Fabio Conforti1, Paolo Tarantino2, Pamela Trillo2, Laura Pala3, Paola Zagami2, Sara Pirola4, Benedetta Di Venosa4, Chiara Catania5, Paola Queirolo3, Elisabetta Pennacchioli3, Paolo Della Vigna6, Giuseppe Curigliano7, Tommaso Martino De Pas3. 1. Division of Medical Oncology for Melanoma & Sarcoma, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: fabio.conforti@ieo.it. 2. Division of Early Drug Development for IEO, of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 3. Division of Medical Oncology for Melanoma & Sarcoma, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 4. Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 5. Division of Thoracic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, of Milan, Italy. 6. Division of Interventional Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 7. Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary enteric adenocarcinoma of the thymus (EAT) is a recently proposed rare subtype of thymic carcinoma. Unlike thymic carcinomas with squamous histology, for which clinical guidelines are available, little knowledge is available regarding the clinical and pathological features of EAT, and there is no consensus on the best treatment algorithm for such tumors. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature, searching for all cases of EAT reported. We also retrospectively reviewed all cases of EAT treated at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) between January 2000 and January 2020. Individual patient data were extracted and analyzed in order to delineate clinical and pathological features, as well as patients' prognosis and treatments outcome, evaluated in terms of Disease free Survival (DFS), Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirty-three cases (29 reported in literature and 4 new cases treated at IEO) of thymic adenocarcinoma deploying enteric differentiation as defined by WHO-criteria were analyzed. All tumors showed positive immunoreactivity for cytokeratin (CK) 20 and/or caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2). Data on molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing were available in only 3 cases, and did not show actionable findings. At diagnosis, 11 pts had an early-stage (Masaoka I-II) and 22 a locally advanced (10 pts) or metastatic (12 pts) disease. Median-DFS of patients with localized disease was 12 months (95% CI, 7-19). Patients who received systemic chemotherapy were mostly treated with regimens commonly used for thymic epithelial tumors, with a discouraging PFS of 3-5 months for patients with stage IV disease. Median OS of the whole population was 34 months (95% CI, 24-NA:. mOS was not reached for patients with stage I-II disease versus 34 months in stage III-IV (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that EAT represents a distinct entity in the context of thymic epithelial tumors, characterized by aggressive clinical behavior, poor responsiveness to chemotherapy and dismal patients prognosis. More research is needed to better define optimal management strategies for patients with such rare disease.
BACKGROUND:Primary enteric adenocarcinoma of the thymus (EAT) is a recently proposed rare subtype of thymic carcinoma. Unlike thymic carcinomas with squamous histology, for which clinical guidelines are available, little knowledge is available regarding the clinical and pathological features of EAT, and there is no consensus on the best treatment algorithm for such tumors. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature, searching for all cases of EAT reported. We also retrospectively reviewed all cases of EAT treated at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) between January 2000 and January 2020. Individual patient data were extracted and analyzed in order to delineate clinical and pathological features, as well as patients' prognosis and treatments outcome, evaluated in terms of Disease free Survival (DFS), Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirty-three cases (29 reported in literature and 4 new cases treated at IEO) of thymic adenocarcinoma deploying enteric differentiation as defined by WHO-criteria were analyzed. All tumors showed positive immunoreactivity for cytokeratin (CK) 20 and/or caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2). Data on molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing were available in only 3 cases, and did not show actionable findings. At diagnosis, 11 pts had an early-stage (Masaoka I-II) and 22 a locally advanced (10 pts) or metastatic (12 pts) disease. Median-DFS of patients with localized disease was 12 months (95% CI, 7-19). Patients who received systemic chemotherapy were mostly treated with regimens commonly used for thymic epithelial tumors, with a discouraging PFS of 3-5 months for patients with stage IV disease. Median OS of the whole population was 34 months (95% CI, 24-NA:. mOS was not reached for patients with stage I-II disease versus 34 months in stage III-IV (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that EAT represents a distinct entity in the context of thymic epithelial tumors, characterized by aggressive clinical behavior, poor responsiveness to chemotherapy and dismal patients prognosis. More research is needed to better define optimal management strategies for patients with such rare disease.
Authors: Vania Nosé; Ozgur Mete; Baris Boyraz; Peter M Sadow; Sylvia L Asa; Dora Dias-Santagata Journal: Endocr Pathol Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 4.056