| Literature DB >> 33293561 |
Haiyun Liang1,2, Keke He1,2, Ting Li1,2, Shumei Cui1,2, Meng Tang1,2, Shaoyi Kang1,2, Wei Ma1,2, Liya Song3,4.
Abstract
Vine tea (Ampelopsis grossedentata) has been approved as a new food ingredient in 2013. Both vine tea extract (VTE) and its active ingredient, 2R, 3R-Dihydromyricetin (DMY), showed good antibacterial activity. The mechanism of VTE and DMY against Staphylococcus aureus were evaluated by morphology observation, cell membrane and wall assay, protein assay, and DNA assay in this study. The results of SEM and TEM revealed that the VTE and DMY changed the morphology of S. aureus. The leakage of AKPase and β-galactosidase in treated groups demonstrated that the membrane integrity of S. aureus was disrupted. Meanwhile, the results of protein assay showed that VTE and DMY inhibited the expression of total proteins, and decreased activities of a few energy metabolism enzymes, total ATPase. Moreover, spectral and competitive analysis revealed that VTE and DMY interacted with DNA by groove and intercalation binding. Finally, the suspension experiments of Chinese cabbage and barley showed that inhibitors had strong inhibitory effect on bacteria growth. Overall, the results suggested that VTE and DMY may be potential food preservatives for inhibiting pathogen.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33293561 PMCID: PMC7722850 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78379-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The structural of DMY (Version number: ChemOffice Professional 19, URL link: https://www.chemdraw.com.cn/product.html).
Figure 2The HPLC of VTE (14.030 min) and DMY (11.958 min).
Figure 3The effect of inhibitors on the growth Curve of S. aureus.
Figure 4Morphological structure of S. aureus observed by SEM, untreated (A); VTE treatment 12 h (B); DMY treatment 12 h (C).
Figure 5Morphological structure of S. aureus observed by TEM, untreated (A); VTE treatment 12 h (B); DMY treatment 12 h (C).
Figure 6Changes of extracellular AKPase content of S. aureus after 12 h of treatment with VTE and DMY (A); Changes of extracellular β-galactosidase content in S. aureus treated with VTE and DMY for 12 h (B).
Figure 7Changes of intracellular protein content in S. aureus treated with inhibitor (A). SDS-PAGE electrophoresis diagram of S. aureus under the action of inhibitor: 1. Negative control; 2. DMY-6 h; 3. DMY-24 h; 4. VTE-6 h; 5. VTE-24 h (B). Activity of key enzymes in Energy Metabolism of S. aureus treated with Inhibitors for 12 h (C).
Figure 8Effect of S. aureus Genomic DNA on Ultraviolet Spectra of VTE and DMY (A,B). Effect of S. aureus Genomic DNA on fluorescence Spectra of VTE and DMY (C,D).
Figure 9Effect of fluorescence intensity of VTE, DMY versus EB-S. Aureus genomic DNA system (A,B). Effect of fluorescence intensity of VTE, DMY versus DAPI-S. Aureus genomic DNA system (C,D).
Figure 10Statistical figure of bacterial colonies in the Challenge of anticorrosion of Chinese Cabbage Juice (A). Statistical figure of bacterial colonies in the Challenge of anticorrosion of wort Food (B).
The mechanism of VTE and DMY.
| Mechanism | VTE (%) | DMY (%) |
|---|---|---|
| The extracellular AKPase | + 21.8 | + 10.3 |
| The extracellular β-galactosidase | + 90.2 | + 57.4 |
| MDH | − 12.7 | − 4.7 |
| SDH | − 65.8 | − 16.7 |
| Totle ATPase | − 31.5 | − 15.9 |
| The total protein expression | + 15.5 | + 9.9 |