Literature DB >> 33290107

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted motion capture for medical applications: a comparative study between markerless and passive marker motion capture.

Iwori Takeda1, Atsushi Yamada1, Hiroshi Onodera1.   

Abstract

We aimed to determine whether artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted markerless motion capture software is useful in the clinical medicine and rehabilitation fields. Currently, it is unclear whether the AI-assisted markerless method can be applied to individuals with lower limb dysfunction, such as those using an ankle foot orthosis or a crutch. However, as many patients with lower limb paralysis and foot orthosis users lose metatarsophalangeal (MP) joint flexion during the stance phase, it is necessary to estimate the accuracy of foot recognition under fixed MP joint motion. The hip, knee, and ankle joint angles during treadmill walking were determined using OpenPose (a markerless method) and the conventional passive marker motion capture method; the results from both methods were compared. We also examined whether an ankle foot orthosis and a crutch could influence the recognition ability of OpenPose. The hip and knee joint data obtained by the passive marker method (MAC3D), OpenPose, and manual video analysis using Kinovea software showed significant correlation. Compared with the ankle joint data obtained by OpenPose and Kinovea, which were strongly correlated, those obtained by MAC3D presented a weaker correlation. OpenPose can be an adequate substitute for conventional passive marker motion capture for both normal gait and abnormal gait with an orthosis or a crutch. Furthermore, OpenPose is applicable to patients with impaired MP joint motion. The use of OpenPose can reduce the complexity and cost associated with conventional passive marker motion capture without compromising recognition accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; OpenPose; gait analysis; markerless motion capture; metatarsophalangeal joint

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33290107     DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1856372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  5 in total

1.  Identifying the Posture of Young Adults in Walking Videos by Using a Fusion Artificial Intelligent Method.

Authors:  Posen Lee; Tai-Been Chen; Chin-Hsuan Liu; Chi-Yuan Wang; Guan-Hua Huang; Nan-Han Lu
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03

2.  Automatic Markerless Motion Detector Method against Traditional Digitisation for 3-Dimensional Movement Kinematic Analysis of Ball Kicking in Soccer Field Context.

Authors:  Luiz H Palucci Vieira; Paulo R P Santiago; Allan Pinto; Rodrigo Aquino; Ricardo da S Torres; Fabio A Barbieri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  A SWOT Analysis of Portable and Low-Cost Markerless Motion Capture Systems to Assess Lower-Limb Musculoskeletal Kinematics in Sport.

Authors:  Cortney Armitano-Lago; Dominic Willoughby; Adam W Kiefer
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-01-25

4.  Applications and limitations of current markerless motion capture methods for clinical gait biomechanics.

Authors:  Logan Wade; Laurie Needham; Polly McGuigan; James Bilzon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Algorithm based on one monocular video delivers highly valid and reliable gait parameters.

Authors:  Arash Azhand; Sophie Rabe; Swantje Müller; Igor Sattler; Anika Heimann-Steinert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.