been published, which could provide a rationale to this clinical problem. However, due to the variety of the approaches used, the results are inconsistent and no definitive conclusion can be drawn. Several clinical phase I and II trials have been performed since 1980; they show that the toxicity of doxorubicin may be reduced by the use of continuous infusion, but the preservation of the efficacy of the drug has never been proved. Comparative phase III trials are required before this schedule of administration become routine procedure for this drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3329957     DOI: 10.1089/cdd.1987.4.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Drug Deliv        ISSN: 0732-9482


  4 in total

Review 1.  Use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in the development of new anthracyclines.

Authors:  J Robert
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Epirubicin as a single agent therapy for the treatment of breast cancer--a pharmacokinetic and clinical study.

Authors:  S Eksborg; L Hardell; N O Bengtsson; M Sjödin; B Elfsson
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1992

3.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin given by three different schedules with equal dose intensity in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  C J Twelves; N A Dobbs; M Aldhous; P G Harper; R D Rubens; M A Richards
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Can we optimise doxorubicin treatment regimens for children with cancer? Pharmacokinetic simulations and a Delphi consensus procedure.

Authors:  Christian Siebel; Gudrun Würthwein; Claudia Lanvers-Kaminsky; Nicolas André; Frank Berthold; Ilaria Castelli; Pascal Chastagner; François Doz; Martin English; Gabriele Escherich; Michael C Frühwald; Norbert Graf; Andreas H Groll; Antonio Ruggiero; Georg Hempel; Joachim Boos
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.483

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.