Anna E Epperson1, Thomas E Novotny2, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher3. 1. Psychological Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, California. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. 3. Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: bonnieh@stanford.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Examine adolescents' and young adults' (AYAs) knowledge and perceptions about the composition and environmental harms of cigarette filters and determine how perceptions are associated with support for policy interventions. METHODS: Cross-sectional, convenience sample from 10 California schools. AYAs (N = 429; 70% < 21 years) were surveyed about tobacco use, perceptions of cigarette filters, their impact on the environment, and cigarette sales bans. RESULTS: Most agreed that filters are harmful to the environment and not biodegradable (89%, n = 383 respectively); fewer knew filters are made of plastic (43%, n = 185). AYAs who agreed that filters are harmful to the environment were more supportive of cigarette sales bans (OR = 2.78 [95% CI: 1.18, 6.58]). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the environmental harms of cigarettes among AYAs may strengthen support for tobacco control. More research is needed to further understand the knowledge and attitudes about the environmental impact of tobacco and to clarify how this might add support for tobacco-related policies.
PURPOSE: Examine adolescents' and young adults' (AYAs) knowledge and perceptions about the composition and environmental harms of cigarette filters and determine how perceptions are associated with support for policy interventions. METHODS: Cross-sectional, convenience sample from 10 California schools. AYAs (N = 429; 70% < 21 years) were surveyed about tobacco use, perceptions of cigarette filters, their impact on the environment, and cigarette sales bans. RESULTS: Most agreed that filters are harmful to the environment and not biodegradable (89%, n = 383 respectively); fewer knew filters are made of plastic (43%, n = 185). AYAs who agreed that filters are harmful to the environment were more supportive of cigarette sales bans (OR = 2.78 [95% CI: 1.18, 6.58]). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the environmental harms of cigarettes among AYAs may strengthen support for tobacco control. More research is needed to further understand the knowledge and attitudes about the environmental impact of tobacco and to clarify how this might add support for tobacco-related policies.
Authors: Jessica M Rath; Rebecca A Rubenstein; Laurel E Curry; Sarah E Shank; Julia C Cartwright Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Elli Slaughter; Richard M Gersberg; Kayo Watanabe; John Rudolph; Chris Stransky; Thomas E Novotny Journal: Tob Control Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; K Michael Cummings; David Hammond; James F Thrasher; Cindy Tworek Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Paula Stigler-Granados; Lawrence Fulton; Evangelina Nunez Patlan; Mischa Terzyk; Thomas E Novotny Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390