Robert Toto1, Jeffrey Petersen2, Jeffrey S Berns3, Eldrin Foster Lewis4, Qui Tran2, Matthew R Weir5. 1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas Robert.toto@utsouthwestern.edu. 2. Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California. 3. Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California. 5. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to high doses or a high cumulative dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may contribute to cardiovascular events in patients with CKD and anemia. Whether using a low fixed ESA dose versus dosing based on a hemoglobin-based, titration-dose algorithm in such patients might reduce risks associated with high ESA doses and decrease the cumulative exposure-while reducing the need for red blood cell transfusions-is unknown. METHODS: In this phase-3, randomized trial involving 756 adults with stage-3 to -5 CKD and anemia, we evaluated incidence of red blood cell transfusions for participants randomized to receive darbepoetin given as a fixed dose (0.45 µg/kg every 4 weeks) versus administered according to a hemoglobin-based, titration-dose algorithm, for up to 2 years. Participants received transfusions as deemed necessary by the treating physician. RESULTS: There were 379 patients randomized to the fixed-dose group, and 377 to the titration-dose group. The percentage of participants transfused did not differ (24.1% and 24.4% for the fixed-dose and titration-dose group, respectively), with similar time to first transfusion. The titration-dose group achieved significantly higher median hemoglobin (9.9 g/dl) compared with the fixed-dose group (9.4 g/dl). The fixed-dose group had a significantly lower median cumulative dose of darbepoetin (median monthly dose of 30.9 µg) compared with the titration-dose group (53.6 µg median monthly dose). The FD and TD group received a median (Q1, Q3) cumulative dose per 4 weeks of darbepoetin of 30.9 (21.8, 40.0) µg and 53.6 (31.1, 89.9) µg, respectively; the median of the difference between treatment groups was -22.1 (95% CI, -26.1 to -18.1) µg. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate no evidence of difference in incidence of red blood cell transfusion for a titration-dose strategy versus a fixed-dose strategy for darbepoetin. This suggests that a low fixed dose of darbepoetin may be used as an alternative to a dose-titration approach to minimize transfusions, with less cumulative dosing.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to high doses or a high cumulative dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may contribute to cardiovascular events in patients with CKD and anemia. Whether using a low fixed ESA dose versus dosing based on a hemoglobin-based, titration-dose algorithm in such patients might reduce risks associated with high ESA doses and decrease the cumulative exposure-while reducing the need for red blood cell transfusions-is unknown. METHODS: In this phase-3, randomized trial involving 756 adults with stage-3 to -5 CKD and anemia, we evaluated incidence of red blood cell transfusions for participants randomized to receive darbepoetin given as a fixed dose (0.45 µg/kg every 4 weeks) versus administered according to a hemoglobin-based, titration-dose algorithm, for up to 2 years. Participants received transfusions as deemed necessary by the treating physician. RESULTS: There were 379 patients randomized to the fixed-dose group, and 377 to the titration-dose group. The percentage of participants transfused did not differ (24.1% and 24.4% for the fixed-dose and titration-dose group, respectively), with similar time to first transfusion. The titration-dose group achieved significantly higher median hemoglobin (9.9 g/dl) compared with the fixed-dose group (9.4 g/dl). The fixed-dose group had a significantly lower median cumulative dose of darbepoetin (median monthly dose of 30.9 µg) compared with the titration-dose group (53.6 µg median monthly dose). The FD and TD group received a median (Q1, Q3) cumulative dose per 4 weeks of darbepoetin of 30.9 (21.8, 40.0) µg and 53.6 (31.1, 89.9) µg, respectively; the median of the difference between treatment groups was -22.1 (95% CI, -26.1 to -18.1) µg. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate no evidence of difference in incidence of red blood cell transfusion for a titration-dose strategy versus a fixed-dose strategy for darbepoetin. This suggests that a low fixed dose of darbepoetin may be used as an alternative to a dose-titration approach to minimize transfusions, with less cumulative dosing.
Authors: Glenn M Chertow; Jiannong Liu; Keri L Monda; David T Gilbertson; M Alan Brookhart; Anne C Beaubrun; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Allan Pollock; Charles A Herzog; Akhtar Ashfaq; Til Sturmer; Kenneth J Rothman; Brian D Bradbury; Allan J Collins Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Susan L Stramer; F Blaine Hollinger; Louis M Katz; Steven Kleinman; Peyton S Metzel; Kay R Gregory; Roger Y Dodd Journal: Transfusion Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Richard A Hirth; Marc N Turenne; Adam S Wilk; John R C Wheeler; Kathryn K Sleeman; Wei Zhang; Matthew A Paul; Tammie A Nahra; Joseph M Messana Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Julie M Yabu; Matthew W Anderson; Deborah Kim; Brian D Bradbury; Calvin D Lou; Jeffrey Petersen; Jerome Rossert; Glenn M Chertow; Dolly B Tyan Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: W W Pfaff; R J Howard; J C Scornik; C Day; J Renderer; J Scott; R S Fennel; J C Peterson; D R Salomon; P R Patton Journal: Transplantation Date: 1989-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mary S Leffell; Deborah Kim; Renato M Vega; Andrea A Zachary; Jeffrey Petersen; John M Hart; Jerome Rossert; Brian D Bradbury Journal: Transplantation Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 4.939