| Literature DB >> 33291293 |
Hyoyeon Ahn1, Yongse Kim1, Jaeuk Jeong1, Youngho So2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the change of fitness level and mood states in the basic military training (BMT) for midshipmen using latent growth model analysis. A total of 285 midshipmen were selected as participants in BMT. The results were as follow: First, the slope of low initial fitness level increase higher than high initial fitness level. Second, there is no significant on relation between the slope of total mood disturbance score (TMD) and initial TMD level. Third, initial fitness level might increase the difference in participants' mood state. To Sum up, participants in low initial fitness level scored lower on the results of initial TMD than people in high initial fitness level, and the rate of change in TMD of the stronger participants was larger than the others. Thus, we suggested that to consideration not only fitness level but also psychological, social aspect during in BMT.Entities:
Keywords: basic military training (BMT); latent growth model; mood state; physical fitness level; total mood disturbance score
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33291293 PMCID: PMC7730406 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17239115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of participants.
| Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 270 | 15 |
| Age | 18.83 (±0.76) | 18.18 (±0.54) |
| BMI | 21.95 | 21.65 |
Scoring and conversion formula for military fitness test.
| Test Event | Conversion Formula | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push-ups | M | (record-45) × 0.5 + 2.5 | 25 |
| F | (record-21) × 0.6 + 2.5 | ||
| Sit-ups | M | (record-52) × 0.7 + 3.0 | 30 |
| F | (record-33) × 0.6 + 3.0 | ||
| 3000 m running | M | (845-record) × 0.23 + 4.5 | 45 |
| F | (980-record) × 0.21 + 4.5 | ||
Descriptive statistics for each measurement category.
| Variable | Mean | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Push-ups | 1st | 42.75 | 0.823 | ||
| 3rd | 52.50 | 0.992 | |||
| 5th | 62.21 | 0.933 | |||
| Sit-ups | 1st | 52.52 | 0.841 | ||
| 3rd | 59.53 | 0.832 | |||
| 5th | 63.31 | 0.741 | |||
| 3000 m Running | 1st | 936.09 | 7.170 | ||
| 3rd | 834.44 | 5.433 | |||
| 5th | 774.85 | 4.734 | |||
| Tension | 1st | 2.461 | 0.048 | 0.101 | −0.470 |
| 3rd | 2.239 | 0.053 | 0.365 | −0.487 | |
| 5th | 2.068 | 0.054 | 0.603 | −0.306 | |
| Depression | 1st | 2.108 | 0.053 | 0.587 | −0.434 |
| 3rd | 2.060 | 0.055 | 0.583 | −0.593 | |
| 5th | 1.886 | 0.053 | 0.827 | −0.235 | |
| Anger | 1st | 2.055 | 0.046 | 0.529 | −0.325 |
| 3rd | 2.131 | 0.052 | 0.487 | −0.445 | |
| 5th | 2.000 | 0.048 | 0.544 | −0.431 | |
| Vigor | 1st | 2.813 | 0.046 | 0.310 | −0.107 |
| 3rd | 2.921 | 0.055 | 0.265 | −0.252 | |
| 5th | 2.833 | 0.058 | 0.494 | 0.323 | |
| Fatigue | 1st | 2.587 | 0.046 | 0.218 | −0.108 |
| 3rd | 2.695 | 0.052 | 0.238 | −0.310 | |
| 5th | 2.549 | 0.055 | 0.261 | −0.419 | |
| Confusion | 1st | 2.553 | 0.048 | 0.165 | −0.429 |
| 3rd | 2.081 | 0.050 | 0.695 | 0.113 | |
| 5th | 1.934 | 0.048 | 0.732 | −0.061 | |
Changes in fitness scores per measurement period.
| Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −6.308 | 1.762 | −3.580 | <0.001 | ||
| Slope | 33.487 | 0.930 | 36.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Implied means | week1 | week3 | week5 | |||
| −6.308 | 27.179 | 47.575 | ||||
| Model fit | χ2 ( | 55.275 (2) | ||||
| NFI | 0.926 | |||||
| CFI | 0.928 | |||||
| RMSEA | 0.298 | |||||
Figure 1Fitness score model goodness of fit test results. *** p < 0.001.
Latent growth model analysis of changes in POMS.
| Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 8.953 | 0.234 | 38.230 | <0.001 | |||
| Slope | −0.680 | 0.126 | −5.386 | <0.001 | |||
| Implied means | week 1 | week 3 | week 5 | ||||
| 8.953 | 8.273 | 7.593 | |||||
| Model fit | x2 ( | 10.238 (3) | |||||
| NFI | 0.966 | ||||||
| CFI | 0.976 | ||||||
| RMSEA | 0.090 | ||||||
Figure 2Latent growth model of TMD.
Changes in TMD over time per fitness levels.
| Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 8.838 | 0.237 | 37.328 | <0.001 | |||
| Slope | −0.623 | 0.128 | −4.875 | <0.001 | |||
| Implied means | week 1 | week 3 | week 5 | ||||
| 8.953 | 8.273 | 7.593 | |||||
| Model fit | x2 ( | 10.488 (4) | |||||
| NFI | 0.966 | ||||||
| CFI | 0.978 | ||||||
| RMSEA | 0.074 | ||||||
Figure 3Changes in TMD score per fitness levels, model goodness of fit results.