| Literature DB >> 33287209 |
Joanna Olczyk1, Jadwiga Sójka-Ledakowicz1, Anetta Walawska1, Anna Antecka2, Katarzyna Siwińska-Ciesielczyk3, Jakub Zdarta3, Teofil Jesionowski3.
Abstract
One of the directions of development in the textiles industry is the search for new technologies for producing modern multifunctional products. New solutions are sought to obtain materials that will protect humans against the harmful effects of the environment, including such factors as the activity of microorganisms and UV radiation. Products made of natural cellulose fibers are often used. In the case of this type of material, it is very important to perform appropriate pretreatment before subsequent technological processes. This treatment has the aim of removing impurities from the surface of the fibers, which results in the improvement of sorption properties and adhesion, leading directly to the better penetration of dyes and chemical modifiers into the structure of the materials. In this work, linen fabrics were subjected to a new, innovative treatment being a combination of bio-pretreatment using laccase from Cerrena unicolor and modification with CuO-SiO2 hybrid oxide microparticles by a dip-coating method. To compare the effect of alkaline or enzymatic pretreatment on the microstructure of the linen woven fabrics, SEM analysis was performed. The new textile products obtained after this combined process exhibit very good antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans, significant antibacterial activity against the Gram-negative Escherichia coli and the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus, as well as very good UV protection properties (ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) > 40). These innovative materials can be used especially for clothing or outdoor textiles for which resistance to microorganisms is required, as well as to protect people who are exposed to long-term, harmful effects of UV radiation.Entities:
Keywords: Cerrena unicolor; antimicrobial activity; barrier properties; cellulose fabrics; laccase; oxide hybrid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33287209 PMCID: PMC7729559 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25235701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Scanning electron micrographs of: (a,b) raw linen woven fabric, (c,d) linen woven fabric after alkaline treatment, (e,f) linen woven fabric after enzymatic treatment with 2.5 U/g of laccase, (g,h) linen woven fabric after enzymatic treatment with 5.0 U/g of laccase.
Figure 2Scanning electron micrographs of: (a,b) linen woven fabric after alkaline treatment and dip-coating with 5% wt. of CuO-SiO2, (c,d) linen woven fabric after enzymatic treatment with 2.5 U/g of laccase and dip-coating with 5% wt. of CuO-SiO2, (e,f) linen woven fabric after enzymatic treatment with 5.0 U/g of laccase and dip-coating with 5% wt. of CuO-SiO2.
Values of ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) and transmittance in the UVA (TUVA) and UVB (TUVB) range for linen woven fabrics after alkaline or enzymatic treatment and modification with inorganic hybrid.
| Sample Type | UPF | Transmittance (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw linen | 27 | TUVA = 4.52 TUVB = 3.9 |
| Linen/alkaline scouring | 39 | TUVA = 3.42 TUVB = 2.53 |
| Linen/2.5 U/g of laccase | 36 | TUVA = 3.83 TUVB = 2.89 |
| Linen/5.0 U/g of laccase | 36 | TUVA = 3.79 TUVB = 2.87 |
| Raw linen without pretreatment/5% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 32 | TUVA = 3.94 TUVB = 3.20 |
| Raw linen without pretreatment/7% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 29 | TUVA = 4.21 TUVB = 3.40 |
| Linen/alkaline scouring/5% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 64 (>50) | TUVA = 1.81 TUVB = 1.41 |
| Linen/alkaline scouring/7% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 72 (>50) | TUVA = 1.61 TUVB = 1.22 |
| Linen/2.5 U/g of laccase/5% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 131 (>50) | TUVA = 0.34 TUVB = 0.20 |
| Linen/5.0 U/g of laccase/5% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 110 (>50) | TUVA = 0.41 TUVB = 0.31 |
| Linen/2.5 U/g of laccase/7% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 128 (>50) | TUVA = 0.86 TUVB = 0.75 |
| Linen/5.0 U/g of laccase/7% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 99 (>50) | TUVA = 0.74 TUVB = 0.69 |
Figure 3Transmittance spectra (%T) in the range λ = 290–400 nm for: a. raw linen, b. linen woven fabric after dip-coating with 7% wt. of CuO-SiO2, c. linen woven fabric after alkaline scouring and dip-coating with 7% wt. of CuO-SiO2, d. linen woven fabric after enzymatic treatment with 2.5 U/g of laccase and dip-coating with 7% wt. of CuO-SiO2, e. linen woven fabric after enzymatic treatment with 2.5 U/g of laccase and dip-coating with 5% wt. of CuO-SiO2.
Microbiological activity of linen fabric samples modified by alkaline or enzymatic treatment and dip-coating with CuO-SiO2.
| Sample Type | Microbiological Activity against | Microbiological Activity against | Microbiological Activity against | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | L | A | L | A | L | |
| Raw linen | −0.2 | −5.0 | 0.0 | −4.1 | −1.4 | −3.8 |
| Linen/2.5 U/g of laccase/5% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 0.1 | >5.7 | >2.0 |
| Linen/2.5 U/g of laccase/7% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 6.3 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 0.2 | 5.5 | 1.8 |
| Linen/alkali-scouring/7% wt. of CuO-SiO2 | 6.3 | 1.2 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 5.3 | 1.6 |
A—microbiological activity coefficient, evaluation of antibacterial activity A < 0.5—None, 0.5 ≤ A < 2 —Weak, 2 ≤ A < 3—Significant, A ≥ 3—Strong; L—bactericidal activity value if L coefficient is not lower than 0 (see Section 3.8).