| Literature DB >> 33287757 |
Yue Wu1,2, Lulu Huang1,2, Yixin Liu1,2, Li Xu1,2, Wenyi Guo3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the choroidal changes in Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) secondary glaucoma and non-glaucoma port-wine stain (PWS) patients by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT).Entities:
Keywords: Choroidal Hemangiomas; Complications; Glaucoma; Optical coherence tomography; Port-wine stain; Sturge-weber syndrome
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33287757 PMCID: PMC7720598 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01744-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1Color fundus photograph (a, b) and enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) (c, d) of a Sturge-Weber syndrome secondary glaucoma patient shows the choroidal hemangioma criteria of the study. The color fundus photograph (b) shows a “ketchup” change in the left eye. EDI-OCT (d) of the left eye shows an elevation of the retina/choroid complex with a low-to-medium reflective signal from the lesion
Baseline Demographic and Clinical Data
| NGPWS (case no. = 46) | SG (case no. = 35) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Female | 21 | 16 |
| Male | 25 | 19b |
| Age (yrs.), mean ± SD | 16.52 ± 13.63 | 13.94 ± 8.27c |
| Location of the facial PWS | ||
| Unilateral PWS | 44 | 32b |
| Bilateral PWS | 2 | 3 |
| Glaucomatous eyes | 0 | 38 |
| IOP (mmHg), mean ± SD | ||
| Ipsilateral eyesa | 15.58 ± 3.57c | 24.58 ± 8.56d |
| Contralateral eyesa | 14.45 ± 3.43 | 15.13 ± 3.79 |
| C/D, median (IQR) | ||
| Ipsilateral eyes | 0.30 (0.30, 0.40)e | 0.73 (0.64, 0.81)f |
| Contralateral eyes | 0.30 (0.30, 0.36) | 0.30 (0.30, 0.40) |
| Simple excessive thickening of choroid eyes | ||
| Ipsilateral eyes | 2 | 5 |
| Contralateral eyes | 0 | 0 |
| Choroidal hemangioma eyes | 0 | 21g |
| Choroidal thickness (μm), mean ± SD | ||
| Ipsilateral eyes | 358.10 ± 117.40h (45 eyes) | 511.40 ± 242.10h, i(15 eyes) |
| Contralateral eyes | 288.20 ± 79.04 (41 eyes) | 283.90 ± 92.27c (29 eyes) |
IOP Intraocular pressure, C/D Cup-to-disc ratio, IQR Interquartile range, shown as (25, 75%)
a. Ipsilateral eyes were the eyes in same side of the facial hemangiectasis while the contralateral eyes were in non-PWS side
b. p>0.05, χ2 test
c. p>0.05, unpaired t test
d. p<0.0001, unpaired t test
e. p>0.05, Mann-Whitney test
f. p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney test
g. p<0.0001, Fisher’s Exact Test
h. p<0.05, compared with the contralateral eyes using unpaired t test
i. p<0.05, compared with the ipsilateral eyes of NGPWS patients using unpaired t test
Fig. 2Color fundus photograph (a, b) and enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) (c, d) of a Sturge-Weber syndrome secondary glaucoma patient shows excessive thickening of the choroid without choroidal hemangiomas. The color fundus photograph (a) shows no color changes compared to the fellow eye. EDI-OCT (d) shows no elevation of the retina/choroid complex but with a low-to-medium reflective signal from the lesion
Fig. 3Type B ultrasound (a) shows retinal and choroidal detachment 1 week after Ex-PRESS implantation in an 8-year-old Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) secondary glaucoma patient. B-scan ultrasound (b) shows retinal and choroid recovery after 3 months of topical glucocorticoid and atropine administration. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) (c, d) shows two eyes with mild retinal detachment (green arrow) in a 3-year-old bilateral SWS-induced glaucoma patient 1 week after trabeculotomy. The EDI-OCT scan quality is low due to the patient’s young age
Relationship between Choroidal Hemangioma to Post-operational Posterior Segment Complications in SWS Induced Glaucoma Eyes
| Choroidal Hemangioma Eyes | Non-choroidal Hemangioma Eyes | |
|---|---|---|
| Count of Eyes | 21 | 17 |
| Underwent anti-glaucoma surgery (eyes) | 13 | 7 |
| Post-operational posterior segment complications (eyes)a | ||
| Choroidal and Retinal Detachment | 4 | 0 |
| Retinal Detachment | 2 | 0 |
a. Existence of choroidal hemangioma is a risk factor of post-operational posterior segment complications (Odd Ratio = 2.000, 95% confidence interval, 1.136–3.522, p = 0.044)