Literature DB >> 33291247

Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge.

Magdalena Zielińska1, Katarzyna Bernat1, Wioleta Mikucka1.   

Abstract

Although the membrane bioreactor technology is gaining increasing interest because of high efficiency of wastewater treatment and reuse, data on the anaerobic transformations of retentate are scarce and divergent. The effects of transmembrane pressure (TMP) in microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) on the pollutant rejection, susceptibility of ceramic membrane to fouling, hydraulic parameters of membrane module, and biogas productivity of retentate were determined. Irrespective of the membrane cut-off and TMP (0.2-0.4 MPa), 97.4 ± 0.7% of COD (chemical oxygen demand), 89.0 ± 4.1% of total nitrogen, and 61.4 ± 0.5% of total phosphorus were removed from municipal wastewater and the permeates can be reused for irrigation. Despite smaller pore diameter, UF membrane was more hydraulically efficient. MF membrane had 1.4-4.6 times higher filtration resistances than UF membrane. In MF and UF, an increase in TMP resulted in an increase in permeate flux. Despite complete retention of suspended solids, strong shearing forces in the membrane installation changed the kinetics of biogas production from retentate in comparison to the kinetics obtained when excess sludge from a secondary clarifier was anaerobically processed. MF retentates had 1.15 to 1.28 times lower cumulative biogas production than the excess sludge. Processing of MF and UF retentates resulted in about 60% elongation of period in which 90% of the cumulative biogas production was achieved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MBR; biogas production; membrane fouling; microfiltration; municipal wastewater; ultrafiltration

Year:  2020        PMID: 33291247      PMCID: PMC7762199          DOI: 10.3390/membranes10120397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Membranes (Basel)        ISSN: 2077-0375


  19 in total

1.  Effect of pump shear on the performance of a crossflow membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  J S Kim; C H Lee; I S Chang
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Specific energy consumption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) for sewage treatment.

Authors:  Pawel Krzeminski; Jaap H J M van der Graaf; Jules B van Lier
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.915

Review 3.  Application of membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse in the Mediterranean region: focusing on removal efficiency of non-conventional pollutants.

Authors:  David Bolzonella; Francesco Fatone; Silvia di Fabio; Franco Cecchi
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 4.  The status of membrane bioreactor technology.

Authors:  Simon Judd
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 5.  Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material.

Authors:  Fangang Meng; So-Ryong Chae; Anja Drews; Matthias Kraume; Hang-Sik Shin; Fenglin Yang
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential.

Authors:  Jin M Triolo; Sven G Sommer; Henrik B Møller; Martin R Weisbjerg; Xin Y Jiang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 7.  Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: A critical review.

Authors:  Kang Xiao; Shuai Liang; Xiaomao Wang; Chunsheng Chen; Xia Huang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 9.642

8.  Microbiological aspects of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal wastewater.

Authors:  R Witzig; W Manz; S Rosenbergerb; U Krügerb; M Kraumeb; U Szewzyk
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Community dynamics of denitrifying bacteria in full-scale wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Magdalena Zielińska; Paulina Rusanowska; Joanna Jarząbek; Jeppe Lund Nielsen
Journal:  Environ Technol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.247

10.  Increased solubilization of excess sludge does not always result in enhanced anaerobic digestion efficiency.

Authors:  Dong-Hoon Kim; Si-Kyung Cho; Mo-Kwon Lee; Mi-Sun Kim
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 9.642

View more
  3 in total

1.  New Low-Cost Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes for Bacteria Removal.

Authors:  Olivier Mountoumnjou; Anthony Szymczyk; Emilia Enjema Lyonga Mbambyah; Dayirou Njoya; Antoine Elimbi
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30

2.  Coupling of Immobilized Photosynthetic Bacteria with a Graphene Oxides/PSF Composite Membrane for Textile Wastewater Treatment: Biodegradation Performance and Membrane Anti-Fouling Behavior.

Authors:  Jing Cheng; Xiaofeng Wu; Binbin Jin; Chenchen Zhang; Rongwei Zheng; Lei Qin
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  Direct Purification of Digestate Using Ultrafiltration Membranes: Influence of Pore Size on Filtration Behavior and Fouling Characteristics.

Authors:  Caide Yue; Hongmin Dong; Yongxing Chen; Bin Shang; Yi Wang; Shunli Wang; Zhiping Zhu
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.