Literature DB >> 33297787

Incision site fat thickness and 90-day complications for direct anterior and posterior approach total hip arthroplasty.

Gregory R Sprowls1,2, Bryce C Allen1,2, Kathleen F Lundquist2, Lauren N Sager3, Clint D Barnett1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Defining the distribution of subcutaneous fat around the hip in relation to different approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) may lead to a better understanding of the relationship between obesity and complications. The purpose of this study was to: (1) describe the intraoperative thickness of subcutaneous fat at the incision site for direct anterior (DAA) and posterior approaches (PA) for THA; and (2) examine the relationship between fat thickness and 90-day postoperative complications.
METHODS: Intraoperative fat measurements were obtained at the anterior incision site (AT-IS) of the DAA (n = 60) and the lateral incision site (LT-IS) of the PA (n = 64). Lateral hip fat thickness was measured from preoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiographs (LT-XR). Body mass index (BMI), sex, age, and 90-day complications were collected retrospectively.
RESULTS: Patients within the same demographic groupings had significantly more fat laterally than anteriorly, between 9.6 mm and 17.96 mm. Return to the OR was significantly associated with BMI, AT-IS, and LT-IS. Wound complications were significantly associated with AT-IS. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was significantly associated with BMI and LT-IS. No outcome variables were associated with LT-XR, approach, sex, or age. LT-XR was strongly correlated with AT-IS and LT-IS.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of BMI, sex, or age more soft tissue was encountered with a PA compared to a DAA. General adiposity was associated with return to the OR. Excess incisional fat was associated with wound complications following a DAA and PJI after a PA. LT-XR and clinical examination near the proposed incision, may provide helpful data in making preoperative risk assessments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; direct anterior approach; infection; posterior approach; subcutaneous fat; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33297787     DOI: 10.1177/1120700020977166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  3 in total

Review 1.  Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures.

Authors:  Alexander J Acuña; Michael T Do; Linsen T Samuel; Daniel Grits; Jesse E Otero; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Body Composition Changes in the Immediate Peri-operative Period Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael C Marinier; Ayobami S Ogunsola; Jacob M Elkins
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2022-09-09

3.  Soft-tissue thickness radiographic measurement: a marker to evaluate acute periprosthetic joint infection risk in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Laura Rey Fernández; Francesc Angles Crespo; Silvia María Miguela Álvarez; Martí Carles Bernaus-Johnson; Agustí Bartra Ylla; Lluís Font-Vizcarra
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-06-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.