Jason L Yu1,2, Magdy Younes3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Sleep Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Sleep Disorders Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an innovative surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea; however, the treatment failure rate is approximately 22%. Easy arousability may limit the tolerability of stimulation and, by extension, its effectiveness. The odds ratio product (ORP) is a continuous electroencephalographic metric of arousal propensity (range: 0 [deep sleep] to 2.5 [full wakefulness]), and its rate of decline after arousal (ORP-9) is a risk factor for susceptibility to arousal in the presence of frequent arousal stimuli. We hypothesized that individuals with deeper sleep (low average ORP and low ORP-9) are more likely to respond to UAS. METHODS: ORP and ORP-9 were calculated from 126 baseline polysomnograms of participants in the STAR Trial. These values were compared between responders and nonresponders. Adjusted linear modeling was performed to determine the association between ORP-derived variables and treatment response. RESULTS: No differences were found between responders and nonresponders in unadjusted comparisons of ORP-derived variables. On linear regression modeling, significant correlation was found between non-rapid eye movement ORP and reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in ORP was noted between responders and nonresponders to UAS therapy; however, contrary to our initial hypothesis, linear regression modeling trended toward a positive relationship between ORP and UAS response, suggesting that those who have lighter sleep are more likely to respond to therapy; however, these results are only exploratory, and future larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this relationship. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: STAR Trial; Identifier: NCT01161420.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an innovative surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea; however, the treatment failure rate is approximately 22%. Easy arousability may limit the tolerability of stimulation and, by extension, its effectiveness. The odds ratio product (ORP) is a continuous electroencephalographic metric of arousal propensity (range: 0 [deep sleep] to 2.5 [full wakefulness]), and its rate of decline after arousal (ORP-9) is a risk factor for susceptibility to arousal in the presence of frequent arousal stimuli. We hypothesized that individuals with deeper sleep (low average ORP and low ORP-9) are more likely to respond to UAS. METHODS: ORP and ORP-9 were calculated from 126 baseline polysomnograms of participants in the STAR Trial. These values were compared between responders and nonresponders. Adjusted linear modeling was performed to determine the association between ORP-derived variables and treatment response. RESULTS: No differences were found between responders and nonresponders in unadjusted comparisons of ORP-derived variables. On linear regression modeling, significant correlation was found between non-rapid eye movement ORP and reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in ORP was noted between responders and nonresponders to UAS therapy; however, contrary to our initial hypothesis, linear regression modeling trended toward a positive relationship between ORP and UAS response, suggesting that those who have lighter sleep are more likely to respond to therapy; however, these results are only exploratory, and future larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this relationship. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: STAR Trial; Identifier: NCT01161420.
Authors: Magdy Younes; Andrea H S Loewen; Michele Ostrowski; John Laprairie; Frances Maturino; Patrick J Hanly Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-09-15
Authors: Clara H Lee; Everett G Seay; Benjamin K Walters; Nicholas J Scalzitti; Raj C Dedhia Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Rajeev Ratnavadivel; Nuy Chau; Daniel Stadler; Aeneas Yeo; R Doug McEvoy; Peter G Catcheside Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Olivier M Vanderveken; Joachim T Maurer; Winfried Hohenhorst; Evert Hamans; Ho-Sheng Lin; Anneclaire V Vroegop; Clemens Anders; Nico de Vries; Paul H Van de Heyning Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Clemens Heiser; Armin Steffen; Maurits Boon; Benedikt Hofauer; Karl Doghramji; Joachim T Maurer; J Ulrich Sommer; Ryan Soose; Patrick J Strollo; Richard Schwab; Erica Thaler; Kirk Withrow; Alan Kominsky; Christopher Larsen; Eric J Kezirian; Jennifer Hsia; Stanley Chia; John Harwick; Kingman Strohl; Reena Mehra Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Erica Thaler; Richard Schwab; Joachim Maurer; Ryan Soose; Christopher Larsen; Suzanne Stevens; Damien Stevens; Maurits Boon; Colin Huntley; Karl Doghramji; Tina Waters; Alan Kominsky; Armin Steffen; Eric Kezirian; Benedikt Hofauer; Ulrich Sommer; Kirk Withrow; Kingman Strohl; Clemens Heiser Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2019-09-14 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Anna Ricci; Susan L Calhoun; Fan He; Jidong Fang; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Duanping Liao; Edward O Bixler; Magdy Younes; Julio Fernandez-Mendoza Journal: Sleep Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 6.313
Authors: Alexander M Choi; Michael J Brenner; Daniel Gorelik; Isaac D Erbele; Matthew G Crowson; Prajoy Kadkade; Masayoshi Takashima; Peter L Santa Maria; Robert S Hong; Austin S Rose; Benjamin T Ostrander; Cyrus C Rabbani; Robert J Morrison; Philip A Weissbrod; Alan D Tate; Joshua J Kain; Ioan A Lina; Scott R Shaffer; Omar G Ahmed Journal: OTO Open Date: 2022-09-23