| Literature DB >> 33288701 |
Xinbo Yuan1,2,3, Ping Xu2, Yongdong Yu1,2,3, Yan Xiong4.
Abstract
The plant growth hormone auxin controls cell identity, cell division, and expansion. In the primary root of Arabidopsis there is a robust auxin gradient with a peak concentration at the tip of the meristem and a significant decrease throughout the elongation zone. The molecular mechanisms of how such a steep auxin gradient is established and maintained, and how this auxin gradient within the root dynamically adjusts in response to environmental stimuli are still largely unknown. Here, using a large-scale Arabidopsis mutant screening, we described the identification of PIN2 (PIN-FORMED 2), an auxin efflux facilitator, as a key downstream regulator in glucose-TOR (target of rapamycin) energy signaling. We demonstrate that glucose-activated TOR phosphorylates and stabilizes PIN2 and therefore influences the gradient distribution of PIN2 in the Arabidopsis primary root. Interestingly, dysregulation of TOR or PIN2 disrupts the glucose-promoted low auxin region located in the elongation zone that is essential for cell elongation. Taken together, our results shed light on how carbon and metabolic status can be tightly integrated with the hormone-driven processes to orchestrate complex plant growth programs.Entities:
Keywords: PIN2; auxin; glucose; root; target of rapamycin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33288701 PMCID: PMC7768691 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015400117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 12.779
Fig. 1.PIN2 is a key downstream regulator in glucose-TOR signaling. (A) Images of representative seedlings in WT (Col-0), eir1-1, and SALK_122916c lines with or without glucose (Glc) and Torin2 (T) treatment. (Scale bar, 5 mm.) (B) Relative ratio of root length of A. Means ± SE, unpaired two-tailed t test, ***P < 0.001. (C) EdU staining of root meristem in WT (Col-0) and eir1-1 with or without 2 h glucose (Glc) and Torin2 (T) treatment. (Scale bar, 50 μm.) (D) Quantification of relative EdU intensity in C. (E) Cell length in differentiation zone of Col-0 and eir1-1 with or without glucose (Glc) and Torin2 (T) treatment. Images shown are part of the 10th to 16th epidermal cells after onset of cell elongation. (Scale bar, 50 μm.) D, differentiation; E, elongation; M, meristem. Red and yellow asterisks indicate the bottom and upper boundary of a cell, respectively. (F) Relative ratio of root cell length in E. Means ± SE, unpaired two-tailed t test, ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 2.Glucose-TOR modulates auxin and PIN2 distribution regions in root. (A) Expression patterns of DR5v2::ntdTomato in Col-0 and eir1-1 with or without glucose (Glc) and Torin2 (T) treatment. Yellow arrowheads indicate the upper edge of the meristem; white arrowheads indicate the boundary of low auxin region. Maximal projections of z-stacks are presented. (Scale bars, 50 μm.) Each whole root image was assembled by two overlapped confocal images. (B) Quantification of auxin-response regions in A. High auxin region (meristem zone, below the yellow arrowheads), low auxin region (between the yellow and white arrowheads), and moderate auxin region (above the white arrowheads). Means ± SE; n ≥ 8; the letters beside the bars indicate significant different length of low auxin region under different treatments; unpaired two-tailed t test, P < 0.05. The numbers inside the bars indicate the fluorescence intensity of each region. (C) Expression patterns of pPIN2::PIN2-GFP in Col-0 and tor-es with or without glucose (Glc) and Torin2 (T) treatment. The yellow arrowheads indicate the upper edge of the meristem and the white arrowheads indicate the boundary where the expression of PIN2 disappears. Maximal projections of z-stacks are presented. (Scale bar, 50 μm.) Each whole root image was assembled by three to four overlapped confocal images. (D) Quantification of PIN2 expression regions in C. Meristem zone (below the yellow arrowheads), PIN2-declining region (between the yellow and white arrowheads), and no PIN2 region (above the white arrowheads). Means ± SE; n ≥ 8; the letters beside the bars indicate significant different lengths of PIN2-declining region under different treatments, unpaired two-tailed t test, P < 0.05. The numbers inside the bars indicate the fluorescence intensity of each region. (E) The PIN2 expression level under glucose starvation or TOR inhibition conditions. Total RNA was isolated from primary root, and analyzed by qRT-PCR. Means ± SE; n = 3; n.s., no significant difference. (F) TOR inhibition triggers a faster PIN2 degradation. The 4-d-old pPIN2::PIN2-GFP seedlings grown in the presence of a glucose supply were treated with or without Torin2 (T) and CHX for 3 h. Images shown are cells from the elongation zone. (Scale bar, 50 μm.) (G) Quantification of relative fluorescence intensity in F. Means ± SE; n ≥ 8, unpaired two-tailed t test, ***P < 0.001. (H) TOR interacts with PIN2-HL, revealed by semi-in vitro pull-down assay. HL, hydrophilic loop (amino acids 188 to 477). (I) TOR phosphorylates PIN2-HL, revealed by the in vitro kinase assay.