Literature DB >> 33288737

Genetic alterations in gastric cancer patients according to sex.

Li-Wen Hsu1,2, Kuo-Hung Huang1,2, Ming-Huang Chen2,3, Wen-Liang Fang1,2, Yee Chao2,3, Su-Shun Lo2,4, Anna Fen-Yau Li2,5, Chew-Wun Wu1,2, Yi-Ming Shyr1,2.   

Abstract

To date, few reports have investigated the genetic alterations and clinicopathological features in gastric cancer (GC) according to sex. In total, 2673 GC patients receiving curative surgery were enrolled. Among the 2673 GC patients, 1979 (74.0%) patients were male. After propensity-score matching, 846 patients were enrolled for the analysis, including 423 males and 423 females. There was no significant difference in the clinicopathological features between the sexes. Regarding the initial recurrence pattern, the males were more likely to develop tumor recurrence and liver metastasis than the females, especially in stage III GC. Regarding the molecular analysis, the males had higher PD-L1 expression than the females, especially in stage III GC. In addition, the patients aged ≥ 65 years had higher PD-L1 expression than the patients younger than 65 years. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that sex was among the independent prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Among the patients with liver metastases, PD-L1 expression was more common among the aged male patients. The males were associated with more tumor recurrence and higher PD-L1 expression than the females, especially in stage III GC. For GC patients with liver metastases, PD-L1 testing is recommended, especially among aged male patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinicopathological feature; gastric cancer; genetic alteration; prognosis; sex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33288737      PMCID: PMC7835020          DOI: 10.18632/aging.202142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


  35 in total

Review 1.  Nanoparticle systems for cancer vaccine.

Authors:  Ru Wen; Afoma C Umeano; Yi Kou; Jian Xu; Ammad Ahmad Farooqi
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Influence of gender and menopause on gastric emptying and motility.

Authors:  W R Hutson; R L Roehrkasse; A Wald
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Delayed gastric emptying and decreased antral contractility in normal premenopausal women compared with men.

Authors:  L C Knight; H P Parkman; K L Brown; M A Miller; D M Trate; A H Maurer; R S Fisher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Nationwide standardisation and evaluation of scintigraphic gastric emptying: reference values and comparisons between subgroups in a multicentre trial.

Authors:  P Grybäck; G Hermansson; E Lyrenäs; K W Beckman; H Jacobsson; P M Hellström
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-06

5.  Clinicopathologic and genetic characteristics of gastric cancer in young male and female patients.

Authors:  Shogo Sasao; Toru Hiyama; Shinji Tanaka; Masaharu Yoshihara; Wataru Yasui; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Incidence and factors associated with recurrence patterns after intended curative surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chew-Wun Wu; Su-Shun Lo; King-Han Shen; Mao-Chih Hsieh; Jen-Hao Chen; Jen-Huey Chiang; Hwai-Jeng Lin; Anna F-Y Li; Wing-Yiu Lui
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 10 studies with 1,901 patients.

Authors:  Minghui Zhang; Yuandi Dong; Haitao Liu; Yan Wang; Shu Zhao; Qijia Xuan; Yan Wang; Qingyuan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Male predominance of upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma cannot be explained by differences in tobacco smoking in men versus women.

Authors:  N D Freedman; M H Derakhshan; C C Abnet; A Schatzkin; A R Hollenbeck; K E L McColl
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  SOX9 indirectly regulates CEACAM1 expression and immune resistance in melanoma cells.

Authors:  Shira Ashkenazi; Rona Ortenberg; Michal Besser; Jacob Schachter; Gal Markel
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  Sex-based differences in histology, staging, and prognosis among 2983 gastric cancer surgery patients.

Authors:  Yonghoon Choi; Nayoung Kim; Ki Wook Kim; Hyeong Ho Jo; Jaehyung Park; Hyuk Yoon; Cheol Min Shin; Young Soo Park; Dong Ho Lee; Hyeon Jeong Oh; Hye Seung Lee; Young Suk Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Yun-Suhk Suh; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Ji-Won Kim; Jin Won Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Won Chang; Ji Hoon Park; Yoon Jin Lee; Kyoung Ho Lee; Young Hoon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  CACNA1C is a prognostic predictor for patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Xiaohan Chang; Yunxia Dong
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.234

3.  Nucleolar protein NOP2 could serve as a potential prognostic predictor for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Fangfang Qu; Shouyong Liu; Jincai Zhou; Yi Wang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.