| Literature DB >> 33294127 |
Jiacheng Wang1,2, Zhimin Xue1,2, Chunting Hua3, Jun Lin1,2, Zhida Shen1,2, Yinjing Song3, Hangying Ying1,2, Qingbo Lv1,2, Meihui Wang1,2, Binquan Zhou1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease is currently the leading cause of death in humans. Its poor prognosis and high mortality are associated with myocardial ischemia, which leads to metabolic disorder-related cardiomyocyte apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Previous cardiovascular metabolomics studies in humans and mice have shown that proline metabolism is severely altered after cardiomyocyte hypoxia. Proline dehydrogenase (PRODH) is located on the inner mitochondrial membrane and is an enzyme that catalyzes the first step of proline catabolism, which plays an important role in improving the cellular redox state. In vitro oxygen-glucose deprivation can mimic in vivo myocardial ischemic injury. This study is aimed at investigating whether enhancing proline metabolism by overexpressing PRODH can ameliorate hypoxia-induced injury in cardiomyocytes and to reveal the related altered metabolites and mechanistic pathway via untargeted metabolomics analysis. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33294127 PMCID: PMC7718065 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8866946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1The expression of the proline-degrading enzyme PRODH is downregulated after MI and hypoxia. (a) Relative expression levels of the proline-degrading enzyme PRODH in 8 nonfailing patients and 8 ischemic HF patients from dataset GSE46224 (n = 8). (b) Relative expression levels of the proline-degrading enzyme PRODH between the sham and 1-day, 1-week, or 8-week MI groups from dataset GSE114695 (n = 3). (c) Western blot analysis and quantification of PRODH expression in the normoxia control group and the hypoxia group (n = 6). (d) Results of quantitative statistical analysis of PRODH expression as measured by RT-qPCR in the normoxia control group and the hypoxia group (n = 6). The data are presented as the mean ± SD values. ∗p < 0.05 versus the normoxia control group.
Figure 2Enhanced proline metabolism induced by the overexpression of PRODH reduces apoptosis levels, whereas PRODH knockdown has the opposite effect. (a) Representative images and analysis of FITC-Annexin V/PI-positive apoptotic H9c2 cells by flow cytometry (n = 3). (b) Relative LDH release (n = 3). (c) Cardiomyocyte apoptosis was evaluated by TUNEL, and the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells is shown. Scale bar, 100 μm (n = 3). (d) Representative images and quantitative analysis of cleaved caspase-3 expression in H9c2 cells (n = 4). The data are presented as the mean ± SD values. ∗p < 0.05 versus the normoxia control group; #p < 0.05 versus the Ad-NC or Ad-shNC negative control group.
Figure 3Enhanced proline metabolism induced by overexpression of PRODH decreases reactive oxidative stress, whereas PRODH knockdown has the opposite effect. (a) Representative images and quantitative analysis of reactive oxidative stress as assessed by flow cytometric analysis with DCFH fluorescent staining (n = 3). (b) Representative images and quantitative analysis of superoxide production as measured by DHE fluorescence. Scale bar, 100 μm (n = 3). The data are presented as the mean ± SD values. ∗p < 0.05 versus the normoxia control group; #p < 0.05 versus the Ad-NC or Ad-shNC negative control group.
Figure 4(a) Total ion chromatograms for the QC group, Ad-NC group, and Ad-PRODH group in positive and negative ion modes. (b) PCA score plot: (▲) QC group (■) Ad-PRODH group, and (●) Ad-NC group.
Figure 5PLS-DA score plot and OPLS-DA for the model discriminating cell samples from the Ad-NC group and Ad-PRODH group. (a) POS-PLS-DA score plot. (b) NEG-PLS-DA score plot. (c, d) POS-OPLS-DA score plot. (e, f) NEG-OPLS-DA score plot: (■) Ad-PRODH group, and (●) Ad-NC group.
Statistical analysis of 47 differential metabolites from the comparison of the Ad-NC group and the Ad-PRODH group under hypoxia in cardiomyocyte.
| Ion mode | Description | m/z | rt(s) | VIP | FC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine | 786.60 | 143.49 | 7.05 | 0.90 | 6.59 |
| 1-Stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycerol | 627.53 | 113.65 | 6.55 | 2.27 | 9.58 | |
| 2-Methylbutyroylcarnitine | 246.17 | 242.30 | 1.05 | 1.59 | 7.77 | |
| Acetylcarnitine | 204.12 | 315.31 | 3.30 | 0.72 | 7.71 | |
| Cytidine 5′-diphosphocholine (CDP-choline) | 489.11 | 449.49 | 1.19 | 0.66 | 1.33 | |
| D-Proline | 116.07 | 323.98 | 2.54 | 0.77 | 4.70 | |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid | 369.17 | 32.89 | 4.15 | 2.00 | 4.22 | |
| Glutathione disulfide | 613.16 | 573.61 | 1.62 | 0.45 | 1.32 | |
| L-.alpha.-Amino-.gamma.-butyrolactone | 102.05 | 89.49 | 4.18 | 5.89 | 4.38 | |
| L-Aspartate | 134.04 | 421.99 | 1.48 | 1.72 | 3.27 | |
| L-Carnitine | 162.11 | 387.09 | 1.70 | 0.66 | 2.55 | |
| L-Leucine | 132.10 | 323.23 | 1.85 | 1.26 | 5.45 | |
| L-Phenylalanine | 166.09 | 322.60 | 1.64 | 1.26 | 3.08 | |
| Lumichrome | 243.09 | 62.21 | 1.01 | 0.88 | 2.51 | |
| N-Docosanoyl-4-sphingenyl-1-O-phosphorylcholine | 809.65 | 118.37 | 2.21 | 2.91 | 9.87 | |
| Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) | 664.12 | 491.16 | 1.82 | 0.37 | 6.03 | |
| Pantothenate | 220.12 | 278.37 | 3.10 | 0.52 | 6.44 | |
| PC (16 : 0/16 : 0) | 756.55 | 144.77 | 1.37 | 0.94 | 3.98 | |
| Phosphocreatine | 212.04 | 445.88 | 1.82 | 0.44 | 6.92 | |
| Phthalic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester | 279.16 | 31.75 | 4.76 | 0.88 | 4.17 | |
| Sphinganine | 302.30 | 125.24 | 1.37 | 1.42 | 1.46 | |
| Taurine | 126.02 | 297.31 | 5.11 | 0.81 | 2.94 | |
| Thioetheramide-PC | 758.57 | 144.77 | 5.66 | 0.91 | 7.10 | |
| Tyramine | 120.08 | 322.71 | 2.08 | 1.25 | 2.95 | |
| 1-Methylnicotinamide | 137.07 | 256.68 | 2.60 | 0.76 | 8.53 | |
| 1-Oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine | 544.34 | 182.66 | 1.70 | 1.19 | 9.05 | |
| 1-Stearoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerol 3-phosphocholine (SOPC) | 788.62 | 37.07 | 2.47 | 0.93 | 5.96 | |
| 1-Stearoyl-sn-glycerol | 568.34 | 184.81 | 1.35 | 1.21 | 6.54 | |
| Creatine | 132.08 | 348.95 | 1.64 | 0.61 | 5.78 | |
| Erucamide | 338.34 | 33.13 | 4.86 | 0.86 | 9.98 | |
| Ile-Thr | 233.15 | 52.99 | 1.02 | 0.60 | 8.87 | |
| Sphingomyelin (d18:1/18 : 0) | 731.60 | 120.65 | 1.50 | 1.14 | 8.86 | |
| Negative | 2E-Eicosenoic acid | 309.28 | 47.05 | 2.95 | 1.31 | 4.19 |
| 2-Oxoadipic acid | 141.02 | 228.32 | 6.48 | 0.47 | 4.34 | |
| (4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)-4,7,10,13,16,19-Docosahexaenoic acid | 327.23 | 35.15 | 5.34 | 1.64 | 8.52 | |
| Arachidonic acid (peroxide free) | 303.23 | 47.62 | 9.91 | 1.66 | 2.94 | |
| Heptadecanoic acid | 269.25 | 35.37 | 2.03 | 1.36 | 2.93 | |
| L-Proline | 114.06 | 324.79 | 1.12 | 0.60 | 2.44 | |
| Myristic acid | 227.20 | 35.15 | 2.95 | 1.19 | 3.11 | |
| N-acetyl-D-lactosamine | 442.15 | 370.14 | 1.06 | 0.70 | 1.06 | |
| Oleic acid | 281.25 | 48.74 | 11.43 | 1.27 | 4.97 | |
| Pantothenate | 218.10 | 279.08 | 3.31 | 0.38 | 1.25 | |
| Pentadecanoic acid | 241.22 | 51.09 | 3.28 | 1.28 | 4.64 | |
| Taurine | 124.01 | 297.53 | 4.03 | 0.75 | 1.23 | |
| 1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidylglycerol | 747.52 | 51.23 | 1.10 | 0.87 | 8.74 | |
| Cyanuric acid | 128.01 | 59.06 | 1.72 | 0.59 | 5.57 | |
| Dodecanoic acid | 199.17 | 6.28 | 2.18 | 1.78 | 9.90 |
Figure 6(a) Relative levels of L-proline and D-proline in the Ad-NC group and the Ad-PRODH group. (b) Heat map of the 47 differentially regulated endogenous metabolites between the Ad-NC group and the Ad-PRODH group in positive and negative ion modes. The data are presented as the mean ± SD values. ∗p < 0.05 versus the normoxia control group.
Figure 7Altered metabolic pathways between the Ad-NC group and the Ad-PRODH group. (a) Metabolism-related pathways with significant changes as determined by KEGG pathway analysis. (b) Summary of pathway analysis results related to the differentially regulated metabolites generated by MetaboAnalyst.