Mechanistic Insights into the FeCl3-Catalyzed Oxidative Cross-Coupling of Phenols with 2-Aminonaphthalenes.

The selective FeCl3-catalyzed oxidative cross-coupling reaction between phenols and primary, secondary, and tertiary 2-aminonaphthalene derivatives was investigated. The generality of this scalable method provides a sustainable alternative for preparing N,O-biaryl compounds that are widely used as ligands and catalysts. Based on a comprehensive kinetic investigation, a catalytic cycle involving a ternary complex that binds to both the coupling partners and the oxidant during the key oxidative coupling step is postulated. Furthermore, the studies showed that the reaction is regulated by off-cycle acid-base and ligand exchange processes.

Introduction

Iron-catalyzed oxidative phenol coupling reactions[1] bring together phenols with unfunctionalized C–H nucleophiles such as 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds,[2] conjugated alkenes,[3] arenes, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),[2b,4] and a second phenolic coupling partner.[5] This method is considered to be highly attractive in terms of step- and atom-economy for assembling new phenolic architectures.[6] As part of our group research program, we aimed to extend this reaction for the coupling of anilines to afford N,O-biaryl compounds that are widely used in asymmetric transformations.[7] Anilines and phenols share some of the same properties: they are both electron-rich cyclic π-systems that are prone to oxidation, generating a highly reactive electrophilic radical species.[8] Therefore, the development of selective oxidative cross-coupling reactions between phenols and unprotected anilines is a challenging task that has rarely been achieved.[9]

In an early work, Kočovský studied the reaction between 2-naphthol 1a and 2-aminonaphthalene 2a using a stoichiometric amount of a redox copper amine complex,[9k,9l,9n] affording (±)-2-amino-2′-hydroxy-1,1′-binaphthyl 3 (NOBIN, Scheme A). Recently, the Shindo group has developed aerobic oxidative cross-coupling conditions based on a heterogeneous Rh/C catalyst for the reaction between tertiary N,N-dialkylamino-2-naphthalenes and different nucleophiles, such as N,N-dialkylanilines, arenes, and phenols (Scheme A).[9f,10] Lately, our group has developed an M[TPP]Cl (M = Fe or Mn, TPP = 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-21H,23H-porphine)-catalyzed para-selective oxidative amination of phenols by primary and secondary anilines (Scheme B).[11] We have demonstrated that, depending on the identity of the phenolic para-R group, the products of this coupling are either benzoquinone anils (when R = H or OMe) or N,O-biaryl compounds (when R = alkyl). In a previous paper, we developed a two-step synthesis of optically pure NOBIN derivatives. The practical method is based on a stereoselective FeCl3-catalyzed oxidative cross-coupling between 2-naphthols (e.g., 1a, 1.5 equiv) and 2-aminonaphthalenes with a labile chiral auxiliary group (such as 2c, 1 equiv, Scheme C),[12] affording a mixture of two separable NOBIN diastereoisomers [e.g., (Ra,S)-5 and (Sa,S)-5]. A simple hydrogenolysis of the auxiliary group (H2, Pd/C) offers a direct entry to the desirable (R)-3 and (S)-3 NOBINs in excellent chemical yields. Intrigued by the high degree of cross-coupling selectivity and the excellent yields imparted by the FeCl3/TFA/t-BuOOt-Bu catalytic system, we were interested in probing the underlying mechanism and studying the generality of this method for the preparation of N,O-biaryl compounds (Scheme D).

Scheme 1

(A) Oxidative Cross-Coupling between 2-Naphthols and 2-Aminonaphthalene Derivatives, (B) the M[TPP]Cl-Catalyzed Oxidative Amination of Phenols by Anilines, (C) the Stereoselective Synthesis of NOBINs, and (D) Mechanistic and Scope Studies of the FeCl3-Catalyzed Oxidative Phenol-2-Aminonaphthalene Coupling (This Work)

The general mechanistic line for the oxidative coupling of phenols by iron catalysts involves three key steps: (1) the formation of high-valent iron-phenolate complexes, (2) the generation of a ligated phenoxyl radical intermediate, and (3) coupling with a π-nucleophile or a radical species.[1a] Recent mechanistic studies by our group for the FeCl3-catalyzed oxidative homo- and cross-coupling reaction of phenols revealed a zero-order dependence on the [phenol].[5b] Based on these results, it was suggested that a multicoordinated iron catalyst mediates an inner-sphere oxidative radical–anion coupling between two neighboring ligands (Figure A).[5b] However, the partial order for the phenolic component is no longer zero when the catalyst has a limited number of vacant sites, as exemplified by Katsuki [(Fe[μ-OH][salen])2 catalyst][13] and Pappo [Fe[phosphate]3 catalyst] (Figure B).[5c] Furthermore, when the reaction is mediated by Fe[TPP]Cl, which has only a single axial position available for binding, the coupling takes place between a ligated phenoxyl radical and a liberated phenoxyl[5a] or an anilino radical[11] by an outer-sphere radical–radical coupling mechanism (Figure C). These studies show that the coupling mechanism changes as a function of the iron coordination sphere. Therefore, the selectivity and the efficiency of the oxidative coupling are expected to be affected by the relative binding strengths of the two coupling partners to the redox iron complex.

Figure 1

Relationship between the coupling mechanisms and the catalyst structure.

Herein, we report that FeCl3 is an efficient catalyst for the oxidative coupling between readily oxidized phenols and primary, secondary, and tertiary 2-aminonaphthalene derivatives. The selective conditions were successfully applied for the synthesis of a long list of novel N,O-biaryl compounds that are needed as ligands in catalysis. Our comprehensive mechanistic studies support the existence of an inner-sphere coupling mechanism between a phenoxyl radical and a 2-aminonaphthalene ligand. Furthermore, initial rate kinetic experiments uncovered (a) the involvement of a ternary complex that binds to both the coupling partners and the oxidant during the key oxidative coupling step and (b) the existence of two off-cycle acid−base and ligand exchange processes that regulate the reaction rate.

Results and Discussion

Method Development and Reaction Scope

Our research commenced by applying oxidative phenol–phenol coupling conditions [FeCl3 (10 mol %), t-BuOOt-Bu (1.5 equiv), HFIP, and room temperature], which were developed by our group,[1a,4,5b,14] for reacting 2-naphthol 1a (1.5 equiv) with 2-aminonaphthalene 2a (1 equiv). Fortunately, this reaction proceeded smoothly, affording (rac)-NOBIN 3 in 82% yield (Figure ). However, when secondary and tertiary 2-aminonaphthalene derivatives, N-butyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2d and piperidino-2-naphthalene 2e, respectively, were reacted with 2-naphthol 1a, poor conversions were observed. Our study revealed that the addition of TFA (1.25 equiv) to the reaction between 1a and the secondary 2-aminonaphthalene 2d significantly improved the reaction efficiency, affording NOBIN 6 in 79% yield (Figure ).[12] However, with piperidino-2-naphthalene 2e, a higher concentration of TFA (3.75 equiv) was needed to ensure efficient and highly selective coupling, affording NOBIN 7 in 97% yield (Figure ).

Figure 2

Scope of the oxidative coupling between 2-naphthols and 2-aminonaphthalene derivatives. Reaction conditions: 2-naphthol (1.5 equiv), 2-aminonaphthalene (1 equiv), FeCl3 (10 mol %), t-BuOOt-Bu (1.5 equiv), TFA (1.25 equiv), HFIP (0.5 M), room temperature, and 24 h. The reaction was performed without TFA. The reaction was performed with 3 equiv of 2-naphthol 1a, 4.5 equiv of t-BuOOt-Bu, and 3.75 equiv of TFA in total.

The scope of the reaction was further explored by reacting various 3- or 6-substituted-2-naphthols with 3-, 6-, and/or N-substituted-2-aminonaphthalene derivatives (Figure ). Under the general conditions (rac)-NOBINs 3, 6–17 were prepared in moderate to excellent yields (60–97%). An oxidative coupling between substituted phenols and N-substituted-2-aminonaphthalene derivatives is also possible, affording N,O-biaryl compounds 18–30 with high chemoselectivity and with yields that varied between 38 and 98% (Figure ). Importantly, oxidizable functional groups, such as para-methoxybenzyl (compounds 9, 10, 14, 23, and 25) and conjugate alkenes (13 and 28), survived the mild oxidation conditions. Finally, the scalability of the process was demonstrated by preparing compound 30 on a 2 mmol scale, and the structure of compound 20 was confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis.

Figure 3

Scope of the oxidative coupling between substituted phenols and 2-aminonaphthalene derivatives. Reaction conditions: phenol (1.5 equiv), 2-aminonaphthalene (1 equiv), FeCl3 (10 mol %), t-BuOOt-Bu (1.5 equiv), TFA (1.25 equiv), HFIP (0.5 M), room temperature, and 24 h. The reaction was performed with 3 equiv of t-BuOOt-Bu and 2.5 equiv of TFA in total. The reaction was performed on a 2 mmol scale. The conditions were similar, except for phenol (1 equiv).

Mechanistic Studies

With the aim to elucidate a detailed catalytic cycle that will rationalize the observed reactivity and selectivity, a set of kinetic experiments were performed. The oxidative cross-coupling between 2,6-dimethylphenol (1b) and N-benzyl-2-aminonaphthalene (2f) was chosen since this transformation showed a high degree of cross-coupling selectivity.[15] First, the dependence of [phenol 1b], [t-BuOOt-Bu], and [FeCl3] on the reaction rate was investigated. The results show (i) a saturation curve for phenol 1b, first order at a low concentrations range (0.02−0.1 M; see Figure A and Figure S1 in the Supporting Information) and close to a zero-order dependency at a high concentrations range (0.1−0.3 M); (ii) a positive rate dependence for t-BuOOt-Bu is found when the experiment was performed at a high level of [1b] (0.25 M, Figure A); and (iii) first order in the catalyst was observed for FeCl3 (Figure A).

Figure 4

Initial rate kinetic studies for phenol 1b. (A) Conditions: phenol 1b (0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.15 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). (B) Conditions: (i) phenol 1b (0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.05 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL); (ii) phenol 1b (0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.15 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL); (iii) phenol 1b (0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.25 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). The rates of the formation of product 30 in the initial stage of the reaction were determined by HPLC, using mesitylene as the initial standard.

Figure 5

Initial rate kinetic studies for t-BuOOt-Bu. (A) Conditions: t-BuOOt-Bu (0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 mmol), phenol 1b (0.25 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). (B) Conditions: (i) t-BuOOt-Bu (0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 0.25 mmol), phenol 1b (0.15 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL); (ii) t-BuOOt-Bu (0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 0.25 mmol), phenol 1b (0.25 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL); (iii) t-BuOOt-Bu (0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 0.25 mmol), phenol 1b (0.30 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). The rates of the formation of product 30 in the initial stage of the reaction were determined by HPLC, using mesitylene as the internal standard.

Figure 6

Initial rate kinetic studies for (A) conditions: FeCl3 (0.001, 0.0025, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.015 mmol), phenol 1b (0.1 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.15 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). (B) Conditions: 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 0.25 mmol), phenol 1b (0.1 mmol), TFA (1.25 equiv according to the concentration of 2f), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.15 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). (C) Conditions: TFA (0.05, 0.1, 0.125, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 mmol), phenol 1b (0.1 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.15 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). The rates of the formation of product 30 in the initial stage of the reaction were determined by HPLC, using mesitylene as the internal standard.

The reaction does not take place in the absence of the redox catalyst, as confirmed by the zero intercept and our control experiments. The existence of free radical mechanisms was ruled out since the addition of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) to the reaction mixture had no effect on the coupling yield (see the Supporting Information). Furthermore, these kinetic results strengthen the premise that t-BuOOt-Bu binds to the iron catalyst prior to the slow oxidative coupling step,[2a,5c] ruling out its action as a terminal oxidant that regenerates Fe(III) from Fe(II) after the coupling step.

The initial rate kinetic study indicated that 1b, t-BuOOt-Bu, and 2f, which showed negative order dependency (vide infra), are bound to the iron prior to the irreversible oxidative coupling step. Therefore, a kinetic behavior that characterizes a ternary enzyme (E, Figure ) was considered. The action of ternary enzymes has been comprehensively studied by Cleland[15] and others.[16] These studies indicate that the mechanistic scheme of Bi-substrate enzyme-catalyzed reactions is characterized by a reversible binding of two substrates (A and B) to the enzyme prior to the slow step (E·A·B → products). The formation of E·A·B by the sequential binding of A and B can take place either via “random” or “ordered” sequential mechanisms. In a random mechanism, E·A·B is obtained from both E·A and E·B; i.e., the dissociation constants of substrates to the free enzyme (KiA for A and KiB for B) and from E·A·B to enzymes E·A and E·B (KA and KB, respectively) are equal (KiA = KA and KiB = KB).[17] However, in an ordered sequential mechanism E·A·B is obtained solely from E·A if substrate A binds preferentially to the free enzyme E (KiA < KA and KiB > KB) or solely from E·B if binding of substrate A to this complex occurs in higher affinity (KiA > KA and KiB < KB).[18]

Figure 7

Catalytic reaction involving a ternary complex.

The order in which phenol 1b and t-BuOOt-Bu bind to the iron catalyst (assuming that E = [Fe](2f)m] was determined by performing a set of double-reciprocal analysis experiments.[19] First, phenol 1b (assigned as substrate A) was varied at fixed concentrations of t-BuOOt-Bu (0.05, 0.15, and 0.25 M, Figure B; see also Figure S1 in the Supporting Information) and then t-BuOOt-Bu (assigned as substrate B) was varied at fixed [phenol 1b] values (0.15, 0.25, and 0.30 M, Figure B; see also Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). The Lineweaver−Burk plot for the phenol (Figure B) shows linear lines that intersect above the horizontal axis, whereas the position of the crossover point for the peroxide’s linear lines (Figure B) is below the x-axis. According to Frieden analysis,[19] these results indicate that KiA > KA and KiB < KB (Figure , Eq. 3),[16,17,19,20] suggesting that [Fe]·(2f)m·(1b)·(t-BuOOt-Bu) III is formed from [Fe]·(2f)mI by a sequential binding of the peroxide (step A, Scheme ) and the phenol (Step B).

Scheme 2

Postulated Mechanism for the Oxidative Cross-Coupling between 2,6-Dimethylphenol 1b and N-Benzyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2f

The dependence of 2-aminonaphthalene 2f on the reaction velocity was examined (Figure B). The negative relationship between the reaction rate and [2f] indicates the presence of a competitive off-cycle equilibrium.[21] It is suggested that the association of the peroxide and the phenol to complex I (step A, Scheme ) is suppressed by the competitive binding of 2f, affording [Fe]·(2f)m+1 (V, off-cycle step, Scheme ). Consequently, the rate of the coupling decelerates as [2f] increases. These results also support the assumption that 2-aminonaphthalene 2f serves as a strong N-ligand that coordinates to the iron in preference to phenol 1b and t-BuOOt-Bu.

Product inhibition experiments offer useful inputs when deciding the kinetic mechanism of a ternary complex (E·Q ⇄ E + Q, Figure ). The experiments were performed by monitoring the formation rate of product 30 in the presence of increasing concentrations of NOBIN 6 or t-BuOH. NOBIN 6 was chosen for practical reasons associated with the fact that NOBINs 30 and 6 have different retention times in the HPLC. Figure shows that although t-BuOH acts as a weak inhibitor, at saturating values of NOBIN 6, the catalyst’s activity approaches zero. Unsurprisingly, these results indicate that the coupling product acts as a competitive ligand. It is expected that the concentration of complex IV ([Fe]·(2f)m–1(30), Scheme ) builds up as the reaction proceeds; consequently, the velocity of the coupling decreases.

Figure 8

Product inhibition experiments. The effect of [NOBIN 6] (green diamonds) and [t-BuOH] (purple triangles) on the reaction rate. Conditions: phenol 1b (0.1 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol), NOBIN 6, or t-BuOH (0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.3 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.15 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). The rates of the formation of product 30 in the initial stage of the reaction were determined by HPLC, using mesitylene as the internal standard.

Based on these kinetic results, a detailed mechanistic scheme was postulated and is presented in Scheme . The catalytic cycle begins with the reversible binding of the peroxide and the phenol to [Fe]·(2f)m  (I), affording complex III ([Fe]·(2f)m·(1b)·(t-BuOOt-Bu)), steps A and B). The homolytic cleavage of the peroxide bond by the iron, followed by an inner-sphere coupling between a phenoxyl radical and a neighboring 2-aminonaphthalene ligand, will afford complex IV and two molecules of t-BuOH (step C).[2d,2e,5b,14] The catalytic cycle is terminated by a reversible ligand exchange process that involves the liberation of N,O-biaryl product 30, along with the binding of 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (step D).

Our study implies that the reaction kinetics is strongly influenced by the relative binding strength of the substrates (2-aminonaphthalene, phenol, and peroxide) and the coupling product to the iron. As mentioned previously, the addition of TFA is mandatory when secondary and tertiary 2-aminonaphthalenes are being reacted. It is expected that TFA, which forms an acid–base adduct with the latter coupling partners, interferes in the net of ligand exchange processes. To clarify the role of the acid, we performed additional sets of kinetic experiments.

The dependence of the initial rate on [TFA] (Figure C) revealed that, although no reaction occurs in the absence of the acid, the maximum reactivity is achieved when [2f] and [TFA] are equalized (ca. a 1:1 ratio). However, as the acid concentration increases, the reaction velocity diminishes. These results can be rationalized by the existence of ligand-to-metal exchange and acid–base net reactions (Scheme ). It is suggested that the entire catalytic process is regulated by TFA, which forms an acid–base adduct with 2f. Accordingly, as the acid concentration increases, the concentration of free 2-aminonaphthalene 2f drops (step E). Consequently, the off-cycle equilibrium inclines toward complex I and the rate accelerates (0.05 M < [TFA] < 0.12 M). On the other hand, at high concentrations of TFA ([TFA] > 0.12 M), the concentration of 2f diminishes. Consequently, the catalytic cycle termination step (IV → I, step D), which includes the reversible ligand exchange of the N,O-biaryl product 30 with 2f, is discouraged, and the reaction rate declines.

The strength of the TFA-based adduct depends on the basicity of the 2-aminonapthalene molecule. Therefore, different amounts of acid should be used to regulate the coupling of primary, secondary, or tertiary 2-aminonaphthalenes. To support this claim, a set of competitive experiments that studied the coupling of 2-aminonaphthalenes 2a, 2d, or 2e (1 equiv) and 2-naphthol (1a, 1.5 equiv) either with or without 2 equiv of TFA were performed (Figure ). The results show that the addition of TFA to the reaction of 2a, which is a weaker base in comparison with 2d and 2e, negatively affects the reaction rate (Figure A). On the other hand, the reaction of 2d in the presence of TFA resulted in a significant improvement in the reactivity (Figure B) and cross-coupling selectivity (see Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). Finally, tertiary 2-aminonaphthalene 2e exhibited only a mild improvement in the rate upon the addition of TFA (Figure C). This is probably because 2 equiv of TFA are insufficient to regulate the inhibiting off-cycle process. Indeed, almost twice the amount of TFA (3.75 equiv) is needed to ensure efficient cross-coupling, affording NOBIN 7 in 97% yield (Figure ). Ultimately, the coupling of primary 2-aminonaphthalene takes place at a high efficiency without TFA (see the inserted table, Figure ), whereas the successful coupling of secondary and tertiary 2-aminonaphthalenes relies on the addition of TFA (1.25 equiv and 3.75 equiv, respectively).

Figure 9

Reaction progress of the oxidative coupling of 2-naphthol 1a with N-substituted-2-aminonaphthalenes (A) 2a, (B) 2d, and (C) 2e with and without TFA (2 equiv). Conditions: 2-naphthol 1a (0.375 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2a, 2d, or 2e (0.25 mmol), FeCl3 (10 mol %), TFA (0 or 0.5 mmol), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.375 mmol), and HFIP (0.5 mL) at rt. The formation of products 3, 6, or 7 was determined by HPLC, using mesitylene as the internal standard.

The changes in the catalytic activity at high concentrations of TFA may also be attributed to the generation of iron trifluoroacetate complexes [Fe(CF3CO2)n(Cl)m]. To examine this hypothesis, the Fe(CF3CO2)3 complex[22] was prepared and used as a catalyst (10 mol %) in the coupling between 1b and 2f (Figure ). Fe(CF3CO2)3 exhibited almost no catalytic activity. However, the reactivity was enhanced with the addition of 10 mol % of tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBAC). Interestingly, almost a complete recovery of the catalytic activity (in comparison to FeCl3) was achieved with 1:2 and 1:3 iron to chloride ratios. These results suggest that the chloride anions play a key role during the reaction.

Figure 10

Effect of chloride anions [TBAC] on the catalytic activity of the Fe(TFA)3 catalyst. Conditions: phenol 1b (0.1 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene 2f (0.1 mmol), TFA (0.125 mmol), FeCl3 (0.01 mmol) or Fe(CF3CO2)3 and Bu4N+Cl– (0, 10, 20, and 30 mol %), t-BuOOt-Bu (0.15 mmol), and HFIP (1 mL). The rates of the formation of product 30 in the initial stage of the reaction were determined by HPLC, using mesitylene as the internal standard.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the FeCl3-catalyzed oxidative phenol coupling reaction was applied to combine readily oxidized phenols with primary, secondary, and tertiary 2-aminonaphthalenes. This sustainable and practical method enables a highly selective and efficient synthesis of N,O-biaryl compounds that are not readily available by other means.

Our mechanistic data, which include control experiments and comprehensive kinetic studies, revealed the existence of a catalytic cycle that involves the formation of a ternary iron complex [Fe]·(2f)·(1b)·(t-BuOOt-Bu) (III) from [Fe]·(2f)m (I) by the sequential binding of peroxide and phenol. The irreversible rate-determining oxidative coupling step comprises the conversion of complex III to IV ([Fe]·(2f)m-1(30)) and the liberation of two molecules of t-BuOH. In this transformation, a reaction between an iron-bound phenoxyl radical and a neighboring 2-aminonaphthalene ligand takes place. The velocity of the reaction is regulated by a net of acid–base and ligand exchange processes. The reaction rate is highly sensitive to changes in the concentrations of the substrates (2-aminonaphthalene, phenol, and peroxide), the acid (TFA), and the N,O-biaryl product. Furthermore, the chloride anions have a strong effect on the reaction efficiency. Finally, this study is a part of our laboratory ongoing research that aims to develop selective oxidative cross-coupling reactions for the coupling of anilines by first-row metal catalysts.

Experimental Section

General Methods

All reagents were of reagent-grade quality, purchased commercially from Sigma-Aldrich, Alfa-Aesar, or Fluka, and used without further purification. FeCl3 (anhydrous 98%) was purchased from Strem Chemicals. Purification by column chromatography was performed on Merck chromatographic silica gel (40–63 μm). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analyses were performed using Merck silica gel glass plates 60 F254. NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker DPX400 or DMX500 instruments; chemical shifts are relative to Me4Si as the internal standard or to the residual solvent peak. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data were obtained using an LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany and USA) high-resolution mass spectrometer. The reactions in the microwave were performed using a CEM Discover SP microwave synthesizer. IR spectra were recorded on a JASCO FT/IR-460 Plus FT-IR instrument. HPLC analysis was carried out on an Agilent 1260 instrument equipped with a G4212-60008 photodiode array detector and an Agilent reverse phase ZORBAX Eclipse plus C18 3.5 μm column (4.6 × 100 mm).

General Procedures for the Synthesis of N-Alkyl-2-aminonaphthalenes

Method A

A mixture of 2-naphthol derivative (1 equiv) and alkyl/arylamine (5 equiv) was irradiated in a microwave for 20 h (sealed reaction vessel, temperature of 275 °C was monitored by using an external surface sensor and a power of 200 W). The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure, and the crude residue was further purified by silica-gel column chromatography (silica gel 40–63 μm). This method was used for the preparation of 2-aminonaphthalene derivatives 2d, 2e, 2i, 2j, 2n, and 2o.

Method B(23)

A mixture of 2-aminonaphthalene (1 equiv) and benzaldehyde (1.1 equiv) was stirred in methanol (0.17 M) for 1 h, and then NaBH4 (1.5 equiv) was added. The reaction was stirred for 20 min, and the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. NaOH (1 M, 30 mL) was added and extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic phase was dried over MgSO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was further purified by silica-gel column chromatography (silica gel 40–63 μm). This method was used for the preparation of 2-aminonaphthalene derivatives 2f, 2g, 2h, 2k, 2l, 2 m, and 2p.

N-Heptyl-3-methoxy-2-aminonaphthalene (2i)

This compound was prepared from 3-methoxy-2-naphthol (1 g, 5.74 mmol) and 1-heptylamine (4.24 mL, 28.7 mmol) according to method A. The crude residue was purified by silica-gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 99:1) to afford compound 2i (1.49 g, 96% yield) as a dark red oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.93 (t, 3H, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.25–1.56 (m, 8H), 1.75 (quin, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.24 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.98 (s, 3H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 7.02 (s, 1H), 7.21 (ddt, 1H, J = 8.0, 7.0, 1.2 Hz), 7.29 (ddt, 1H, J = 8.0, 6.9, 1.2 Hz), 7.62 (d, 1H, J = 4.1 Hz), 7.64 (d, 1H, J = 4.0 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 14.2, 22.8, 27.4, 29.3, 29.4, 32.0, 43.8, 55.6, 103.4, 104.5, 122.1, 124.1, 125.4, 126.4, 127.2, 130.6, 138.8, 148.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C18H26NO 272.2009, found 272.2014.

N-Heptyl-6-methoxy-2-aminonaphthalene (2j)

This compound was prepared from 6-methoxy-2-naphthol (697 mg, 4 mmol) and 1-heptylamine (2.84 mL, 20 mmol) according to method A. The crude residue was purified by silica-gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 98:2) to afford compound 2j (787 mg, 72% yield) as a dark gray solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.90 (t, 3H, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.21–1.53 (m, 8H), 1.68 (quin, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 3.19 (t, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 3.88 (s, 3H), 6.83 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 6.90 (dd, 1H, J = 8.7, 2.4 Hz), 7.03 (d, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz), 7.07 (dd, 1H, J = 8.9, 2.6 Hz), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.55 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 14.3, 22.8, 27.3, 29.3, 29.5, 32.0, 44.7, 55.4, 105.6, 106.3, 118.6, 118.8, 127.6, 127.8, 128.3, 130.6, 144.4, 155.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C18H26NO 272.2009, found 272.2003.

N-(4-t-Butylbenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene (2m)

This compound was prepared from 2-naphthylamine (716 mg, 5 mmol) and 4-t-butylbenzaldehyde (0.92 mL, 5.5 mmol) according to method B. The crude residue was purified by silica-gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 98:2) to afford compound 2m (928 mg, 64% yield) as a white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.34 (s, 9H), 4.41 (s, 2H), 6.87 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 6.92 (dd, 1H, J = 8.7, 2.4 Hz), 7.20 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, 6.8, 1.2 Hz), 7.33–7.42 (m, 5H), 7.61 (dd, 1H, J = 8.3, 0.7 Hz), 7.64 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.68 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 31.5, 34.7, 48.2, 104.7, 118.0, 122.1, 125.8, 126.1, 126.4, 127.6, 127.7, 127.8, 129.1, 135.4, 136.2, 146.0, 150.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C21H24N 290.1903, found 290.1899.

N-Benzyl-3-methoxy-2-aminonaphthalene (2n)

This compound was prepared from 3-methoxy-2-naphthol (1 g, 5.74 mmol) and benzylamine (3.14 mL, 28.7 mmol) according to method A. The crude residue was purified by silica-gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 99:1) to afford compound 2n (470 mg, 31% yield) as a white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 3.99 (s, 3H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 4.94 (bs, 1H), 6.82 (s, 1H), 7.06 (s, 1H), 7.20–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.39 (t, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.46 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.59 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.65 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 48.1, 55.6, 103.9, 104.7, 122.4, 124.1, 125.6, 126.4, 127.4 (× 2C), 127.8, 128.8, 130.4, 138.5, 139.2, 148.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C18H18NO 264.1383, found 264.1382.

General Procedure for the Oxidative Cross-Coupling of 2-Naphthols/Phenols with 2-Aminonaphthalenes

To a stirred solution of 2-naphthol or phenol derivative (1.5 equiv), 2-aminonaphthalene derivative (1 equiv), TFA (1.25 equiv), and FeCl3 (10 mol %) in HFIP (0.5 M), t-BuOOt-Bu (1.5 equiv) was added dropwise at room temperature. The reaction was stirred for 24 h until full consumption of 2-aminonaphthalene. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure, and the crude was further purified by silica-gel column chromatography (silica gel 40–63 μm), affording pure NOBIN products.

2-Amino-2′-hydroxy-1,1′-binaphthyl (3)

2-Naphthol 1a (54.1 mg, 0.375 mmol) and 2-aminonaphthalene 2a (35.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. In this reaction, TFA was not added. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 90:10) to afford compound 3 (58.5 mg, 82% yield) as a pale brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.03–7.08 (m, 1H), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.16–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.20–7.30 (m, 3H), 7.33–7.38 (m, 1H), 7.39 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.81 (dd, 1H, J = 7.4, 1.9 Hz), 7.85 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.89 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 108.7, 114.4, 117.8, 118.3, 122.9, 123.8, 123.9, 124.7, 127.1, 127.4, 128.4 (x 3C), 129.6, 130.5, 130.7, 133.3, 134.2, 143.8, 151.9. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M-H]+ calcd for C20H14NO 284.1070, found 284.1058.

2′-(Butylamino)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (6)

2-Naphthol 1a (54.1 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-butyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2d (49.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 95:5) to afford compound 6 (67.4 mg, 79% yield) as a yellow syrup. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.80 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.11–1.23 (m, 2H), 1.33–1.44 (m, 2H), 3.16 (td, 2H, J = 7.1, 1.9 Hz), 6.92–6.98 (m, 1H), 7.14 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.16–7.22 (m, 2H), 7.24 (ddd, 2H, J = 8.0, 4.7, 1.7 Hz), 7.30–7.35 (m, 1H), 7.37 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.75–7.79 (m, 1H), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.90 (d, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 13.9, 20.0, 31.9, 43.7, 107.9, 114.1, 114.3, 117.8, 122.2, 123.6, 123.8, 124.7, 127.0, 127.3, 127.5, 128.3, 128.4, 129.7, 130.5, 130.8, 133.6, 134.3, 145.6, 152.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C24H24NO 342.1852, found 342.1845.

2′-(Piperidin-1-yl)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (7)

2-Naphthol 1a (54.1 mg, 0.375 mmol) and piperidino-2-naphthalene 2e (52.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. In this reaction, addition of 2-naphthol (1.5 equiv), TFA (2 × 1.25 equiv), and t-BuOOt-Bu (2 × 1.5 equiv) was needed to ensure full consumption of 2-aminonaphthalene. Then, the reaction was quenched by the addition of CH2Cl2 and sat. NaHCO3. The organic phase was separated, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 98:2) to afford compound 7 (85.8 mg, 97% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.46 (s, 6H), 2.88–3.06 (m, 4H), 7.09 (dd, 2H, J = 8.0, 0.5 Hz), 7.13–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.34 (dtd, 2H, J = 8.0, 6.6, 1.3 Hz), 7.46 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.51 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.86 (dd, 1H, J = 8.2, 0.5 Hz), 7.88–7.91 (m, 1H), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.26 (bs, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 24.1, 26.4, 53.5, 118.7, 118.8, 120.5, 123.2, 124.6, 125.3, 126.1, 126.2, 126.3, 126.6, 128.0, 128.3, 129.4, 129.7, 129.9, 130.6, 133.8, 134.3, 149.1, 151.8. IR (KBr pellet): 3431 (s, broad), 2934 (s), 1224 (s), 749 (s) cm–1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C25H24NO 354.1852, found 354.1847.

2′-((4-Chlorobenzyl)amino)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (8)

2-Naphthol 1a (54.1 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-(4-chlorobenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2 g (66.9 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 85:15) to afford compound 8 (94.7 mg, 92% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 4.36 (s, 2H), 5.16 (bs, 1H), 6.97–7.03 (m, 1H), 7.09 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.12 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.17 (dd, 1H, J = 8.3, 0.4 Hz), 7.18–7.25 (m, 4H), 7.30 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.2, 6.8, 1.4 Hz), 7.37 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, 6.8, 1.3 Hz), 7.41 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.75–7.80 (m, 1H), 7.84 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.90 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 47.0, 108.5, 114.0, 117.8, 122.6, 123.6, 123.9, 124.7, 127.2, 127.5, 127.8, 128.2, 128.4, 128.5, 128.9 (x 2C), 129.7, 130.7, 130.9, 132.9, 133.5, 134.2, 138.1, 144.7, 152.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C27H21ClNO 410.1306, found 410.1299.

6-Bromo-2′-((3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)amino)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (9)

6-Bromo-2-naphthol (83.6 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2h (69.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 95:5) to afford compound 9 (100.4 mg, 80% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 3.82 (s, 3H), 4.14 (bs, 1H), 4.29 (s, 2H), 5.28 (bs, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 6.64 (dd, 1H, J = 8.2, 2.0 Hz), 6.71 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.76 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.90–6.96 (m, 1H), 7.05 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.16 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.18–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.34 (dd, 1H, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz), 7.41 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.74–7.79 (m, 1H), 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 47.2, 56.1, 107.6, 110.8, 113.2, 114.4, 114.6, 117.6, 118.2, 119.0, 122.5, 123.3, 126.7, 127.5, 127.7, 128.4, 129.6, 130.3, 130.4, 130.8, 131.0, 132.1, 132.6, 134.1, 145.1, 145.8 (x 2C), 152.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C28H23BrNO3 500.0856, found 500.0856.

3-Bromo-2′-((3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)amino)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (10)

3-Bromo-2-naphthol (83.6 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2 h (69.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 95:5) to afford compound 10 (101.4 mg, 81% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.95 (s, 1H), 4.30 (s, 2H), 5.58 (bs, 1H), 6.66 (dd, 1H, J = 8.3, 1.6 Hz), 6.71 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.76 (d, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz), 6.95 (dd, 1H, J = 8.7, 4.5 Hz), 7.13–7.24 (m, 4H), 7.28–7.36 (m, 1H), 7.36–7.45 (m, 1H), 7.75–7.79 (m, 1H), 7.81 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.85 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 8.25 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 47.3, 56.0, 108.5, 110.3, 110.8, 111.9, 113.2, 114.4, 116.2, 118.2, 122.4, 123.3, 124.8, 125.0, 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 128.4, 130.2, 130.9, 132.6, 132.8 (x 2C), 133.8, 144.8, 145.7, 145.8, 148.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C28H23BrNO3 500.0856, found 500.0880.

Methyl 2′-(Heptylamino)-2-hydroxy-3′-methoxy-[1,1′-binaphthalene]-3-carboxylate (11)

Methyl 3-hydroxy-2-naphthoate (75.8 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-heptyl-3-methoxy-2-aminonaphthalene 2i (67.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 85:15) to afford compound 11 (81.9 mg, 70% yield) as a yellow solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.84 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz), 0.88–1.12 (m, 6H), 1.22 (ddd, 4H, J = 21.9, 16.5, 9.1 Hz), 2.52–2.71 (m, 1H), 2.71–2.86 (m, 1H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 4.07 (s, 3H), 6.98 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.08 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.23 (d, 2H, J = 4.7 Hz), 7.28 (d, 1H, J = 4.3 Hz), 7.35 (dd, 2H, J = 6.1, 2.4 Hz), 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.86–7.99 (m, 1H), 8.70 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 14.1, 22.6, 26.7, 28.9, 30.7, 31.8, 46.6, 52.8, 55.6, 105.8, 114.0, 115.7, 119.8, 123.2, 124.0, 124.2 (x 2C), 125.5, 126.8, 127.1, 129.0, 129.4, 129.7 (x 2C), 132.7, 137.7, 138.2, 150.3, 154.4, 170.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C30H34NO4 472.2482, found 472.2477.

Methyl 2′-(Heptylamino)-2-hydroxy-6′-methoxy-[1,1′-binaphthalene]-6-carboxylate (12)

Methyl 6-hydroxy-2-naphthoate (75.8 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-heptyl-6-methoxy-2-aminonaphthalene 2j (67.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 90:10) to afford compound 12 (111.1 mg, 94% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.83 (t, 3H, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.03–1.24 (m, 8H), 1.33–1.46 (m, 2H), 3.14 (t, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 6.84 (d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 6.90 (dd, 1H, J = 9.2, 2.6 Hz), 7.15 (d, 1H, J = 2.6 Hz), 7.16 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.24 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.43 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.79–7.88 (m, 2H), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 8.63 (d, 1H, J = 1.6 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 14.2, 22.6, 26.8, 29.0, 29.7, 31.8, 44.2, 52.2, 55.5, 106.9, 108.0, 114.8, 114.9, 118.7, 119.9, 124.9, 125.0, 125.4, 126.5, 128.4, 128.6, 129.5, 129.8, 131.6, 132.0, 136.1, 144.0, 154.3, 155.4, 167.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C30H34NO4 472.2482, found 472.2459.

2′-(Cinnamylamino)-6-isopropyl-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (13)

6-Isopropyl-2-naphthol[5c] (69.8 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-cinnamyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2k (64.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 95:5) to afford compound 13 (66.3 mg, 60% yield) as a yellow solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.32 (dd, 6H, J = 6.9, 1.9 Hz), 3.03 (hept, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz), 4.00 (d, 2H, J = 4.5 Hz), 5.10 (bs, 1H), 6.15 (dt, 1H, J = 15.9, 4.8 Hz), 6.44 (d, 1H, J = 15.9 Hz), 7.00–7.03 (m, 1H), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.17–7.24 (m, 4H), 7.26 (d, 3H, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.28 (d, 2H, J = 9.1 Hz), 7.37 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.69 (d, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.78–7.81 (m, 1H), 7.87–7.94 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 24.0, 24.1, 34.0, 45.7, 108.7, 114.1, 114.3, 117.7, 122.4, 123.7, 124.7 (x 2C), 126.4, 127.0, 127.2, 127.3, 127.6, 127.8, 128.3, 128.6, 129.9, 130.2, 130.8, 131.1, 132.0, 134.3, 136.8, 144.2, 145.1, 151.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C32H30NO 444.2322, found 444.2319.

2′-((4-Methoxybenzyl)amino)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (14)

5,6,7,8-Tetrahydro-2-naphthol (55.6 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-(4-methoxybenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2l (65.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 95:5) to afford compound 14 (88.1 mg, 86% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 1.80–1.89 (m, 4H), 2.68–2.90 (m, 4H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 4.40 (s, 2H), 6.85 (ddd, 3H, J = 6.8, 5.3, 2.8 Hz), 6.91 (s, 1H), 7.09–7.15 (m, 1H), 7.18–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.29–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 23.3, 23.6, 28.7, 29.6, 47.6, 55.4, 114.2, 114.4, 116.0, 119.3, 122.4, 123.1, 123.9, 127.0, 127.7, 128.2, 128.3, 130.1, 130.2, 131.4, 132.3, 134.0, 139.2, 144.0, 151.7, 158.9. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C28H28NO2 410.2115, found 410.2104.

2′-((4-(t-Butyl)benzyl)amino)-6-(4-(t-butyl)phenyl)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (15)

6-(4-t-Butylphenyl)-2-naphthol[5c] (103.6 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-(4-t-butylbenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2m (72.4 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 98:2) to afford compound 15 (99.9 mg, 71% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.27 (s, 9H), 1.38 (s, 9H), 4.33–4.46 (m, 2H), 7.05 (dd, 1H, J = 6.0, 3.3 Hz), 7.13 (d, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.18–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.27 (d, 3H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.43 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.50 (d, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.57 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.63 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.78 (dd, 1H, J = 5.9, 3.4 Hz), 7.87 (d, 1H, J = 9.1 Hz), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 8.08 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 31.5 (x 2C), 34.6, 34.7, 47.3, 108.2, 114.2, 114.4, 118.2, 122.4, 123.6, 125.3, 125.6, 125.9, 126.2, 126.6, 126.8, 127.0, 127.4, 127.7, 128.4, 130.0, 130.9 (x 2C), 132.7, 134.2, 136.4, 136.5, 138.3, 145.2, 150.1, 150.3, 152.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C41H42NO 564.3261, found 564.3267.

2′-(Benzylamino)-3-(4-(t-butyl)phenyl)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (16)

3-(4-t-Butylphenyl)-2-naphthol[12] (103.6 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-benzyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2f (58.3 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 98:2) to afford compound 16 (80.1 mg, 63% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.39 (s, 9H), 4.43 (s, 2H), 7.05–7.11 (m, 1H), 7.14–7.27 (m, 9H), 7.27–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.38 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, 6.8, 1.3 Hz), 7.49–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.69–7.74 (m, 2H), 7.75–7.81 (m, 1H), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.91 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0, 0.5 Hz), 8.00 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 31.5, 34.8, 47.7, 108.6, 114.3, 114.9, 122.4, 123.7, 124.1, 124.7, 125.4, 126.9 (x 2C), 127.2, 127.4, 127.7, 128.3, 128.5, 128.7, 129.4, 129.8, 130.6, 130.7, 130.9, 132.9, 134.2, 135.1, 139.6, 145.1, 149.9, 150.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C37H34NO 508.2635, found 508.2628.

2′-(Benzylamino)-3-(4-(t-butyl)phenyl)-3′-methoxy-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (17)

3-(4-t-Butylphenyl)-2-naphthol[12] (103.6 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-benzyl-3-methoxy-2-aminonaphthalene 2n (65.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 85:15) to afford compound 17 (122.7 mg, 91% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.46 (s, 9H), 3.95 (q, 2H, J = 13.6 Hz), 4.08 (s, 3H), 6.95–7.07 (m, 2H), 7.19 (dt, 4H, J = 16.2, 7.3 Hz), 7.23–7.45 (m, 6H), 7.53–7.64 (m, 2H), 7.71–7.85 (m, 3H), 7.88–8.12 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 31.5, 34.7, 50.8, 55.9, 106.6, 114.4, 117.3, 123.9, 124.0, 124.5, 124.8, 125.3, 125.4, 126.7, 126.8, 127.1, 127.8, 128.3, 128.4, 129.3, 129.4 (x 2C), 129.5, 130.4, 130.8, 133.5, 135.3, 138.5, 139.9, 149.6, 150.0, 150.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C38H36NO2 538.2741, found 538.2748.

2,6-Dimethyl-4-(2-(piperidin-1-yl)naphthalen-1-yl)phenol (18)

2,6-Dimethylphenol 1b (45.8 mg, 0.375 mmol) and piperidino-2-naphthalene 2e (52.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. In this reaction, addition of TFA (1.25 equiv) and t-BuOOt-Bu (1.5 equiv) was needed to ensure full consumption of 2-aminonaphthalene. Then, the reaction was quenched by the addition of CH2Cl2 and sat. NaHCO3. The organic phase was separated, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 95:5) to afford compound 18 (78.6 mg, 95% yield) as a pale brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.35–1.50 (m, 6H), 2.35 (s, 6H), 2.83–2.92 (m, 4H), 4.71 (bs, 1H), 7.08 (s, 2H), 7.29–7.37 (m, 2H), 7.39 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.70–7.76 (m, 1H), 7.77–7.84 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 16.1, 24.5, 26.5, 53.0, 120.4, 122.4, 123.7, 125.7, 125.8, 127.8, 128.1, 130.2, 130.3, 131.4, 131.6, 133.7, 149.3, 150.8. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C23H26NO 332.2009, found 332.2009. IR (KBr pellet): 3566 (s), 2932 (s), 1231 (s), 749 (s) cm–1.

2-(2-(Benzylamino)-3-methoxynaphthalen-1-yl)-3,5,6-trimethylphenol (19)

2,3,5-Trimethylphenol (51.1 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-benzyl-3-methoxy-2-aminonaphthalene 2n (65.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 95:5) to afford compound 19 (60.6 mg, 61% yield) as a pale brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.89 (s, 3H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 4.04 (s, 3H), 4.05 (d, 2H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.77 (s, 1H), 7.13–7.34 (m, 9H), 7.72 (dd, 1H, J = 7.8, 0.6 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 12.0, 19.7, 20.2, 50.5, 55.7, 106.2, 115.9, 120.4 (x 2C), 123.5, 123.8, 123.9, 124.8, 126.7, 127.1, 128.0, 128.5, 129.1, 129.3, 135.6, 137.6, 137.7, 140.3, 150.0, 151.8. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C27H28NO2 398.2115, found 398.2109.

2-(2-(Dimethylamino)naphthalen-1-yl)-6-methoxy-4-methylphenol (20)

2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol (48 μL, 0.375 mmol) and N,N-dimethyl-2-aminonaphthalene[9f]2b (42.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. In this reaction, addition of TFA (1.25 equiv) and t-BuOOt-Bu (1.5 equiv) was needed to ensure full consumption of the 2-aminonaphthalene. Then, the reaction was quenched by the addition of CH2Cl2 and sat. NaHCO3. The organic phase was separated, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 90:10) to afford compound 20 (75.1 mg, 98% yield) as a pale brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.72 (s, 6H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 6.73–6.83 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.44 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.80 (dt, 2H, J = 5.6, 2.5 Hz), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 21.4, 43.9, 56.1, 111.8, 117.8, 124.5, 125.4, 125.7, 126.2, 126.4, 127.9, 128.3, 128.9, 129.1, 131.0, 133.7, 142.1, 146.9, 149.8. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C20H22NO2 308.1645, found 308.1640.

2-(2-(Benzylamino)naphthalen-1-yl)-6-methoxy-4-methylphenol (21)

2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol (48 μL, 0.375 mmol) and N-benzyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2f (58.3 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 85:15) to afford compound 21 (50 mg, 54% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.38 (s, 3H), 3.97 (s, 3H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 6.69 (d, 1H, J = 0.9 Hz), 6.83 (d, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.11 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.19–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.36 (m, 6H), 7.73 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 21.3, 48.0, 56.1, 111.9, 114.2, 122.0, 122.1, 124.0, 124.4, 126.5, 127.0 (x 3C), 127.5, 128.1, 128.7, 129.5, 130.3, 133.6, 139.9, 141.7, 143.4, 147.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C25H24NO2 370.1802, found 370.1803.

2-(2-((4-Chlorobenzyl)amino)naphthalen-1-yl)-6-methoxy-4-methylphenol (22)

2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol (48 μL, 0.375 mmol) and N-(4-chlorobenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2 g (66.9 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 85:15) to afford compound 22 (52.6 mg, 52% yield) as a pale brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.36 (s, 3H), 3.97 (s, 3H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 6.64 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9, 0.8 Hz), 6.82 (d, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz), 7.01 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.17–7.23 (m, 1H), 7.25 (s, 4H), 7.27–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.71 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 21.3, 47.4, 56.1, 111.8, 114.0, 114.5, 121.9, 122.1, 124.1, 124.3, 126.6, 127.5, 128.2, 128.3, 128.8, 129.6, 130.4, 132.7, 133.6, 138.5, 141.6, 143.0, 147.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C25H23ClNO2 404.1412, found 404.1411. IR (KBr pellet): 3419 (s, broad), 2921 (s), 1506 (s), 1244 (m), 810 (s) cm–1.

2-Methoxy-6-(2-((4-methoxybenzyl)amino)naphthalen-1-yl)-4-methylphenol (23)

2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol (48 μL, 0.375 mmol) and N-(4-methoxybenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2l (65.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 85:15) to afford compound 23 (54.9 mg, 55% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.38 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.99 (s, 3H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 6.67 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9, 0.8 Hz), 6.84 (d, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 6.85 (d, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.87 (d, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.19–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.28–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.75 (t, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 21.3, 47.5, 55.4, 56.1, 111.9, 114.0, 114.1, 114.3, 121.9, 122.1, 124.0, 124.4, 126.5, 127.4, 128.1, 128.2, 129.5, 130.3, 131.8, 133.6, 141.6, 143.5, 147.4, 158.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H] + calcd for C26H26NO3 400.1907, found 400.1900.

2-(2-(Heptylamino)naphthalen-1-yl)-6-methoxy-4-methylphenol (24)

2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol (48 μL, 0.375 mmol) and N-heptyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2o (60.3 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 85:15) to afford compound 24 (66 mg, 70% yield) as a brown syrup. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.91 (t, 3H, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.25–1.35 (m, 8H), 1.52–1.60 (m, 2H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 3.25 (t, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 3.99 (s, 3H), 6.66 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9, 0.8 Hz), 6.84 (d, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.18–7.24 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.76 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.83 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 14.2, 21.3, 22.7, 27.0, 29.1, 29.8, 31.9, 44.4, 56.1, 111.8, 113.9, 114.2, 121.8, 122.2, 124.0, 124.4, 126.5, 127.3, 128.1, 129.5, 130.2, 133.6, 141.6, 143.9, 147.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C25H32NO2 378.2428, found 378.2421.

2-(t-Butyl)-6-(2-((3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)amino)naphthalen-1-yl)-4-methoxyphenol (25)

2-t-Butyl-4-methoxyphenol (67.6 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2h (69.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 85:15) to afford compound 25 (105.2 mg, 92% yield) as a pale brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.47 (s, 9H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 4.34 (d, 1H, J = 15.4 Hz), 4.39 (d, 1H, J = 15.5 Hz), 6.63 (d, 1H, J = 3.1 Hz), 6.73–6.80 (m, 2H), 6.87 (d, 1H, J = 1.6 Hz), 7.02 (d, 1H, J = 3.1 Hz), 7.14 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.23 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.0, 6.4, 1.6 Hz), 7.26–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.78 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 29.6, 35.3, 47.6, 55.8, 56.1, 110.8, 112.3 (x 2C), 113.5, 114.3, 114.9, 118.5, 122.3, 122.4, 123.7, 127.1, 127.6, 128.2, 130.4, 132.7, 133.9, 138.5, 144.2, 145.8, 145.9, 146.7, 153.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C29H32NO4 458.2326, found 458.2311.

2-(2-(Butylamino)naphthalen-1-yl)-4,5-dimethoxyphenol (26)

3,4-Dimethoxyphenol (57.8 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-butyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2d (49.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 80:20) to afford compound 26 (60 mg, 68% yield) as a brown syrup. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.91 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.34 (sex, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.48–1.58 (m, 2H), 3.22 (t, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 6.75 (s, 1H), 7.17 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.22 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.0, 6.0, 2.0 Hz), 7.27–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 14.0, 20.2, 31.9, 43.9, 56.1, 56.5, 100.7, 111.6, 112.0, 114.0, 114.2, 122.2, 123.6, 127.1, 127.4, 128.3, 130.3, 134.1, 143.7, 144.7, 148.3, 150.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C22H26NO3 352.1907, found 352.1909.

4-(2-((4-(t-Butyl)benzyl)amino)naphthalen-1-yl)-2-methoxy-6-methylphenol (27)

2-Methoxy-6-methylphenol (51.8 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-(4-t-butylbenzyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2m (72.4 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 92:8) to afford compound 27 (75.5 mg, 71% yield) as a pale brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.34 (s, 9H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 5.84 (bs, 1H), 6.72 (d, 1H, J = 1.3 Hz), 6.76 (d, 1H, J = 0.5 Hz), 7.18 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.20–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.35 (d, 3H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 15.7, 31.5, 34.6, 48.1, 56.2, 111.0, 114.1, 120.4, 121.8, 124.4, 124.8, 125.6, 125.8, 126.2, 126.9, 127.3, 127.7, 128.0, 128.7, 134.0, 136.9, 143.1, 143.2, 147.0, 150.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C29H32NO2 426.2428, found 426.2420.

(E)-2-(2-(Cinnamylamino)naphthalen-1-yl)-4,6-dimethylphenol (28)

2,4-Dimethylphenol (45 μL, 0.375 mmol) and N-cinnamyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2k (64.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 97:3) to afford compound 28 (53.9 mg, 57% yield) as a yellow solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.31 (s, 3H), 2.33 (s, 3H), 4.05 (dd, 2H, J = 5.4, 1.6 Hz), 6.25 (dt, 1H, J = 15.9, 5.4 Hz), 6.54 (d, 1H, J = 15.9 Hz), 6.85–6.89 (m, 1H), 7.07 (dd, 1H, J = 1.4, 0.6 Hz), 7.17–7.36 (m, 9H), 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 16.4, 20.7, 46.0, 112.5, 114.2, 121.1, 122.3, 123.8, 125.0, 126.4, 127.1, 127.3, 127.6 (x 2C), 128.2, 128.7, 129.7, 130.1, 130.2, 131.2, 132.1, 133.9, 136.8, 144.2, 150.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C27H26NO 380.2009, found 380.2001.

4-(2-((Furan-2-ylmethyl)amino)naphthalen-1-yl)-2,5-dimethylphenol (29)

2,5-Dimethylphenol (45.8 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-(2-furylmethyl)-2-aminonaphthalene 2p (55.8 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 90:10) to afford compound 29 (33 mg, 38% yield) as a brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.85 (s, 3H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 4.41 (s, 2H), 6.11 (dd, 1H, J = 3.2, 0.8 Hz), 6.26 (dd, 1H, J = 3.2, 1.9 Hz), 6.81 (s, 1H), 6.88 (s, 1H), 7.08–7.14 (m, 1H), 7.18–7.32 (m, 4H), 7.72–7.75 (m, 1H), 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 15.5, 19.1, 41.9, 106.8, 110.4, 114.5, 117.1, 120.2, 122.1 (x 2C), 124.3, 126.3, 127.7, 127.8, 128.0, 128.5, 133.8 (x 2C), 137.4, 141.8, 142.5, 153.4, 153.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C23H22NO2 344.1645, found 344.1646.

4-(2-(Benzylamino)naphthalen-1-yl)-2,6-dimethylphenol (30)

2,6-Dimethylphenol 1b (45.8 mg, 0.375 mmol) and N-benzyl-2-aminonaphthalene 2f (58.3 mg, 0.25 mmol) were reacted according to the general procedure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 90:10) to afford compound 30 (66.9 mg, 76% yield) as an orange syrup. The reaction was also performed on a 2 mmol scale, affording compound 30 (523 mg, 74% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.29 (s, 6H), 4.43 (s, 2H), 6.92–6.94 (m, 2H), 7.08 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.16 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.0, 6.5, 1.5 Hz), 7.20–7.32 (m, 7H), 7.67 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9, 1.1 Hz), 7.69 (s, 1H). 13C{1H}NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 16.1, 48.5, 114.4, 120.4, 121.8, 124.1, 124.5, 126.1, 127.1 (x 2C), 127.4, 127.9, 128.5, 128.6, 128.7, 131.3, 134.1, 140.0, 143.0, 151.8. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C25H24NO 354.1852, found 354.1848. IR (KBr pellet): 3419 (s, broad), 2924 (m), 1200 (s), 746 (m) cm–1.