Literature DB >> 33288296

Distinct microplastic distributions in soils of different land-use types: A case study of Chinese farmlands.

Jiao Wang1, Jiayao Li1, Sitong Liu1, Hongyu Li1, Xiaochen Chen2, Chu Peng3, Pingping Zhang4, Xianhua Liu5.   

Abstract

Microplastic (MP) pollution poses a huge threat to agroecosystems, but the distribution characteristics of MPs in different types of farmland are still largely unknown. In this work, samples from six land-use types were collected from Chinese farmlands in five provinces. It was found that MP abundances were in the range of 2783-6366 items/kg in all samples. MP distribution results showed that over 80% of particles were less than 1 mm, and that MP sizes ranging between 0.02 and 0.2 mm represented the greatest proportion. The particle shape classified as fragment (with edges and angular) was the most frequent shape, with an abundance of approximately 54.05%. Polyethylene (PE) and polyamides (PA) were the most abundant polymers in cropped lands; 20.88% and 20.31%, respectively. Statistical analyses showed that lands used for plastic mulching (mulch film and greenhouse crops) had a significantly higher particle abundance, hence identifying plastic mulching as a major contributor to MP pollution in agricultural lands. Furthermore, paddy lands had a significantly higher MP abundance than wheat lands. Variation analyses of MP characteristics revealed that cereal crop farmlands (wheat, paddy land) were more likely to contain fibrous shapes and large MP particles (1-5 mm). Economically important tree lands (orchards, woodlands) were likely to contain fragment shapes and pony-size MPs (0.02-0.2 mm). Discrepancies among farmlands may depend on various reasons, such as mulching plastic application, irrigation, atmospheric fallout, etc. This study provides firsthand evidences about the characteristics of MP pollution in farmlands and explores some predominant MP sources in agroecosystems.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cereal crops; Economically important trees; Farmlands; Microplastics; Mulching lands

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33288296     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  3 in total

Review 1.  Interactions Between Microplastics and Heavy Metals in Aquatic Environments: A Review.

Authors:  Sitong Liu; Jiafu Shi; Jiao Wang; Yexin Dai; Hongyu Li; Jiayao Li; Xianhua Liu; Xiaochen Chen; Zhiyun Wang; Pingping Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 2.  Impacts of Micro- and Nanoplastics on Photosynthesis Activities of Photoautotrophs: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Yunxue Li; Xianhua Liu; Shrameeta Shinde; Jiao Wang; Pingping Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Differences, links, and roles of microbial and stoichiometric factors in microplastic distribution: A case study of five typical rice cropping regions in China.

Authors:  Yao Yao; Lili Wang; Lingxuan Gong; Gang Li; Weiming Xiu; Xiaomei Yang; Bingchang Tan; Jianning Zhao; Guilong Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 6.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.