| Literature DB >> 33294644 |
James Robert Janopaul-Naylor1, Jim Zhong1, Yuan Liu2, Chao Zhang2, Adeboye O Osunkoya3,4, Shreyas Subhash Joshi4, Mehmet Asim Bilen5, Bradley Carthon5, Omer Kucuk5, Lindsey Marie Hartsell4, Joseph Shelton1, Ashesh B Jani1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, bladder preserving chemoradiotherapy (BPCRT) has shown to be a viable alternative for patients with urothelial carcinoma (UCa). Traditionally bladder cancer with variant histology UCa or other tumors types involving the bladder have worse outcomes and BPCRT has been contraindicated. However, there is limited high level evidence for this recommendation. MATERIALS/Entities:
Keywords: Adenocarcinoma; Bladder cancer; Chemoradiation; Radiotherapy; Squamous cell carcinoma; Surgery; Variant histology
Year: 2020 PMID: 33294644 PMCID: PMC7691675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.11.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ISSN: 2405-6308
Patient Characteristics.
| Surgery (n = 2,093) | Bladder Preservation (n = 356) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66 | 72 | |||
| Male | 1,338 (64%) | 228 (64%) | 0.966 | |
| Female | 755 (36%) | 128 (36%) | ||
| White | 1,881 (91%) | 308 (87%) | ||
| Black | 138 (6.7%) | 38 (11%) | ||
| Other | 54 (2.6%) | 10 (3%) | ||
| Community or Integrated Network Cancer Program | 354 (17%) | 82 (23%) | ||
| Comprehensive Community Cancer Program | 526 (26%) | 159 (45%) | ||
| Academic/Research Program | 1,186 (57%) | 114 (32%) | ||
| 0 | 1,400 (67%) | 233 (65%) | 0.594 | |
| 1+ | 693 (33%) | 123 (35%) | ||
| T2 | 1,571 (75%) | 237 (67%) | ||
| T3 | 325 (16%) | 50 (14%) | ||
| T4 | 197 (9%) | 69 (19%) | ||
| Squamous Cell | 728 (35%) | 94 (26%) | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 318 (15%) | 38 (11%) | ||
| Neuroendocrine | 310 (15%) | 135 (38%) | ||
| Micropapillary | 206 (10%) | 16 (5%) | ||
| Other | 531 (25%) | 73 (21%) |
Multivariable analysis for patient and treatment characteristics with overall survival.
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | HR P-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Group | BPCRT | 1.15 (1.00–1.33) | 0.052 |
| Surgery | – | ||
| Age | >65 | 1.24 (1.07–1.43) | |
| ≤ 65 | – | ||
| Charlson-Deyo | 1+ | 1.24 (1.12–1.39) | |
| 0 | – | ||
| T-Stage | T4 | 1.90 (1.60–2.22) | |
| T3 | 1.20 (1.03–1.38) | ||
| T2 | – |
Bold = statistically significant (P < 0.005).
Propensity Score weighted sample for overall survival based on treatment by histology.
| Cohort | Treatment Group | N | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | HR P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | BPCRT | 350 | 1.08 (0.90–1.30) | 0.387 |
| Surgery | 2011 | – | ||
| Squamous Cell | BPCRT | 92 | 1.49 (1.25–1.77) | |
| Surgery | 695 | – | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | BPCRT | 38 | 1.75 (1.36–2.25) | |
| Surgery | 308 | – | ||
| Neuroendocrine | BPCRT | 133 | 1.02 (0.80–1.29) | 0.89 |
| Surgery | 299 | – | ||
| Micropapillary | BPCRT | 16 | 0.60 (0.41–0.87) | 0.007 |
| Surgery | 197 | – | ||
| Other | BPCRT | 71 | 0.95 (0.77–1.18) | 0.66 |
| Surgery | 512 | – |
Bolded = statistically significant at p < 0.005.
Fig. 1Kaplan Meier Curves for overall survival in propensity matched cohorts treated with BPCRT or definitive surgery.
Fig. 2Kaplan Meier curves for overall survival in propensity matched cohorts by histology.