Literature DB >> 33293798

Assessing Knowledge and Perceptions of Alzheimer's Disease Among Employees of a Pharmaceutical Company in Spain: A Comparison Between Caregivers and Non-Caregivers.

Guillermo Garcia-Ribas1, Elena García-Arcelay2, Alonso Montoya3, Jorge Maurino2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Raising knowledge about Alzheimer's disease (AD) may help in identifying the disorder, seeking earlier appropriate healthcare, and decreasing its stigma. The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge and perceptions towards people with AD among employees of a pharmaceutical company in Spain.
METHODS: A non-interventional, cross-sectional study was conducted among 447 employees. Participants answered demographic questions and completed the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale (ADKS). Caregivers also answered questions related to their personal experience with patients with AD and completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC), and the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS).
RESULTS: Participants were mostly between 30 and 50 years old (63%), female (65.3%), and had bachelor or master degrees (82.7%). Forty-two (9.4%) of participants were caregivers, mainly of moderate to severe dementia subjects. Overall knowledge about AD was moderate (mean ADKS score = 21.2 ± 2.8 [70.6% of correct answers]). Risk factors and caregiving were the domains with lowest scores (correct answers: 58.58% and 63%, respectively). Mean total ADKS score was significantly higher in participants caring for people with AD compared with non-caregivers (22.1 ± 2.9 and 21.0 ± 2.8; p=0.02, respectively). There was no statistically significant association between total ADKS score and age, sex, educational level, or relative's AD severity. Most caregivers were satisfied with life (mean SWLS score = 26.8 ± 5.6) showing a low impact from behavioral problems (mean RMBPC reaction score = 26.81 ± 20.2). Six of them (14.3%) were scored as depressed.
CONCLUSION: There is a continuing need to improve understanding of AD to fill the gaps in knowledge of the disease, even in a population working in healthcare sector with a high educational level.
© 2020 Garcia-Ribas et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; caregivers; dementia; knowledge; pharmaceutical company

Year:  2020        PMID: 33293798      PMCID: PMC7718989          DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S282147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence        ISSN: 1177-889X            Impact factor:   2.711


Introduction

Global population growth leads to a progressive increase in the number of older people. One in four persons living in Europe and Northern America could be aged 65 or over in 2050.1 The number of persons aged 80 years or over is projected to triple, from 143 million in 2019 to 426 million in 2050.1 In this context, it is expected that the burden of chronic neurodegenerative disorders, particularly dementia, will grow exponentially becoming a major public health concern.2,3 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent type of dementia and is characterized by a progressive decline in cognitive function and an overall deterioration in function leading to a considerable burden on the individual and society.4 An adequate public knowledge of AD may help in identifying the disorder, seeking earlier appropriate healthcare and decreasing its stigma, while also opening a better informed debate about the needs of affected individuals.5,6 Unfortunately, although information about AD has been widely disseminated through numerous awareness campaigns and education programs, previous studies measuring the public’s knowledge about dementia and AD have revealed several gaps in this regard.7–10 The most common misconception is that dementia is a normal part of aging and there is a lack of clarity about the point at which normal age-related memory loss problems become severe enough to indicate dementia.7 The negative perceptions and attitudes toward AD are also harmful for their family and caregivers. Employees who simultaneously serve as an informal caregiver of disabled or elderly relatives have higher levels of home-to-work difficulties, depression, emotional exhaustion, and lower levels of job engagement compared with non-caregiver-employees.11 Over 75% of caregivers of people with AD show stress or anxiety and are more likely to develop psychological and physical disorders, social isolation, and poorer self-perceived health more frequently than the general population or age-matched controls.12,13 The latest Alzheimer’s Disease International report on stigma found that 35% of caregivers across the world had hidden the diagnosis of dementia of a family member and over 50% reported their health suffering as a result of their caring responsibilities even while expressing positive sentiments about their role.14 Limited studies have assessed the knowledge and perceptions towards people affected by AD in the workforce where many employees are balancing their careers with caregiving responsibilities.7,15 The main aim of this study was to assess levels of knowledge and perceptions about AD among employees of a pharmaceutical company. Life satisfaction, impact of memory and behavioral problems, and mood were evaluated in those participants caring for relatives with AD. In addition, comparison of AD knowledge between caregivers and non-caregivers was analyzed.

Methods

A non-interventional, cross-sectional web-based study was conducted (CONOCE study). The study was approved by the investigational review board of the Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal of Madrid (reference code: 372) and conformed with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013, concerning human and animal rights.

Population

All employees (2376) of a pharmaceutical company in Spain (Roche Diagnostics, Roche Diabetes Care Spain SL, Roche Farma S.A. and Global Infrastructure & Solutions Madrid) were invited to participate in this study in the context of the 2019 World Alzheimer’s Day. This company has been involved in the clinical development of several molecules for the treatment of AD for the last decade. Recruitment was opened between December 2, 2019 and February 3, 2020. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Procedure and Measurements

Participants answered questions regarding demographic data and completed the 30-item Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale (ADKS).16 Those participants with a first-degree relative affected with AD also answered six questions about caregiving (type of relationship, time to diagnosis, healthcare professional who made diagnosis, severity, impact, and time devoted to care) and completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS),17 the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC),18 and the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS).19 The ADKS belongs to a group of psychometric scales aiming to assess knowledge about AD to help to develop psychoeducational curricula and interventions for dementia care.16,20 It consists of 30 true or false items to assess what people know about AD covering risk factors, symptoms, assessment and diagnosis, life impact, treatment and management, caregiving, and disease course.16 The total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 30 (best). Despite some criticisms linked to dichotomous item assessment, reverse scored items, and a likely ceiling effect for some items, the ADKS is currently one of the few questionnaires with adequate psychometric properties for assessing AD knowledge among laypeople, patients, caregivers, and professionals.20,21 The SWLS is a five-item scale designed to measure global cognitive judgments of one’s life satisfaction.17 Participants indicate how much they agree or disagree with each item using a seven-point scale that ranges from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Scores between 5 and 9 indicate the respondent is extremely dissatisfied with life, whereas scores between 31 and 35 indicate the respondent is extremely satisfied. The RMBPC is a 24-item caregiver-report measure to assess behavioral problems in patients with dementia including memory-related problems, affective distress, and disruptive behaviors.18 Scores are computed for the presence or absence of each problem first, and then for caregiver “reaction” or the extent to which caregivers were “distressed” by each behavior. Frequency of behaviors is assessed based on a Likert-scale of 0 to 4 (never occurs to occurs daily or more often). The caregivers’ reactions to each behavior are also scored on a four-point scale (not at all to extremely). Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived caregiver burden. The BDI-FS is a seven-item questionnaire assessing the level of depressive symptoms.19 Responses to the items are provided on a four-point scale (no symptoms to severe symptoms). Total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. Cut-off scores ≥4 and ≥9 are used to define the presence of depression and moderate-to-severe depression, respectively. All questionnaires were administered in Spanish and English.

Statistical Analyses

Sociodemographic characteristics and total scores on the scales (i.e., ADKS, SWLS, RMBPC and BDI-FS) are expressed as mean and standard deviation. Descriptive analyses were performed using frequencies and percentages for qualitative variables. Student’s t-test was used to compare the ADKS score between two groups or ANOVA in the case of three or more groups. Missing data were not considered in the analyses and a significance level of 0.05 was used for statistical testing. The SPSS statistical package version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Study Participants

Four hundred forty-seven subjects participated in the study. Most participants were between 30 and 50 years old (63.3%), female (65.3%), and had a bachelor’s or master’s degree (82.7%). Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Sample

Total Sample (n=447) N %Non-Caregivers (n=405) N %Caregivers (n=42) N %p-value
Gender
 Female29265.326264.73071.40.49
 Male15534.714335.31228.6
Age
 30 years old and under6614.8651612.90.002
 31 to 40 years old11325.310826.7511.9
 41 to 50 years old17038.0150372047.6
 51 to 60 years old9320.877191638.1
 Over 60 years old54.751.200
Education
 Secondary235.1204.937.10.02
 Vocational training265.8235.737.1
 Bachelor’s degree or equivalent16737.414435.52354.7
 Master’s degree or equivalent20345.419347.61023.8
 PhD or equivalent286.3256.237.1
Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Sample Forty-two (9.4%) participants reported having a first-degree relative with AD, with the mother being the most frequent relative affected (40%). Most of them (66.7%) reported that informal caregiving activities did not or partially affected their social life or work with less than 10 hours per week providing assistance. Background and experience with people with AD are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Background and Impact of Caregivers (N=42)

N (%)
Relative with AD
 Mother17 (40.4)
 Father12 (28.6)
AD severity
 Mild11 (26.2)
 Moderate8 (19.1)
 Severe23 (54.8)
Place of residence
 Own home27 (64.3)
 Caregiver home1 (2.4)
 Other relatives home4 (9.5)
 Nursing home10 (23.8)
Time to diagnosis
 6 months – 1 year11 (26.2)
 1–2 years16 (38.1)
 More than 2 years12 (28.6)
 Unknown3 (7.1)
Healthcare professional who made the diagnosis
 General Practitioner4 (9.5)
 Neurologist33 (78.6)
 Geriatrician4 (9.5)
 Psychiatrist1 (2.4)
Hours per week of providing assistance
 1–522 (52.4)
 6–1010 (23.8)
 11–154 (9.5)
 More than 206 (14.3)
Caregiver work/social life affected
 Not affected18 (23.8)
 Partially affected18 (42.9)
 Very affected6 (14.3)

Abbreviation: AD, Alzheimer’s disease.

Background and Impact of Caregivers (N=42) Abbreviation: AD, Alzheimer’s disease.

Knowledge About AD

The overall mean score of dementia knowledge as measured by the ADKS was 21.2 ± 2.8 out of 30 (70.5% correct). Participants scored particularly high in the ADKS domains of treatment management and life impact (Table 3). Knowledge about risk factors and caregiving were the domains with the lowest scores (58.6 and 63% of correct answers, respectively).
Table 3

Content Domains of the Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale (n=447)

ADKS DomainsNumber of Items% of Correct Answers
Treatment and management484.3
Life impact380.0
Course477.7
Symptoms476.2
Diagnosis and assessment464.0
Caregiving563.0
Risk factors658.6

Abbreviation: ADKS, Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale.

Content Domains of the Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale (n=447) Abbreviation: ADKS, Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale. Mean total ADKS score was significantly higher in participants caring for people with AD compared with non-caregivers (22.1 ± 2.9 and 21.0 ± 2.8; p=0.02, respectively). Caregivers showed a better AD knowledge in 20 of the 30 items of the ADKS than non-caregivers, mainly in symptoms, assessment and diagnosis, and course domains (Table 4). There was no statistically significant association between total ADKS score and age, sex, educational level, or relative’s AD severity.
Table 4

Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale: Comparison of Correct Answers Between AD Caregivers and Non-Caregivers

% Correct AnswersCaregivers (n=42)Non-Caregivers (n=405)p-value
1 People with Alzheimer’s disease are particularly prone to depression85.7172.840.12
2 It has been scientifically proven that mental exercise can prevent a person from getting Alzheimer’s disease92.8623.461.00
3 After symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease appear, the average life expectancy is 6 to 12 years80.9555.800.71
4 When a person with Alzheimer’s disease becomes agitated, a medical examination might reveal other health problems that caused the agitation35.7161.980.03
5 People with Alzheimer’s disease do best with simple, instructions given one step at a time97.6296.300.002
6 When people with Alzheimer’s disease begin to have difficulty taking care of themselves, caregivers should take over right away28.5733.831.00
7 If a person with Alzheimer’s disease becomes alert and agitated at night, a good strategy is to try to make sure that the person gets plenty of physical activity during the day90.4862.470.04
8 In rare cases, people have recovered from Alzheimer’s disease66.6788.150.60
9 People whose Alzheimer’s disease is not yet severe can benefit from psychotherapy for depression and anxiety80.9590.370.13
10 If trouble with memory and confused thinking appears suddenly, it is likely due to Alzheimer’s disease80.9562.220.17
11 Most people with Alzheimer’s disease live in nursing homes92.8675.310.06
12 Poor nutrition can make the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease worse76.1986.670.008
13 People in their 30s can have Alzheimer’s disease83.3375.310.06
14 A person with Alzheimer’s disease becomes increasingly likely to fall down as the disease gets worse19.0583.460.35
15 When people with Alzheimer’s disease repeat the same question or story several times, it is helpful to remind them that they are repeating themselves92.8676.300.84
16 Once people have Alzheimer’s disease, they are no longer capable of making informed decisions about their own care100.046.420.19
17 Eventually, a person with Alzheimer’s disease will need 24-hour supervision97.6280.000.002
18 Having high cholesterol may increase a person’s risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease80.9533.830.18
19 Tremor or shaking of the hands or arms is a common symptom in people with Alzheimer’s disease85.7174.570.01
20 Symptoms of severe depression can be mistaken for symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease92.8664.200.71
21 Alzheimer’s disease is one type of dementia80.9564.940.38
22 Trouble handling money or paying bills is a common early symptom of Alzheimer’s disease35.7174.320.34
23 One symptom that can occur with Alzheimer’s disease is believing that other people are stealing one’s things97.6272.840.06
24 When a person has Alzheimer’s disease, using reminder notes is a crutch that can contribute to decline28.5766.420.86
25 Prescription drugs that prevent Alzheimer’s disease are available90.4892.590.02
26 Having high blood pressure may increase a person’s risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease66.6734.810.45
27 Genes can only partially account for the development of Alzheimer’s disease80.9591.360.22
28 It is safe for people with Alzheimer’s disease to drive, as long as they have a companion in the car at all times80.9591.361.00
29 Alzheimer’s disease cannot be cured92.8694.570.17
30 Most people with Alzheimer’s disease remember recent events better than things that happened in the past76.1979.010.56
Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale: Comparison of Correct Answers Between AD Caregivers and Non-Caregivers Most of the caregivers (73.8%) reported a high level of satisfaction with their current life. The mean SWLS score was 26.8 ± 5.6. Memory impairment was the most common behavioral problem. However, depression-related problem was the most distressful behavior among caregivers (Table 5). The mean BDI-FS score was low (1.6 ± 2.6). However, six caregivers (14%) were scored as depressed. Most were aged between 30 and 50, female and had a relative with severe AD. No correlation was found between the presence of depressive symptoms and relative’s AD severity (ANOVA p=0.83).
Table 5

Satisfaction with Life, Impact of Memory and Behavioral Problems, and Mood in Participants Caring for People with Alzheimer’s Disease

Measurements
SWLSN%
 Extremely satisfied1638.1
 Satisfied1535.7
 Slightly satisfied-neutral716.7
 Slightly dissatisfied24.8
 Dissatisfied24.8
RMBPCMean (SD)Min-Max Range
Frequency scores
 Memory-related problems16.6 (9.5)0–28
 Affective distress10.7 (10.5)0–36
 Disruptive behaviors9.1 (9.1)0–32
Total score36.4 (25.7)0–92
Reaction scores
 Memory-related problems6.4 (5.4)0–19
 Affective distress11.5 (9.9)0–33
 Disruptive behaviors8.9 (8.1)0–27
Total score26.8 (20.2)0–74
BDI-FSN%
 0–33685.7
 4–849.5
 ≥ 924.8

Abbreviations: BDI-FS, Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen; RMBPC, Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist; SD, standard deviation; SWLS, Satisfaction with Life Scale.

Satisfaction with Life, Impact of Memory and Behavioral Problems, and Mood in Participants Caring for People with Alzheimer’s Disease Abbreviations: BDI-FS, Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen; RMBPC, Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist; SD, standard deviation; SWLS, Satisfaction with Life Scale.

Discussion

This study assessed knowledge of AD in a sample of people with a predominately high educational level working in a pharmaceutical company in Spain. Despite generally good knowledge, risk factors and prevention of AD were noteworthy gaps. Our results are consistent with previous studies7,22–24 In a systematic review of 40 studies addressing the public’s knowledge of AD, Cahill et al found a poor to very limited level of AD literacy.7 The most common correlates of knowledge investigated were age, sex, and education. Higher levels of knowledge were found among younger persons, women, and better educated people. Risk factors and prevention were the knowledge domains with the most common identified gaps.7 Jorge et al found a poor knowledge of AD in a sample of 215 informal caregivers and 204 individuals from the general population in Spain.22 Questions related to risk factors and caregiving had the highest rate of errors. Krempel-Amado et al found a moderate knowledge of AD in a survey including 1414 people in Brazil (mean ADKS score = 21.6).23 The scores were positively influenced by educational level, professional skills (better for health professionals, mainly physicians) and by age (younger than 65 years). Healthcare professionals also show knowledge gaps about AD, with risk factors and disease course being the most frequent identified gaps.23 Caring for someone with dementia is a complex, multi-disciplinary task requiring the involvement of families, healthcare professionals, and social services and generates higher levels of stress and anxiety than caring for patients with other chronic disabling diseases.25,26 In our study, a total of 42 (9.4%) participants reported being informal caregivers of first-degree relatives with AD. They showed a better knowledge of AD compared with non-caregivers as measured by the ADKS. Interestingly, different findings were reported in the literature. Jorge et al did not find significant differences between caregivers and non-caregivers for overall mean ADKS score (19.2 vs. 18.9, respectively; p=0.97).22 Being a caregiver or family member also did not influence knowledge about the disease in a study conducted in Brazil.23 Older adults and caregivers knew less than healthcare professionals but were more knowledgeable than senior center staff and undergraduate students in a study involving 794 people in the UK.24 While research has not yet discovered disease-modifying agents in AD, there is a robust evidence about the potential to prevent cases of dementia with early management of risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, high body mass index, or diabetes.27–29 However, knowledge about the potential for dementia prevention and treatment is poor.30,31 Nearly half of respondents agreed that dementia is a normal part of aging and is not preventable in a recent systematic review of 34 studies conducted predominantly in Europe and the US.31 The role of cardiovascular risk factors was poorly understood overall. Because the risk of getting dementia increases with age, people living with dementia are likely to experience a “double stigma”.14 Information and knowledge about AD are needed because the ignorance around dementia results in discrimination, loss of rights and perpetuates negative beliefs towards those affected by the disease.14,31 This study has several limitations. First, there is self-selection bias in participants and it is possible that the most motivated or more knowledgeable respondents about AD may have completed the survey. Second, no questionnaires on dementia knowledge have been developed or culturally adapted into Spanish-speaking countries. Therefore, we had to use a non-validated Spanish version of the ADKS. In addition, this scale lacks a cut-off for the minimum acceptable level of knowledge. Third, it is also likely that many people mixed the terms AD and dementia. Finally, carrying out the study in only one pharmaceutical company may limit the generalizability of the findings to other healthcare communities or even the general population. Despite these limitations, our study shows a valuable sample of participants with a wide spectrum of age, level of education, and experience in caregiving people with AD.

Conclusion

Misconceptions about AD in the general population have been present for many years. This study assessed the knowledge and perceptions about AD from the caregiver and non-caregiver perspectives in the workplace. Understanding the modifiable risk factors for AD may encourage early preventative health behaviors and ultimately reduce late-life incidence and its associated costs. Therefore, there is a critical need for more public health campaigns to fill knowledge gaps even in young populations with a high educational level.
  27 in total

Review 1.  The work-family interface: A retrospective look at 20 years of research in JOHP.

Authors:  Tammy D Allen; Angela Martin
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2017-02-02

2.  Perceptions of dementia amongst the general public across Latin America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas Farina; Claudia K Suemoto; Jenni K Burton; Déborah Oliveira; Rachael Frost
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.658

3.  The Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale: development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Brian D Carpenter; Steve Balsis; Poorni G Otilingam; Priya K Hanson; Margaret Gatz
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-03-25

4.  A grounded theory study to identify caregiving phases and support needs across the Alzheimer's disease trajectory.

Authors:  Kristina M Kokorelias; Monique A M Gignac; Gary Naglie; Nira Rittenberg; Jennifer MacKenzie; Samantha D'Souza; Jill I Cameron
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 6.  Illness representations of dementia: a scoping review.

Authors:  Shiri Shinan-Altman; Perla Werner
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Experiences of dementia and attitude towards prevention: a qualitative study among older adults participating in a prevention trial.

Authors:  Anna Rosenberg; Nicola Coley; Alexandra Soulier; Jenni Kulmala; Hilkka Soininen; Sandrine Andrieu; Miia Kivipelto; Mariagnese Barbera
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010.

Authors:  Anders Wimo; Maëlenn Guerchet; Gemma-Claire Ali; Yu-Tzu Wu; A Matthew Prina; Bengt Winblad; Linus Jönsson; Zhaorui Liu; Martin Prince
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 21.566

9.  Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin-Tai Yu; Wei Xu; Chen-Chen Tan; Sandrine Andrieu; John Suckling; Evangelos Evangelou; An Pan; Can Zhang; Jianping Jia; Lei Feng; Ee-Heok Kua; Yan-Jiang Wang; Hui-Fu Wang; Meng-Shan Tan; Jie-Qiong Li; Xiao-He Hou; Yu Wan; Lin Tan; Vincent Mok; Lan Tan; Qiang Dong; Jacques Touchon; Serge Gauthier; Paul S Aisen; Bruno Vellas
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 10.  Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.

Authors:  Gill Livingston; Jonathan Huntley; Andrew Sommerlad; David Ames; Clive Ballard; Sube Banerjee; Carol Brayne; Alistair Burns; Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Claudia Cooper; Sergi G Costafreda; Amit Dias; Nick Fox; Laura N Gitlin; Robert Howard; Helen C Kales; Mika Kivimäki; Eric B Larson; Adesola Ogunniyi; Vasiliki Orgeta; Karen Ritchie; Kenneth Rockwood; Elizabeth L Sampson; Quincy Samus; Lon S Schneider; Geir Selbæk; Linda Teri; Naaheed Mukadam
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantifying Knowledge of Alzheimer's Disease: An Analysis of the Psychometric Properties of the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Ribas; Elena García-Arcelay; Alonso Montoya; Jorge Maurino; Javier Ballesteros
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2021-01-29

2.  Ethnic Differences in Attitudes and Preventive Behaviors Related to Alzheimer's Disease in the Israeli Survey of Aging.

Authors:  Efrat Neter; Svetlana Chachashvili-Bolotin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.