| Literature DB >> 33298865 |
Sivasundaram Karnan1, Akinobu Ota2, Hideki Murakami3, Md Lutfur Rahman2, Muhammad Nazmul Hasan2, Md Wahiduzzaman2, Ichiro Hanamura4, Lam Quang Vu4, Akihito Inoko3, Toshinori Hyodo2, Hiroyuki Konishi2, Shinobu Tsuzuki2, Yoshitaka Hosokawa5.
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy of the pleura that is currently incurable due to the lack of an effective early diagnostic method and specific medication. The CDKN2A (p16) and NF2 genes are both frequently mutated in MPM. To understand how these mutations contribute to MPM tumor growth, we generated NF2/p16 double-knockout (DKO) cell clones using human MeT-5A and HOMC-B1 mesothelial cell lines. Cell growth and migration activities were significantly increased in DKO compared with parental cells. cDNA microarray analysis revealed differences in global gene expression profiles between DKO and parental cells. Quantitative PCR and western blot analyses showed upregulation of CD24 concomitant with increased phosphorylation of AKT, p70S6K, and c-Jun in DKO clones. This upregulation was abrogated by exogenous expression of NF2 and p16. CD24 knockdown in DKO cells significantly decreased TGF-β1 expression and increased expression of E-cadherin, an epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker. CD24 was highly expressed in human mesothelioma tissues (28/45 cases, 62%) and associated with the loss of NF2 and p16. Public data analysis revealed a significantly shorter survival time in MPM patients with high CD24 gene expression levels. These results strongly indicate the potential use of CD24 as a prognostic marker as well as a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target for MPM.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33298865 PMCID: PMC7674463 DOI: 10.1038/s41420-020-00364-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Death Discov ISSN: 2058-7716
Fig. 1Generation of NF2-knockout (NF2-KO), CDKN2A-knockout (p16-KO), and NF2/p16 double-knockout (NF2/p16-DKO) cell clones using a CRISPR/Cas9 system with the MeT-5A and HOMC-B1 human mesothelial cell lines.
a Single-guide RNA sequences were designed against exon 8 of the NF2 gene (left side) and exon 1 of the CDKN2A (p16) gene (right side). b Independent NF2-knockout clones (NF2-KO#1 and #2), p16-knockout clones (p16-KO#1 and #2), and NF2/p16-DKO clones (DKO#1 and #2) were established. NF2 and p16/14 protein expression was determined by western blot analysis. GAPDH was used as an internal standard.
Fig. 2Cellular phenotype of parent, NF2-KO, p16-KO, and NF2/p16-DKO-Met-5A and HOMC-B1 cells.
a MTT analysis of the growth rate in parental cells, NF2-KO cell clones, p16-KO cell clones, and NF2/p16-DKO cell clones. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05, statistically significant difference between parental and DKO cells. b Representative soft agar colony formation assays are shown. Right bar graphs represent the number of stained colonies. Scale bar = 100 μm. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05, statistically significant difference. c Representative migration assays using a Boyden chamber are shown. The right bar graph represents the number of stained colonies. Scale bar = 200 μm. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences (*P < 0.05).
Fig. 3Gene expression analysis.
Parental MeT-5A cells and knockout cell clones were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted and cDNA microarray analysis was performed using Agilent Whole Human Genome cDNA Microarray Kit (4 × 44 K; Design ID, 026652). a Heat map showing upregulated genes (29 genes; fold change > 20.0) and downregulated genes (76 genes, fold change < 0.05) in the DKO cell clones compared with the parent cells, NF2-KO cell clones, and p16-KO cell clones. The heat map was constructed using normalized values of each sample with Tree View (Cluster 3.0) software. Corresponding upregulated or downregulated genes in the heat map are shown on the right side. b Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. Four genes that were upregulated in DKO cell, as detected using cDNA microarray analysis, were selected for qRT-PCR analysis using the SYBR green method. Relative gene expression levels are shown after normalization to GAPDH mRNA expression. Mean values were compared with the normal control value to calculate the relative amounts of transcripts. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences (*P < 0.05).
Fig. 4Protein expression analyses.
a Western blot analysis showing expression of the indicated proteins in parent cells, NF2-KO cell clones, exogenous NF2 expression/NF2-KO cell clones, p16-KO cell clones, exogenous p16 expression/p16-KO cell clones, DKO cell clones, and exogenous NF2 and p16 expression/DKO cell clones. Cell lysates obtained were used for western blotting analysis to detect protein levels using the specific antibodies listed in Supplementary Table S1. The cell lysates obtained were used for western blotting analysis. GAPDH was used as an internal control. b Quantitation of p-AKT, p70S6K, and c-Jun in MeT-5A and HOMC-B1 cells. p-AKT, p70S6K, and c-Jun expression levels were quantified by measuring the ratio between phosphorylated and total levels. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05, statistically significant difference.
Fig. 5CD24 knockdown reduces cell proliferation and induces gene expression and morphological changes of EMT phenotype in DKO cells.
a Effect of CD24 shRNA on cell proliferation. DKO cells (Met-5A and HOMC-B1) and parent cells were transfected with CD24 shRNA and control shRNA vectors. b Effect of CD24 shRNA on protein expression. c Effect of TGF-β1 inhibitor (vactosertib) on CD24 expression. Cells were treated with 2.5 μM vactosertib for 24 h and cell lysates were used for western blot analysis. GAPDH or total protein was used as an internal control. d Effect of CD24 shRNA on morphological changes in DKO cells and parent cells. DKO cells and parent cells were transfected with CD24 shRNA and control shRNA vectors. After 48 h of incubation, photomicrographs were taken depicting cell morphological in control shRNA-parent, CD24 shRNA-parent cells, control shRNA-DKO cells, and CD24 shRNA-DKO cells. Scale bar = 100 μm. All data are mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05, statistically significant difference.
Summary of immunohistochemistry in this study.
| Case nos. | Age | Sex | Organ (anatomic site) | Pathology diagnosis | Stage | CD24 intensity | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of chest wall | I | 1+ | 100 |
| 2 | 48 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of right pleura | I | 0 | - |
| 3 | 58 | F | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | I | 2+ | 100 |
| 4 | 49 | F | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | I | 2+ | 60 |
| 5 | 22 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | I | 1+ | 60 |
| 6 | 49 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | I | 3+ | 100 |
| 7 | 32 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | I | 2+ | 100 |
| 8 | 29 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | I | 2+ | 60 |
| 9 | 31 | F | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of thoracic cavity | I | 2+ | 100 |
| 10 | 70 | F | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of right pleura | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 11 | 47 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of left pleura | II | 0 | - |
| 12 | 60 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | II | 3+ | 100 |
| 13 | 46 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of thoracic cavity | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 14 | 35 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | II | 0 | - |
| 15 | 83 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura | III | 0 | - |
| 16 | 56 | M | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of pleura mediastinalis | III | 0 | - |
| 17 | 67 | F | Thoracic cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of right thoracic cavity | IV | 3+ | 100 |
| 18 | 57 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | I | 3+ | 100 |
| 19 | 29 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | I | 0 | - |
| 20 | 71 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of mesostenium | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 21 | 63 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 22 | 48 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 23 | 60 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 24 | 60 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | II | 0 | - |
| 25 | 47 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 26 | 33 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | II | 1+ | 100 |
| 27 | 76 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of hypogastrium | II | 3+ | 100 |
| 28 | 78 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of hypogastrium | II | 1+ | 100 |
| 29 | 41 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of hypogastrium | II | 0 | - |
| 30 | 28 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of left retroperitoneum | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 31 | 5 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of right superior belly | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 32 | 45 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | II | 1+ | 100 |
| 33 | 69 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of peritoneum | II | 3+ | 100 |
| 34 | 78 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of hypogastrium | III | 2+ | 100 |
| 35 | 33 | M | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of retroperitoneum | III | 0 | - |
| 36 | 5 | F | Abdominal cavity | Malignant mesothelioma of abdominal cavity | III | 1+ | 100 |
| 37 | 40 | F | Heart | Malignant mesothelioma of left cardiac atrium | II | 0 | - |
| 38 | 50 | F | Heart | Malignant mesothelioma of left cardiac atrium | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 39 | 43 | F | Heart | Malignant mesothelioma of pericardium | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 40 | 43 | F | Heart | Malignant mesothelioma of pericardium | I | 2+ | 100 |
| 41 | 50 | F | Heart | Malignant mesothelioma of pericardium | I | 2+ | 100 |
| 42 | 44 | F | Colon | Malignant mesothelioma of tunica serosa coli | II | 0 | - |
| 43 | 56 | F | Colon | Malignant mesothelioma of tunica serosa coli | II | 2+ | 100 |
| 44 | 60 | M | Epoploon | Malignant mesothelioma of epoploon | II | 3+ | 100 |
| 45 | 60 | M | Epoploon | Malignant mesothelioma of epoploon | II | 3+ | 100 |
| 46 | 67 | M | Thoracic cavity | Parietal pleura | Normal | - | |
| 47 | 87 | F | Thoracic cavity | Parietal pleura | Normal | - | |
| 48 | 60 | M | Thoracic cavity | Parietal pleura | Normal | - |
Each intensity of the positive signal for CD24 was evaluated by two investigators.
Fig. 6Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of CD24 expression.
a Representative IHC results showing CD24 expression in two MPM tissues (right panels, cases 6 and 33) and two normal mesothelium tissues (left panels, cases 46 and 47). b Summary of IHC results in MPM tissues. Immunoreactivity was independently evaluated by two investigators (S.K. and H.M.). Staining intensity was scored as strong (3+), moderate (2+), weak (1+), or negative (0). The number of cases and their staining intensities are shown in the right panel. c Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted to assess the value of CD24 in overall survival of MPM patients in TCGA mesothelioma obtained from the UCSC Xena database. Fluorescence values above the median were considered high CD24 expression, whereas fluorescence values below the median were considered low CD24 expression. Scale bar = 100 μm.