Lindsay Till Hoyt1, Alison K Cohen2, Brandon Dull3, Elena Maker Castro4, Neshat Yazdani3. 1. Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, New York. Electronic address: lhoyt1@fordham.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 3. Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, New York. 4. Department of Psychology and Human Development, School of Education & Information Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to document young adults' perceived stress and anxiety in a diverse sample of college students across the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We recruited, via Instagram, a sample of full-time college students aged 18-22 from across the U.S. We surveyed them in April (baseline; N = 707; mean age = 20.0, SD = 1.3) and July (follow-up) 2020. This study presents overall levels of perceived stress and general anxiety symptoms and inequalities across each of these outcomes by gender, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and household income. We also explore potential explanations for these health issues by analyzing baseline qualitative data. RESULTS: All students, on average, were suffering from perceived stress and anxiety, with especially high levels in April. We also identified inequalities in college student mental well-being, particularly by gender identity and sexual orientation. Women reported worse well-being compared with men; transgender and gender diverse and sexual minority youths reported worse outcomes than their cisgender, heterosexual peers at both time points. Qualitative data illustrate how the COVID-19 pandemic has generated educational, economic, and environmental stressors that are affecting college students' well-being. CONCLUSIONS: As colleges and universities think about how to manage and mitigate the infectious disease dimensions of COVID-19 among their student populations, they must also consider who is most at risk for increased stress and anxiety during the pandemic.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to document young adults' perceived stress and anxiety in a diverse sample of college students across the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We recruited, via Instagram, a sample of full-time college students aged 18-22 from across the U.S. We surveyed them in April (baseline; N = 707; mean age = 20.0, SD = 1.3) and July (follow-up) 2020. This study presents overall levels of perceived stress and general anxiety symptoms and inequalities across each of these outcomes by gender, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and household income. We also explore potential explanations for these health issues by analyzing baseline qualitative data. RESULTS: All students, on average, were suffering from perceived stress and anxiety, with especially high levels in April. We also identified inequalities in college student mental well-being, particularly by gender identity and sexual orientation. Women reported worse well-being compared with men; transgender and gender diverse and sexual minority youths reported worse outcomes than their cisgender, heterosexual peers at both time points. Qualitative data illustrate how the COVID-19 pandemic has generated educational, economic, and environmental stressors that are affecting college students' well-being. CONCLUSIONS: As colleges and universities think about how to manage and mitigate the infectious disease dimensions of COVID-19 among their student populations, they must also consider who is most at risk for increased stress and anxiety during the pandemic.
Authors: Mariah D Ehmke; Bhagyashree Katare; Kristin Kiesel; Jason S Bergtold; Jerrod M Penn; Kathryn A Boys Journal: Appl Econ Perspect Policy Date: 2022-02-05 Impact factor: 4.890
Authors: Laura Giessing; Julia Kannen; Jana Strahler; Marie Ottilie Frenkel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Dariusz Juchnowicz; Jacek Baj; Alicja Forma; Kaja Karakuła; Ryszard Sitarz; Jacek Bogucki; Hanna Karakula-Juchnowicz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.241