Literature DB >> 33291159

Factors associated with complete clip closure after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps.

Heiko Pohl1,2, Maria Pellisé3,4, Oswaldo Ortiz5, Douglas K Rex6, Ian S Grimm7, Matthew T Moyer8, Muhammad K Hasan9, Douglas Pleskow10, B Joseph Elmunzer11, Mouen A Khashab12, Omid Sanaei12, Firas H Al-Kawas13, Stuart R Gordon14,1, Abraham Mathew8, John M Levenick8, Harry R Aslanian15, Fadi Antaki16, Daniel von Renteln17, Seth D Crockett7, Amit Rastogi18, Jeffrey A Gill19, Ryan Law20, Michael B Wallace21, Pooja A Elias11, Todd A MacKenzie22.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM : Delayed bleeding is a common adverse event following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal polyps. Prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of nonpedunculated polyps larger than 20 mm reduces the incidence of severe delayed bleeding, especially in proximal polyps. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with complete prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of large polyps. METHODS : This is a post hoc analysis of the CLIP study (NCT01936948). All patients randomized to the clip group were included. Main outcome was complete clip closure of the mucosal resection defect. The defect was considered completely closed when no remaining mucosal defect was visible and clips were less than 1 cm apart. Factors associated with complete closure were evaluated in multivariable analysis. RESULTS : In total, 458 patients (age 65, 58 % men) with 494 large polyps were included. Complete clip closure of the resection defect was achieved for 338 polyps (68.4 %); closure was not complete for 156 (31.6 %). Factors associated with complete closure in adjusted analysis were smaller polyp size (odds ratio 1.06 for every millimeter decrease [95 % confidence interval 1.02-1.08]), good access (OR 3.58 [1.94-9.59]), complete submucosal lifting (OR 2.28 [1.36-3.90]), en bloc resection (OR 5.75 [1.48-22.39]), and serrated histology (OR 2.74 [1.35-5.56]). CONCLUSIONS : Complete clip closure was not achieved for almost one in three resected large nonpedunculated polyps. While stable access and en bloc resection facilitate clip closure, most factors associated with clip closure are not modifiable. This highlights the need for alternative closure options and measures to prevent bleeding. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33291159     DOI: 10.1055/a-1332-6727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   9.776


  3 in total

1.  Prevention of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding by prophylactic clipping after endoscopic colorectal polypectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Yu; Eduardo Albéniz; Jing Hu; Peilin Li; Quan Li; Yaojun Hu; Jinpin Chen; Jinpeng Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 2.  Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harshal S Mandavdhare; M Praveen Kumar; Dayakrishna Jha; Antriksh Kumar; Vishal Sharma; Pankaj Desai; Lada Shumkina; Pankaj Gupta; Harjeet Singh; Usha Dutta
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.230

Review 3.  Prevention of late complications with coverage agents in endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions: Current landscape in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga; Marco Bustamante-Balén; Vicente Pons-Beltrán
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.