Sudipta Patra1, Vandana Kalwaje Eshwara1, Aparna Ramakrishna Pai2, Muralidhar Varma3, Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay1,4. 1. Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. 2. Department of Neurology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. 4. Center for Emerging and Tropical Diseases, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Abstract
AIM: In this study, we aimed to discuss the clinical features, laboratory findings, treatment and outcome of seven cases of neurobrucellosis from a tertiary care center and review the available global literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The diagnosis of neurobrucellosis was established using the following criteria in our setting: (1) signs and symptoms of neurological infection with examination of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealing signs of meningitis, (2) isolation of Brucella spp. from blood and/or CSF and/or antibody titer ≥1:160 in serum using standard agglutination test (SAT) and/or the presence of anti-Brucella antibodies in CSF and/or detection of Brucella spp.-specific DNA from CSF using PCR. A literature search was performed to review previous cases of neurobrucellosis published worldwide during the last 30 years. RESULTS: The proportion of neurobrucellosis was 2.8% in our setting. Fever with headache and altered sensorium were the major presenting complaints. Brucella melitensis was isolated from blood culture in 6 patients. From the literature search, a total of 221 cases of neurobrucellosis were reviewed and analyzed. Meningitis (32.6%), loss of hearing (25.8%) and encephalitis (14.9%) were the most common clinical features. Involvement of cranial nerves, polyradiculopathy and paraplegia were the major complications found in patients with neurobrucellosis. CONCLUSIONS: Neurobrucellosis should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of befitting neurological, rheumatological, and neuropsychiatric presentations in endemic regions for brucellosis. To prevent morbidity and mortality associated with neurobrucellosis, a multimodal diagnostic approach is essential for early and accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.
AIM: In this study, we aimed to discuss the clinical features, laboratory findings, treatment and outcome of seven cases of neurobrucellosis from a tertiary care center and review the available global literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The diagnosis of neurobrucellosis was established using the following criteria in our setting: (1) signs and symptoms of neurological infection with examination of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealing signs of meningitis, (2) isolation of Brucella spp. from blood and/or CSF and/or antibody titer ≥1:160 in serum using standard agglutination test (SAT) and/or the presence of anti-Brucella antibodies in CSF and/or detection of Brucella spp.-specific DNA from CSF using PCR. A literature search was performed to review previous cases of neurobrucellosis published worldwide during the last 30 years. RESULTS: The proportion of neurobrucellosis was 2.8% in our setting. Fever with headache and altered sensorium were the major presenting complaints. Brucella melitensis was isolated from blood culture in 6 patients. From the literature search, a total of 221 cases of neurobrucellosis were reviewed and analyzed. Meningitis (32.6%), loss of hearing (25.8%) and encephalitis (14.9%) were the most common clinical features. Involvement of cranial nerves, polyradiculopathy and paraplegia were the major complications found in patients with neurobrucellosis. CONCLUSIONS: Neurobrucellosis should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of befitting neurological, rheumatological, and neuropsychiatric presentations in endemic regions for brucellosis. To prevent morbidity and mortality associated with neurobrucellosis, a multimodal diagnostic approach is essential for early and accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.