Literature DB >> 33293425

Optimal Timing for Cancer Screening and Adaptive Surveillance Using Mathematical Modeling.

Kit Curtius1,2, Anup Dewanji3, William D Hazelton4, Joel H Rubenstein5,6, Georg E Luebeck4.   

Abstract

Cancer screening and early detection efforts have been partially successful in reducing incidence and mortality, but many improvements are needed. Although current medical practice is informed by epidemiologic studies and experts, the decisions for guidelines are ultimately ad hoc. We propose here that quantitative optimization of protocols can potentially increase screening success and reduce overdiagnosis. Mathematical modeling of the stochastic process of cancer evolution can be used to derive and optimize the timing of clinical screens so that the probability is maximal that a patient is screened within a certain "window of opportunity" for intervention when early cancer development may be observable. Alternative to a strictly empirical approach or microsimulations of a multitude of possible scenarios, biologically based mechanistic modeling can be used for predicting when best to screen and begin adaptive surveillance. We introduce a methodology for optimizing screening, assessing potential risks, and quantifying associated costs to healthcare using multiscale models. As a case study in Barrett's esophagus, these methods were applied for a model of esophageal adenocarcinoma that was previously calibrated to U.S. cancer registry data. Optimal screening ages for patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease were older (58 for men and 64 for women) than what is currently recommended (age > 50 years). These ages are in a cost-effective range to start screening and were independently validated by data used in current guidelines. Collectively, our framework captures critical aspects of cancer evolution within patients with Barrett's esophagus for a more personalized screening design. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates how mathematical modeling of cancer evolution can be used to optimize screening regimes, with the added potential to improve surveillance regimes. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/81/4/1123/F1.large.jpg. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33293425     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of benefits and harms of adaptive screening schedules for lung cancer: A microsimulation study.

Authors:  Pianpian Cao; Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 1.687

2.  A mathematical model of ctDNA shedding predicts tumor detection size.

Authors:  Stefano Avanzini; David M Kurtz; Jacob J Chabon; Everett J Moding; Sharon Seiko Hori; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Ash A Alizadeh; Maximilian Diehn; Johannes G Reiter
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Computational modelling suggests that Barrett's oesophagus may be the precursor of all oesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Joel H Rubenstein; Amitabh Chak; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 31.793

4.  An integrated framework for quantifying immune-tumour interactions in a 3D co-culture model.

Authors:  Gheed Al-Hity; FengWei Yang; Eduard Campillo-Funollet; Andrew E Greenstein; Hazel Hunt; Myrthe Mampay; Haya Intabli; Marta Falcinelli; Anotida Madzvamuse; Chandrasekhar Venkataraman; Melanie S Flint
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.