Literature DB >> 33289162

Hierarchical, rotation-equivariant neural networks to select structural models of protein complexes.

Stephan Eismann1,2, Raphael J L Townshend2, Nathaniel Thomas3, Milind Jagota2,4, Bowen Jing2, Ron O Dror2,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Predicting the structure of multi-protein complexes is a grand challenge in biochemistry, with major implications for basic science and drug discovery. Computational structure prediction methods generally leverage predefined structural features to distinguish accurate structural models from less accurate ones. This raises the question of whether it is possible to learn characteristics of accurate models directly from atomic coordinates of protein complexes, with no prior assumptions. Here we introduce a machine learning method that learns directly from the 3D positions of all atoms to identify accurate models of protein complexes, without using any precomputed physics-inspired or statistical terms. Our neural network architecture combines multiple ingredients that together enable end-to-end learning from molecular structures containing tens of thousands of atoms: a point-based representation of atoms, equivariance with respect to rotation and translation, local convolutions, and hierarchical subsampling operations. When used in combination with previously developed scoring functions, our network substantially improves the identification of accurate structural models among a large set of possible models. Our network can also be used to predict the accuracy of a given structural model in absolute terms. The architecture we present is readily applicable to other tasks involving learning on 3D structures of large atomic systems.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords:  equivariant neural network; physics-aware machine learning; protein docking; representation learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 33289162     DOI: 10.1002/prot.26033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  6 in total

1.  Improved cluster ranking in protein-protein docking using a regression approach.

Authors:  Shahabeddin Sotudian; Israel T Desta; Nasser Hashemi; Shahrooz Zarbafian; Dima Kozakov; Pirooz Vakili; Sandor Vajda; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 7.271

2.  Leveraging nonstructural data to predict structures and affinities of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Joseph M Paggi; Julia A Belk; Scott A Hollingsworth; Nicolas Villanueva; Alexander S Powers; Mary J Clark; Augustine G Chemparathy; Jonathan E Tynan; Thomas K Lau; Roger K Sunahara; Ron O Dror
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DeepRank: a deep learning framework for data mining 3D protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Nicolas Renaud; Cunliang Geng; Sonja Georgievska; Francesco Ambrosetti; Lars Ridder; Dario F Marzella; Manon F Réau; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Li C Xue
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Protein Design with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Marianne Defresne; Sophie Barbe; Thomas Schiex
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Researchers turn to deep learning to decode protein structures.

Authors:  Stephen Ornes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Deep Local Analysis evaluates protein docking conformations with locally oriented cubes.

Authors:  Yasser Mohseni Behbahani; Simon Crouzet; Elodie Laine; Alessandra Carbone
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 6.931

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.