| Literature DB >> 33299068 |
Marina Makrecka-Kuka1, Pavels Dimitrijevs1,2, Ilona Domracheva1, Kristaps Jaudzems1, Maija Dambrova1,2, Pavel Arsenyan3.
Abstract
The development of targeted drugs for the treatment ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33299068 PMCID: PMC7725824 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78620-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Tested fused isoselenazolium salts 1–7.
Cytotoxic activity of 1–7 against breast tumor and normal cell lines.
| Compound | Cytotoxicity, IC50, μM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast cancer cell lines | Normal cell lines | ||||||
| MCF-7 | 4T1 | H9C2 | 3T3 | HEKa | MDCK | A7r5 | |
| Na2SeO3 | 17.1 ± 2.4 | 4.9 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 22.3 ± 3.6 | 13.3 ± 1.1 | 6.3 ± 0.4 | 39.4 ± 8.2 |
| Doxorubicin | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.16 ± 0.06 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 0.75 ± 0.09 | n.t | 57.0 ± 6.1 | 1.82 ± 0.35 |
| 3.10 ± 0.03 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 2.31 ± 0.02 | 3.26 ± 0.40 | 2.89 ± 0.42 | |
| 0.39 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.08 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 2.78 ± 0.08 | 6.27 ± 0.29 | 1.87 ± 0.26 | |
| 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.044 ± 0.005 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 2.21 ± 0.02 | 2.91 ± 0.13 | 1.85 ± 0.22 | |
| 1.48 ± 0.04 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 0.79 ± 0.02 | 2.05 ± 0.05 | 2.54 ± 0.57 | 1.93 ± 0.16 | |
| 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 9.3 ± 0.2 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 2.01 ± 0.08 | 1.51 ± 0.37 | 1.92 ± 0.44 | |
| 3.23 ± 0.03 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 7.4 ± 0.8 | 2.84 ± 0.08 | 6.58 ± 0.33 | 1.97 ± 0.27 | |
| 1.48 ± 0.02 | 0.94 ± 0.06 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 2.19 ± 0.09 | 4.28 ± 0.34 | 1.66 ± 0.25 | |
Values are shown as the means ± S.D. from 3 independent experiments.
nt, not tested.
Figure 2The effects of fused isoselenazolium salts on the levels of NMN, NAD+ and NADH and NAMPT activity in MCF-7 cells (A); NAD+/NADH ratio (B); NAMPT inhibition by 3, 6 and 7. Values are shown as the mean ± S.D. (n = 6). Significant difference (*- p < 0.05) compared with control.
Figure 3The concentration-dependent effects of compounds 3 and 6 on mitochondrial function in permeabilized 4T1 cells. Concentration dependent changes in mitochondrial respiration rate (A) and H2O2 production rate (B) and H2O2/O ratio (C) at Complex I or II linked OXPHOS. P—pyruvate; M—malate; G—glutamate. Values are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 3–5 experiments) relative to baseline (dashed line)—before addition of the compound.
Figure 4The effect of fused isoselenazolium salts at 1 μM concentration on mitochondrial respiration (A), flux control factors (B), H2O2 production rate (C) and H2O2/O ratio (D) in permeabilized 4T1 cells. Representative traces of respiration (E) and H2O2 production rate (F) measurement (vehicle—green (E) and light green (F) lines; compound 6—red (E) and purple (F) lines). CI—complex, I; CII—complex II; LEAK—substrate dependent respiration rate; OXPHOS—oxidative phosphorylation dependent state; P—pyruvate; M—malate; ADP—saturating ADP; G—glutamate; S—succinate; Rot—rotenone, AmA—antimycin A. OXPHOS coupling efficiency corresponds to 1-Respiratory Control Ratio-1. Flux Control Factor indicates on the input of each substrate and/or pathway to the electron transfer system performance. Values are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 3–4 experiments). Significant difference (*- p < 0.05) compared with control.
Figure 5(A) 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra of 0.4 mM 6 (top), 0.4 mM 6 and 1.6 mM DOPC (middle) and 0.4 mM 6 and 1.2 mM DOPC with 0.4 mM CL (bottom) in 90% H2O/10% D2O. (The zoomed aromatic region is shown. Full spectra presented in SI); (B) and (C) Binding isotherms and calorimetric curves at 25 °C for titration of DOPC and CL/DOPC (1:3) containing vesicles with serial injections of compound 6.
Figure 6Proposed cytotoxicity-inducing mechanism of action of isoselenazolium salts.