Literature DB >> 33298732

PD-L1 Expression in Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Correlation With Patterns of Tumor Invasion, CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Clinical Outcomes.

Glorimar Rivera-Colon1,2, Hao Chen1,2, Kyle Molberg1,2, Shuang Niu1,2, Amanda L Strickland3, Diego H Castrillon1,4,5,2, Kelley Carrick1,2, Katja Gwin1,2, Jayanthi Lea4,5, Wenxin Zheng1,4,5,2, Elena Lucas1,5,2.   

Abstract

Programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression has been used as a predictive marker for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and has been reported to have prognostic value. Its prevalence and significance in endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) remain underinvestigated. We evaluated PD-L1 expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density in whole tissue sections of 89 ECAs. PD-L1 expression was observed in 68% of ECAs by combined positive score (CPS, cutoff 1) and 29% of ECAs by tumor proportion score (TPS, cutoff 1%). Using CPS, PD-L1 expression was seen in 11%, 78%, and 72% of pattern A, B, and C tumors, respectively, with significantly higher expression in tumors with destructive-type invasion (B and C) (P=0.001 [A vs. B], 0.0006 [A vs. C], 0.0002 [A vs. B+C]). Using TPS, no significant difference in PD-L1 expression was seen between tumors with different invasion patterns (0%, 22%, and 32% in tumors with pattern A, B, and C, respectively; P=0.27 [A vs. B], 0.053 [A vs. C], 0.11 [A vs. B+C]). PD-L1-positive ECAs demonstrated significantly higher CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density (CPS: P=0.028; TPS: P=0.013) and worse progression-free survival when compared with PD-L1-negative ECAs (CPS: hazard ratio [HR]=4.253 vs. 0.235, P=0.025; TPS: HR=4.98 vs. 0.2; P=0.004). When invasion patterns were separately assessed, pattern C tumors similarly showed worse progression-free survival in PD-L1-positive tumors (CPS: HR=6.15 vs. 0.16, P=0.045; TPS: HR=3.78 vs. 0.26, P=0.027). In conclusion, our data show frequent PD-L1 expression in ECA with destructive-type invasion, supporting the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway as a therapeutic target for these tumors. Our data also support PD-L1 as a negative prognostic marker associated with a potentially unfavorable outcome.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33298732     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  3 in total

1.  Expression of B7 family checkpoint proteins in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Liju Zong; Yu Gu; Yuncan Zhou; Yujia Kong; Shengwei Mo; Shuangni Yu; Yang Xiang; Jie Chen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  The Prognostic Values of HPV Genotypes and Tumor PD-L1 Expression in Patients With HPV-associated Endocervical Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Hao Chen; Meiping Li; Amanda L Strickland; Wenxin Zheng; Xiaofei Zhang
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  What Do We Have to Know about PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Literature Review. Part 2: Clinic-Pathologic Correlations.

Authors:  Andrea Palicelli; Martina Bonacini; Stefania Croci; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Sofia Cañete-Portillo; Alcides Chaux; Alessandra Bisagni; Eleonora Zanetti; Dario De Biase; Beatrice Melli; Francesca Sanguedolce; Magda Zanelli; Maria Paola Bonasoni; Loredana De Marco; Alessandra Soriano; Stefano Ascani; Maurizio Zizzo; Carolina Castro Ruiz; Antonio De Leo; Guido Giordano; Matteo Landriscina; Giuseppe Carrieri; Luigi Cormio; Daniel M Berney; Jatin Gandhi; Giacomo Santandrea; Maria Carolina Gelli; Alessandro Tafuni; Moira Ragazzi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 6.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.