| Literature DB >> 33297536 |
Chaobin Ren1,2, Qianqian Zhang3.
Abstract
The identification of groundwater chemical characteristics and the controlling factors is of major concern in water environment studies. In this study, we identified the groundwater chemical characteristics, evolution laws and main control factors in a region severely affected by human activities using hydrochemical and multivariate statistical techniques. The results showed that the concentrations of NO3- and TH were the primary pollution factors in the region with intensive human activity because of high concentration and over the standard rates. The major types of groundwater chemistry were HCO3·SO4-Ca and HCO3·SO4-Ca·Mg. The sulfate-type water was as high as 75.0%, 69.2% and 41.2% in the three hydrogeological units. In addition, there were Cl-type and Na-type waters, indicating that the groundwater in this area has been significantly affected by human activities. A principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that the three factors affecting groundwater hydrochemistry in the study area are domestic sewage and fertilizer, water-rock interactions and industrial wastewater. Therefore, we suggest that the government and water environment management departments should prevent the discharge of domestic and industrial wastewater without standardized treatment first in order to effectively prevent the further deterioration of groundwater quality in this area.Entities:
Keywords: control factors; groundwater; human activity; hydrochemistry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33297536 PMCID: PMC7730640 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17239126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Monitoring sites of groundwater in Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan.
Figure 2Hydrogeological cross-section of Hutuo River pluvial fan.
Descriptive statistics of groundwater chemical parameters in three hydrogeological units in Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan.
| Parameters | pH | TDS | K+ | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | HCO3− | Cl− | SO42− | NO3− | NO2− | Fe | Mn | TH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (I) Hutuo River | Min | 7.64 | 500.7 | 0.6 | 10.1 | 135.2 | 10.23 | 187.0 | 51.09 | 62.4 | 68.8 | 0.002 | 0.017 | 0.001 | 379.8 |
| Max | 7.88 | 1913 | 22.0 | 180.8 | 345.4 | 53.1 | 381.4 | 322.4 | 322.3 | 465.0 | 0.007 | 0.552 | 0.012 | 1058 | |
| Mean | 7.73 | 950.4 | 5.80 | 50.9 | 211.7 | 29.7 | 315.7 | 121.5 | 176.7 | 176.2 | 0.003 | 0.148 | 0.004 | 650.6 | |
| SD | 0.08 | 455.6 | 7.66 | 56.1 | 68.3 | 15.8 | 70.0 | 99.3 | 78.7 | 139.7 | 0.002 | 0.180 | 0.004 | 219.7 | |
| Exceed standard rate (%) | 0 | 25 | — | 0 | — | — | — | 12.5 | 12.5 | 62.5 | 0 | 12.5 | 0 | 87.5 | |
| (II) Top of the | Min | 7.42 | 241 | 0.27 | 9.08 | 53.5 | 11.7 | 171.7 | 15.9 | 21.8 | 5.04 | 0.002 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 182.2 |
| Max | 8.40 | 1508 | 7.05 | 307.2 | 224.1 | 79.1 | 429.3 | 343.5 | 318.2 | 216.0 | 0.041 | 0.324 | 0.013 | 814.2 | |
| Mean | 7.80 | 720.4 | 2.00 | 47.3 | 143.8 | 36.0 | 311.7 | 89.9 | 151.4 | 75.8 | 0.005 | 0.067 | 0.003 | 507.3 | |
| SD | 0.22 | 280.7 | 1.26 | 58.0 | 41.6 | 14.6 | 68.8 | 72.6 | 74.9 | 45.0 | 0.009 | 0.084 | 0.004 | 157.7 | |
| Exceed standard rate (%) | 0 | 11.5 | — | 3.8 | — | — | — | 3.8 | 3.8 | 34.6 | 0 | 3.8 | 0 | 73.1 | |
| (III) Center of | Min | 7.38 | 152.2 | 1.26 | 17.7 | 20.6 | 5.95 | 141.0 | 1.06 | 5.27 | 1.76 | 0.002 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 76.1 |
| Max | 7.97 | 626.5 | 2.56 | 139 | 110.1 | 41.5 | 334.2 | 135.3 | 168.6 | 21.8 | 0.004 | 1.313 | 0.040 | 445.9 | |
| Mean | 7.63 | 412.8 | 2.13 | 36.5 | 69.8 | 25.2 | 249.3 | 42.6 | 81.4 | 9.10 | 0.002 | 0.214 | 0.005 | 278.0 | |
| SD | 0.18 | 124.9 | 0.50 | 37.1 | 22.3 | 10.8 | 56.13 | 35.0 | 45.3 | 7.35 | 0.001 | 0.399 | 0.011 | 96.0 | |
| Exceed standard rate (%) | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Standard | 6.5–8.5 | 1000 | — | 200 | — | — | — | 250 | 250 | 88.6 | 3.29 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 450 | |
Note: Mean: average value; SD: standard deviation; Min: minimum value; Max: maximum value; Standard is grade III standard for groundwater quality in China (GB/T14848–2017).
Figure 3Piper diagram of groundwater in Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan.
Figure 4Gibbs diagram for the groundwater in Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan.
Spearman’s correlation matrix of water quality of groundwater in the Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan.
| Parameters | pH | TDS | K+ | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Cl− | SO42− | HCO3− | NO3− | Fe | Mn | TH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1.000 | ||||||||||||
| TDS | −0.079 | 1.000 | |||||||||||
| K+ | −0.066 | 0.215 | 1.000 | ||||||||||
| Na+ | −0.088 | 0.687 ** | 0.320 * | 1.000 | |||||||||
| Ca2+ | −0.067 | 0.917 ** | 0.060 | 0.439 ** | 1.000 | ||||||||
| Mg2+ | −0.177 | 0.752 ** | 0.196 | 0.540 ** | 0.648 ** | 1.000 | |||||||
| Cl− | −0.108 | 0.863 ** | 0.170 | 0.706 ** | 0.741 ** | 0.598 ** | 1.000 | ||||||
| SO42− | 0.015 | 0.826 ** | 0.231 | 0.709 ** | 0.746 ** | 0.634 ** | 0.681 ** | 1.000 | |||||
| HCO3− | −0.165 | 0.823 ** | 0.257 | 0.656 ** | 0.742 ** | 0.808 ** | 0.631 ** | 0.670 ** | 1.000 | ||||
| NO3− | 0.043 | 0.868 ** | 0.222 | 0.370 * | 0.909 ** | 0.585 ** | 0.683 ** | 0.649 ** | 0.645 ** | 1.000 | |||
| Fe | 0.148 | 0.080 | 0.111 | 0.051 | 0.076 | 0.067 | 0.063 | −0.006 | 0.127 | 0.030 | 1.000 | ||
| Mn | 0.091 | 0.032 | 0.205 | −0.018 | 0.048 | −0.012 | −0.018 | −0.007 | 0.157 | 0.029 | 0.737 ** | 1.000 | |
| TH | −0.098 | 0.956 ** | 0.130 | 0.519 ** | 0.964 ** | 0.803 ** | 0.770 ** | 0.756 ** | 0.820 ** | 0.889 ** | 0.083 | 0.040 | 1.000 |
Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Variance analysis of contrast coefficient of groundwater hydrochemical compositions in the Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan.
| Parameters | HRVP | THRAPF | CHRAPF |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| TH | 0.114 | 0.097 | 0.119 |
| TDS | 0.230 | 0.152 | 0.092 |
| K+ | 1.744 | 0.397 | 0.056 |
| Na+ | 1.216 | 1.503 | 1.033 |
| Ca2+ | 0.104 | 0.084 | 0.102 |
| Mg2+ | 0.285 | 0.165 | 0.183 |
| Cl− | 0.668 | 0.653 | 0.675 |
| SO42− | 0.199 | 0.245 | 0.310 |
| HCO3− | 0.049 | 0.049 | 0.051 |
| NO3− | 0.629 | 0.353 | 0.652 |
| Fe | 1.474 | 1.562 | 3.480 |
| Mn | 1.011 | 1.541 | 0.292 |
Note: HRVP: Hutuo Rvier Valley Plain; THRAPF: Top of Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan; CHRAPF: Center of Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan.
Figure 5Loadings of 13 selected variables on varimax rotated factors in the Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan.