Seetal Dodd1,2,3,4, Michael Bauer5, Andre F Carvalho1,6, Harris Eyre1,7, Maurizio Fava8, Siegfried Kasper9, Sidney H Kennedy10, Jon-Paul Khoo11, Carlos Lopez Jaramillo12, Gin S Malhi13,14,15, Roger S McIntyre6,16,17, Philip B Mitchell18, Angela Marianne Paredes Castro1, Aswin Ratheesh4,19, Emanuel Severus5, Trisha Suppes20, Madhukar H Trivedi21, Michael E Thase22, Lakshmi N Yatham23, Allan H Young24, Michael Berk1,2,3,4,19,25. 1. IMPACT - the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Barwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Australia. 4. Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada. 7. Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 8. Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 9. Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 10. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto and Centre for Depression and Suicide Studies, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 11. Toowong Specialist Clinic, Toowong, Australia. 12. Department of Psychiatry, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. 13. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 14. Academic Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia. 15. CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia. 16. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto, Canada. 17. Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, Canada. 18. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia. 19. Orygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia. 20. VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 21. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 22. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 23. Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 24. Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London & South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, Kent, UK. 25. The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder is a common, recurrent, disabling and costly disorder that is often severe and/or chronic, and for which non-remission on guideline concordant first-line antidepressant treatment is the norm. A sizeable percentage of patients diagnosed with MDD do not achieve full remission after receiving antidepressant treatment. How to understand or approach these 'refractory', 'TRD' or 'difficult to treat' patients need to be revisited. Treatment resistant depression (TRD) has been described elsewhere as failure to respond to adequate treatment by two different antidepressants. This definition is problematic as it suggests that TRD is a subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD), inferring a boundary between TRD and depression that is not treatment resistant. However, there is scant evidence to suggest that a discrete TRD entity exists as a distinct subtype of MDD, which itself is not a discrete or homogeneous entity. Similarly, the boundary between TRD and other forms of depression is predicated at least in part on regulatory and research requirements rather than biological evidence or clinical utility. AIM: This paper aims to investigate the notion of treatment failure in order to understand (i) what is TRD in the context of a broader formulation based on the understanding of depression, (ii) what factors make an individual patient difficult to treat, and (iii) what is the appropriate and individualised treatment strategy, predicated on an individual with refractory forms of depression? METHOD: Expert contributors to this paper were sought internationally by contacting representatives of key professional societies in the treatment of MDD - World Federation of Societies for Biological Psychiatry, Australasian Society for Bipolar and Depressive Disorders, International Society for Affective Disorders, Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologium and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments. The manuscript was prepared through iterative editing. OUTCOMES: The concept of TRD as a discrete subtype of MDD, defined by failure to respond to pharmacotherapy, is not supported by evidence. Between 15 and 30% of depressive episodes fail to respond to adequate trials of 2 antidepressants, and 68% of individuals do not achieve remission from depression after a first-line course of antidepressant treatment. Failure to respond to antidepressant treatment, somatic therapies or psychotherapies may often reflect other factors including; biological resistance, diagnostic error, limitations of current therapies, psychosocial variables, a past history of exposure to childhood maltreatment or abuse, job satisfaction, personality disorders, co-morbid mental and physical disorders, substance use or non-adherence to treatment. Only a subset of patients not responding to antidepressant treatment can be explained through pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamics mechanisms. We propose that non remitting MDD should be personalised, and propose a strategy of 'deconstructing depression'. By this approach, the clinician considers which factors contribute to making this individual both depressed and 'resistant' to previous therapeutic approaches. Clinical formulation is required to understand the nature of the depression. Many predictors of response are not biological, and reflect a confluence of biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors, which may influence the illness in a particular individual. After deconstructing depression at a personalised level, a personalised treatment plan can be constructed. The treatment plan needs to address the factors that have contributed to the individual's hard to treat depression. In addition, an individual with a history of illness may have a lot of accumulated life issues due to consequences of their illness, and these should be addressed in a recovery plan. LIMITATIONS: A 'deconstructing depression' qualitative rubric does not easily provide clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for researchers wanting to investigate TRD. CONCLUSIONS: MDD is a polymorphic disorder and many individuals who fail to respond to standard pharmacotherapy and are considered hard to treat. These patients are best served by personalised approaches that deconstruct the factors that have contributed to the patient's depression and implementing a treatment plan that adequately addresses these factors. The existence of TRD as a discrete and distinct subtype of MDD, defined by two treatment failures, is not supported by evidence.
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder is a common, recurrent, disabling and costly disorder that is often severe and/or chronic, and for which non-remission on guideline concordant first-line antidepressant treatment is the norm. A sizeable percentage of patients diagnosed with MDD do not achieve full remission after receiving antidepressant treatment. How to understand or approach these 'refractory', 'TRD' or 'difficult to treat' patients need to be revisited. Treatment resistant depression (TRD) has been described elsewhere as failure to respond to adequate treatment by two different antidepressants. This definition is problematic as it suggests that TRD is a subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD), inferring a boundary between TRD and depression that is not treatment resistant. However, there is scant evidence to suggest that a discrete TRD entity exists as a distinct subtype of MDD, which itself is not a discrete or homogeneous entity. Similarly, the boundary between TRD and other forms of depression is predicated at least in part on regulatory and research requirements rather than biological evidence or clinical utility. AIM: This paper aims to investigate the notion of treatment failure in order to understand (i) what is TRD in the context of a broader formulation based on the understanding of depression, (ii) what factors make an individual patient difficult to treat, and (iii) what is the appropriate and individualised treatment strategy, predicated on an individual with refractory forms of depression? METHOD: Expert contributors to this paper were sought internationally by contacting representatives of key professional societies in the treatment of MDD - World Federation of Societies for Biological Psychiatry, Australasian Society for Bipolar and Depressive Disorders, International Society for Affective Disorders, Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologium and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments. The manuscript was prepared through iterative editing. OUTCOMES: The concept of TRD as a discrete subtype of MDD, defined by failure to respond to pharmacotherapy, is not supported by evidence. Between 15 and 30% of depressive episodes fail to respond to adequate trials of 2 antidepressants, and 68% of individuals do not achieve remission from depression after a first-line course of antidepressant treatment. Failure to respond to antidepressant treatment, somatic therapies or psychotherapies may often reflect other factors including; biological resistance, diagnostic error, limitations of current therapies, psychosocial variables, a past history of exposure to childhood maltreatment or abuse, job satisfaction, personality disorders, co-morbid mental and physical disorders, substance use or non-adherence to treatment. Only a subset of patients not responding to antidepressant treatment can be explained through pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamics mechanisms. We propose that non remitting MDD should be personalised, and propose a strategy of 'deconstructing depression'. By this approach, the clinician considers which factors contribute to making this individual both depressed and 'resistant' to previous therapeutic approaches. Clinical formulation is required to understand the nature of the depression. Many predictors of response are not biological, and reflect a confluence of biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors, which may influence the illness in a particular individual. After deconstructing depression at a personalised level, a personalised treatment plan can be constructed. The treatment plan needs to address the factors that have contributed to the individual's hard to treat depression. In addition, an individual with a history of illness may have a lot of accumulated life issues due to consequences of their illness, and these should be addressed in a recovery plan. LIMITATIONS: A 'deconstructing depression' qualitative rubric does not easily provide clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for researchers wanting to investigate TRD. CONCLUSIONS:MDD is a polymorphic disorder and many individuals who fail to respond to standard pharmacotherapy and are considered hard to treat. These patients are best served by personalised approaches that deconstruct the factors that have contributed to the patient's depression and implementing a treatment plan that adequately addresses these factors. The existence of TRD as a discrete and distinct subtype of MDD, defined by two treatment failures, is not supported by evidence.
Authors: Susan Ling; Felicia Ceban; Leanna M W Lui; Yena Lee; Kayla M Teopiz; Nelson B Rodrigues; Orly Lipsitz; Hartej Gill; Mehala Subramaniapillai; Rodrigo B Mansur; Kangguang Lin; Roger Ho; Joshua D Rosenblat; David Castle; Roger S McIntyre Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Ralph Kupka; Anne Duffy; Jan Scott; Jorge Almeida; Vicent Balanzá-Martínez; Boris Birmaher; David J Bond; Elisa Brietzke; Ines Chendo; Benicio N Frey; Iria Grande; Danella Hafeman; Tomas Hajek; Manon Hillegers; Marcia Kauer-Sant'Anna; Rodrigo B Mansur; Afra van der Markt; Robert Post; Mauricio Tohen; Hailey Tremain; Gustavo Vazquez; Eduard Vieta; Lakshmi N Yatham; Michael Berk; Martin Alda; Flávio Kapczinski Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 5.345