Literature DB >> 33296830

Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly versus younger patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Analysis of a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study.

Gerald W Prager1, Leopold Oehler2, Armin Gerger3, Brigitte Mlineritsch4, Johannes Andel5, Andreas Petzer6, Klaus Wilthoner7, Thamer Sliwa8, Petra Pichler9, Thomas Winder10, Sonja Heibl11, Birgit Gruenberger12, Friedrich Laengle13, Eva Hubmann14, Markus Korger15, Martin Pecherstorfer16, Angela Djanani17, Hans-Joerg Neumann18, Kathrin Philipp-Abbrederis19, Ewald Wöll20, Robert Trondl21, Catharina Arnold-Schrauf22, Wolfgang Eisterer23.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) ranks among the deadliest malignancies worldwide. In the MPACT study, first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) demonstrated activity (median overall survival [OS], 8.7 months) and tolerability in patients with metastatic PC (mPC). However, the clinical evidence of nab-P/G in the elderly (>70 years), who account for the majority of patients with mPC, is limited. This is the first prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study evaluating the tolerability and effectiveness of nab-P/G in younger (≤70 years) versus elderly (>70 years) patients with mPC in the daily clinical routine.
METHODS: Eligible patients with mPC were treated with nab-P/G and observed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability of nab-P/G, and the secondary objectives were efficacy and real-life dosing.
RESULTS: A total of 317 patients with mPC (median age, 70 years) were recruited, of which 299, aged ≤70 (n = 162) and >70 (n = 137) years, were eligible for analysis. Baseline characteristics and the safety profile were comparable between the groups. However, fatigue (22.8% versus 13.0%) and decreased appetite (8.8% versus 1.2%) were more frequent in elderly patients. Younger versus elderly patients equally benefited in terms of objective response rate (36% versus 48%), median progression-free survival (5.6 versus 5.5 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03; p = 0.81) and OS (10.6 versus 10.2 months; HR = 0.89; p = 0.4). In addition, the median treatment duration (5 versus 4 cycles), relative dose intensity (70% versus 74%) or reasons for treatment discontinuation were similar. Most patients (56.2% versus 47.4%) benefited from a second-line therapy.
CONCLUSION: This prospective real-world analysis confirms the feasibility and tolerability of nab-P/G treatment and reveals OS data similar for younger patients and elderly patients aged >70 years. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02555813. AUSTRIAN NIS REGISTRY: NIS005071.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albumin-bound paclitaxel; Austria (MeSH); Duration of therapy; Gemcitabine; Pancreatic cancer; Progression-free survival; Prospective study; Survival rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33296830     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  4 in total

Review 1.  Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel: Worthy of Further Study in Sarcomas.

Authors:  Zhichao Tian; Weitao Yao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Chemotherapy for Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Does Age Matter? A Single-Center, Retrospective, Real-World Study.

Authors:  Po-Wei Liao; Shao-Bin Cheng; Cheng-Wei Chou; Hsin-Chen Lin; Cheng-Hsien Lin; Tsung-Chih Chen; Chiann-Yi Hsu; Chieh-Lin Jerry Teng; Yu-Hsuan Shih
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2022-09-18

3.  Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel versus Gemcitabine Alone in Older Adults with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Kobayashi; Motoko Suzuki; Makoto Ueno; Yuta Maruki; Naohiro Okano; Akiko Todaka; Masato Ozaka; Kunihiro Tsuji; Kazuhiko Shioji; Keitaro Doi; Yasushi Kojima; Hidetaka Tsumura; Kazunari Tanaka; Hajime Higuchi; Ken Kawabe; Hiroshi Imaoka; Tatsuya Yamashita; Haruo Miwa; Hiroaki Nagano; Shiho Arima; Hideyuki Hayashi; Atsushi Naganuma; Hironori Yamaguchi; Terumasa Hisano; Kumiko Umemoto; Shuji Ishii; Koji Nakashima; Rei Suzuki; Yohei Kitano; Toshihiro Misumi; Junji Furuse; Hiroshi Ishii
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.837

4.  The effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment: A real-world evidence.

Authors:  Juraj Prejac; Dora Tomek Hamzić; Nikša Librenjak; Irma Goršić; Domina Kekez; Stjepko Pleština
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.