Literature DB >> 33297306

Improving the Intercellular Uptake and Osteogenic Potency of Calcium Phosphate via Nanocomplexation with the RALA Peptide.

Michelle O'Doherty1, Eoghan J Mulholland1, Philip Chambers1, Sreekanth Pentlavalli1, Monika Ziminska1, Marine J Chalanqui1, Hannah M Pauly2, Binulal N Sathy3, Tammy H Donahue2,4, Daniel J Kelly3,5,6,7, Nicholas Dunne1,3,5,7,8,9,10,11, Helen O McCarthy1,12.   

Abstract

Calcium phosphate-base materials (e.g., alpha tri-calcium phosphate-TCP)) have been shown to promote osteogenic differentiation of stem/progenitor cells, enhance osteoblast osteogenic activity and mediate in vivo bone tissue formation. However, variable particle size and hydrophilicity of the calcium phosphate result in an extremely low bioavailability. Therefore, an effective delivery system is required that can encapsulate the calcium phosphate, improve cellular entry and, consequently, elicit a potent osteogenic response in osteoblasts. In this study, collagenous matrix deposition and extracellular matrix mineralization of osteoblast lineage cells were assessed to investigate osteogenesis following intracellular delivery of α-TCP nanoparticles. The nanoparticles were formed via condensation with a novel, cationic 30 mer amphipathic peptide (RALA). Nanoparticles prepared at a mass ratio of 5:1 demonstrated an average particle size of 43 nm with a zeta potential of +26 mV. The average particle size and zeta potential remained stable for up to 28 days at room temperature and across a range of temperatures (4-37 °C). Cell viability decreased 24 h post-transfection following RALA-TCP nanoparticle treatment; however, recovery ensued by Day 7. Immunocytochemistry staining for Type I collagen up to Day 21 post-transfection with RALA-TCP nanoparticles (NPs) in MG-63 cells exhibited a significant enhancement in collagen expression and deposition compared to an untreated control. Furthermore, in porcine mesenchymal stem cells (pMSCs), there was enhanced mineralization compared to α-TCP alone. Taken together these data demonstrate that internalization of RALA-TCP NPs elicits a potent osteogenic response in both MG-63 and pMSCs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RALA; bone engineering; calcium phosphate; intercellular; osteogenic; peptide

Year:  2020        PMID: 33297306      PMCID: PMC7762210          DOI: 10.3390/nano10122442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-4991            Impact factor:   5.076


  46 in total

1.  The osteogenic differentiation of human osteoprogenitor cells on Anodic-Plasma-Chemical treated Ti6Al7Nb.

Authors:  Sophie Verrier; Marianna Peroglio; Cyril Voisard; Beat Lechmann; Mauro Alini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Normal bone anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Bart Clarke
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Calcium and phosphate supplementation promotes bone cell mineralization: implications for hydroxyapatite (HA)-enhanced bone formation.

Authors:  Y L Chang; C M Stanford; J C Keller
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-11

4.  Optimisation of the mechanical and handling properties of an injectable calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  R M O'Hara; N J Dunne; J F Orr; F J Buchanan; R K Wilcox; D C Barton
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Delivery of RALA/siFKBPL nanoparticles via electrospun bilayer nanofibres: An innovative angiogenic therapy for wound repair.

Authors:  Eoghan J Mulholland; Ahlam Ali; Tracy Robson; Nicholas J Dunne; Helen O McCarthy
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  The effect of synthetic α-tricalcium phosphate on osteogenic differentiation of rat bone mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Jinzhong Liu; Liang Zhao; Ling Ni; Chunyan Qiao; Daowei Li; Hongchen Sun; Zongtao Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Development and characterization of self-assembling nanoparticles using a bio-inspired amphipathic peptide for gene delivery.

Authors:  Helen O McCarthy; Joanne McCaffrey; Cian M McCrudden; Aleksey Zholobenko; Ahlam A Ali; John W McBride; Ashley S Massey; Sreekanth Pentlavalli; Kun-Hung Chen; Grace Cole; Stephen P Loughran; Nicholas J Dunne; Ryan F Donnelly; Victoria L Kett; Tracy Robson
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 8.  Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions.

Authors:  Ahmad Oryan; Soodeh Alidadi; Ali Moshiri; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration.

Authors:  Jiwoon Jeong; Jung Hun Kim; Jung Hee Shim; Nathaniel S Hwang; Chan Yeong Heo
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2019-01-14

Review 10.  Bone Regeneration, Reconstruction and Use of Osteogenic Cells; from Basic Knowledge, Animal Models to Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Greg Hutchings; Lisa Moncrieff; Claudia Dompe; Krzysztof Janowicz; Rafał Sibiak; Artur Bryja; Maurycy Jankowski; Paul Mozdziak; Dorota Bukowska; Paweł Antosik; Jamil A Shibli; Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska; Małgorzata Bruska; Bartosz Kempisty; Hanna Piotrowska-Kempisty
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimization of cationic polymer-mediated transfection for RNA interference.

Authors:  Xiaojie Fan; Jingnan Yang; Guangyao Wu; Meiyi Wang; Xiaoxia Cheng; Chang Liu; Qian Liu; Yanan Wen; Shuangshuang Meng; Zhenxing Wang; Xuhong Lin; Lei An
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 1.771

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.