Literature DB >> 33286111

Design and Practical Stability of a New Class of Impulsive Fractional-Like Neural Networks.

Gani Stamov1, Ivanka Stamova2, Anatoliy Martynyuk3, Trayan Stamov4.   

Abstract

In this paper, a new class of impulsive neural networks with fractional-like derivatives is defined, and the practical stability properties of the solutions are investigated. The stability analysis exploits a new type of Lyapunov-like functions and their derivatives. Furthermore, the obtained results are applied to a bidirectional associative memory (BAM) neural network model with fractional-like derivatives. Some new results for the introduced neural network models with uncertain values of the parameters are also obtained.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fractional-like derivative; h−manifolds; impulses; neural networks; practical stability

Year:  2020        PMID: 33286111      PMCID: PMC7516808          DOI: 10.3390/e22030337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Entropy (Basel)        ISSN: 1099-4300            Impact factor:   2.524


1. Introduction

Cellular neural network systems [1,2] and their various generalizations have attracted the attention of the researchers due to their incredible opportunities for applications in areas such as pattern recognition, associative memory, classification, parallel computation, as well as, their ability to solve complex optimization problems. As such, neural network models have promising potential for applications in numerous engineering tasks [3,4], including engineering design tasks [5]. It is also observed that an efficient neural network’s training is related to entropy phenomena [6]. In addition, in many cases, entropy is used to measure the complexity in a neural network architecture [6,7]. On the other hand, since impulsive phenomena may affect the neural network behavior, some important and interesting results about different classes of impulsive neural networks have been obtained. See, for example [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], and the references therein. Recently, fractional calculus has become an emerging tool in numerous fields of science and technology. The concept of fractional derivatives generalizes the classical definitions of integer-order derivatives and integrals [16,17]. Due to the hereditary and memory characteristics of fractional derivatives, many real world processes and phenomena are better described by fractional-order models, such as system identification of thermal dynamics of buildings, entropy and information [18,19,20,21]. In addition, the dynamics, chaotic behavior, stability and synchronization of numerous fractional-order neural network models have been investigated in the recent literature [22,23,24,25], including the behavior of fractional impulsive neural networks [26,27,28,29,30]. Besides the most applicable Riemann-Liouville and Caputo types of fractional derivatives, many new types of fractional derivatives were introduced by the researchers. See, for example [31,32,33,34,35], and the references therein. Despite the great opportunities for applications in modeling of real-world processes, the use of all these derivatives leads to computational complexities. For example, the Riemann–Liouville and Caputo derivatives do not obey the Leibniz rule and chain rule. To overcome these difficulties, new concepts has been proposed in [36,37,38,39,40]. Furthermore, important notes about some of the new concepts are given, for example, in [41,42,43,44,45] and the references therein. In our early paper [46], we introduced the notion of "fractional-like derivative“ (FLD) which offers some computational simplifications related to FLDs of compositions of functions. Since then, the interest of the researchers to the theory of equations with FLDs has begun. Some basic results on the fundamental and qualitative theory of such equations has been established very recently. See, for example [47,48,49,50] and some of the references therein. However, the theory of impulsive equations with FLDs is still in a very initial stage. The first results on impulsive equations with conformable derivatives and FLDs have been derived in [51,52,53], where some generalizations of FLDs and integrals have been introduced. Due to the computational convenience that offer generalized FLDs, the theory of such equations needs more developments. Furthermore, the theory of impulsive systems with generalized FLDs has not been applied to real-world models of diverse interest. The first aim of the present research is to introduce a design of impulsive fractional-like neural network models. The second contribution of our paper is to present efficient stability conditions to the model under consideration. To this end, we investigate its practical stability behavior with respect to manifolds. It is well known that the stability properties of a neural network are essential for its performance. Furthermore, in numerous cases the model can be unstable in the classical Lyapunov’s sense, but its performance may be sufficient for the practical point of view. For such situations, when the dynamic of systems contained within particular bounds during a fixed time interval, the researchers introduced the notion of practical stability [54,55,56,57]. Due to the great opportunities for applications, the notion has been considered for fractional-order systems [58,59]. For impulsive systems with FLDs, the concept has been investigated only in the paper [52]. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, practical stability results have not been derived for impulsive fractional-like neural network systems. In addition, we will consider the practical stability properties of the designed neural network model with FLDs with respect to manifolds [60,61,62]. Thus, our results are more general than stability (practical stability) results for single solutions: zero solutions, equilibrium, periodic solutions, etc. The case when the behavior of the neural network is affected by some uncertain parameters will also be discussed. Indeed, considering parameters with uncertain values is very important for its qualitative properties [63,64,65]. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some main definitions and lemmas on generalized FLDs and integrals are presented. We propose a design of an impulsive neural network model with generalized FLDs in Section 3. Some preliminaries are also given. In Section 4, we apply the elaborated in [52] definition of FLDs of piecewise continuous Lyapunov-type functions to derive sufficient conditions for practical stability with respect to manifolds defined by functions. The obtained results are also applied to an impulsive Hopfield fractional-like BAM neural network. In addition, two examples are also presented. Section 5 is devoted to practical stability results for impulsive neural networks with FLDs and uncertain parameters. Finally, the paper concludes in Section 6.

2. Generalized FLDs and Integrals

In this Section, we will state some main definitions and lemmas following [51,52,53]. Let , be the n-dimensional Euclidean space, and let be a bounded domain that contains the origin. For given and , we will consider a generalized order fractional-like derivative for a function defined as [52] Let , and . According to [51,52,53]: if , then has the form which has been applied in systems without impulsive perturbations [36,37,38,39,46,47,48,49,50]; if , then has the form if for some , then has the form If the generalized fractional-like derivative of order q of a continuous function exists at any point of an open interval of the type for some , , , then we will say that the function is q-differentiable on . The class of all q-differentiable on functions will be denoted by . Analogous to above, the generalized fractional-like integral of order with a lower limit , of a function is defined by (see [52]) Throughout this paper, we will use the following properties of the generalized FLDs , for some [52]. Let where Let the function For more results on FLDs and integrals we refer the reader to [

3. Impulsive Fractional-Like Neural Networks: Main Notions and Definitions

In this paper, we consider the next system of impulsive Hopfield fractional-like neural networks defined as where , , , , , , , , , , , . In the above impulsive fractional-like neural network model, represents the state of the th node at time t, n corresponds to the number of neurons in the neural network, the positive functions are, respectively, the capacitance and the resistance for the node i at time t, are the connection weights, denotes the activation function which determines the output of the jth unit at time t, denotes the external bias of the node i at time t, and , are the moments of impulsive perturbations and satisfy , . The numbers and are, respectively, the states of the ith node before and after an impulse perturbation at the moment and the functions represent the magnitudes of the impulsive changes of the states at the impulsive moments . The designed impulsive fractional-like neural network model generalizes many existing integer-order neural networks [ Let . We will denote by the solution of the fractional-like impulsive neural network system (1) that satisfies the initial condition Following the theory of impulsive fractional-order neural network systems [27,30], and the new theory of impulsive fractional-like systems [51,52,53], the solutions of the neural network models (1) are piecewise continuous functions that have points of discontinuity of the first kind and are left continuous at these moments. For such functions, the following identities are satisfied: All of these piecewise continuous functions formed the space . Let be a continuous function. The next sets will be called defined by the function h: To guarantee that the solution of the initial value problem (IVP) (1)–(2) exists on , and for the future investigations we will need the following assumptions. A1. The function h is continuous on and the sets , are -dimensional manifolds in . A2. Each solution of the IVP (1)-(2) satisfying is defined on the interval , . A3. There exist constants such that for all . In this paper we will use the following definition for practical exponential stability of the neural network system (1) with respect to manifolds defined by the function h given in [51]. The fractional-like impulsive system (1) is: (a) where (b) The problems of exponential stability of integer-order neural networks have been investigated by numerous authors [

4. Practical Stability of Impulsive Fractional-Like Neural Networks

4.1. Main Practical Stability Results

In this Section, we will state our main practical exponential stability results. Since we consider impulsive effects in the designed neural network model, we will use the following sets and piecewise continuous auxiliary functions [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,26,27,28,29,30,52]. What follows is the definition of the class of Lyapunov-like functions defined in [52] for any , . The function V is defined on G, V has non-negative values and V is continuous in G, For each and For a function , , we define its the upper right fractional-like derivative as [52]: Let for simplicity denote by , where Then [46,52] the fractional-like derivative of the function with respect to the solution of the IVP (1)–(2) is defined by If , V is differentiable on x, and is q-differentiable on t for , then where is a partial derivative of the function V. From (3) and (4) it follows , . We will also need the following result from [52]. Assume that the function where Then where In what follows, for a bounded continuous function f defined on , we set Assume that 1. Assumptions A1–A3 hold. 2. The models’ parameters and 3. For 4. The functions and 5. The function where Then the neural network system (1) is Let be a solution of (1) for . Consider the Lyapunov-like function We can easily check that . For , , from condition 4 of Theorem 1 we have that implies for , and From A3 for , , we get where From condition 2 of Theorem 1, it follows that there exits a real number such that and for , , along (1) we obtain From the last inequality, (5) and Lemma 1 we get Let , i.e., . Then from condition 3 of Theorem 3 it follows that can choose A so that . From (7) and condition 5 of Theorem 1 we obtain Therefore, for , i.e., the system (1) is -practically exponentially stable with respect to the function h. □ If the assumptions of Theorem 1 hold globally on Theorem 1 offers sufficient conditions for practical exponential stability (global practical exponential stability) with respect to a function h for the designed fractional-like impulsive neural network model. Exponential stability results for single solutions of the model (1) (equilibrium, zero solution, periodic solution) can be obtained as corollaries for particular choices of the function h. For example, in the case when Our results also complement the existing Mittag–Leffler stability results for fractional neural networks [ The new exponential stability results proved in Theorem 1 can be useful for various classes of fractional-like neural network models. Next, we will apply the obtained criteria to study the practical stability properties of following system of impulsive Hopfield fractional-like bidirectional associative memory (BAM) neural networks: where , , , , and correspond to the states of the ith unit and jth unit, respectively, at time t, , are positive constants, the real constants , are the connection weights, are the activation functions; denote external inputs at time t, and the constants , determine the abrupt changes of the states at the impulsive moments . Note that different types of BAM neural networks of integer order have been intensively investigated due to the great opportunities for their application in many fields such as pattern recognition and automatic control [11,12]. Results on fractional BAM neural network models with Caputo fractional derivatives have been also published in the recent literature. See, for example [27] and the references therein. In this Section, we will extend the existing results to the fractional-like case. Let and , . Denote by the solution of system (8) satisfying the initial conditions: We introduce the following conditions: A4. There exist constants and such that for all . A5. The constants and are such that for . The next result follows directly from Theorem 1. Assume that 1. Assumptions A1, A2, A4, A5 hold. 2. For and 3. For 4. For the function where Then (8) is The proof of Theorem 2 follows the steps in the proof of Theorem 1. In this case we can use the Lyapunov’s function Then, inequalities in the form (5) follow from the condition A5 and instead of (7), from condition 1 of Theorem 2, we get Condition 2 of Theorem 2 implies the existence of a positive number such that and, hence The proof is completed by applying conditions 3 and 4 of Theorem 2. □ Consider the following 2-D impulsive fractional-like Hopfield neural network model where Since then condition 2 of Theorem 1 is satisfied and Also, for In addition, conditions 4 of Theorem 1 is satisfied, since Therefore, according to Theorem 1, the impulsive fractional-like neural network system (9) is Consider the following impulsive BAM fractional-like Hopfield neural network model where and We can easily find that the neural network system (10) has an equilibrium Set For the system (12) all conditions of Theorem 2 are satisfied. Indeed, we have that for Hence, the fractional-like impulsive BAM neural network system (10) is

5. Impulsive Fractional-Like Neural Networks with Uncertain Parameters

In this Section, we will consider an impulsive neural network system with FLDs and uncertain parameters given by where the functions , , and constants , represent the uncertainty of the system [63]. In the case when all of these functions and constants are zeros the system (13) will be reduced to the “nominal system” (1). [63,64,65]. The system (1) is called Using Theorem 1, we can prove the next result. Assume that: 1. Conditions of Theorem 1 hold. 2. For and 3. The unknown constants Then the system (1) is Consider the following 2-D uncertain impulsive fractional-like Hopfield neural network model where Then we have that, if all uncertain terms are bounded, and satisfied all conditions of Theorem 3, the system (9) is Note that, if some of the uncertain terms is unbounded, Theorem 3 cannot guarantee the robust practical stability of the fractional-like model (9). For example, for

6. Conclusions

In this paper a new class of impulsive neural network systems with FLDs has been proposed. Practical stability analysis is performed and efficient sufficient conditions are established. With this research we extend the results on impulsive neural network Hopfield-type models to the fractional-like case. In addition, the obtained results are applied to neural networks with uncertain valued of parameters. Since the use of FLDs overcome some difficulties in evaluating fractional derivatives the obtained results are more appropriate for applications.
  7 in total

1.  Global Mittag-Leffler stability analysis of fractional-order impulsive neural networks with one-side Lipschitz condition.

Authors:  Xinxin Zhang; Peifeng Niu; Yunpeng Ma; Yanqiao Wei; Guoqiang Li
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2017-07-06

2.  Pinning-controlled synchronization of delayed neural networks with distributed-delay coupling via impulsive control.

Authors:  Wangli He; Feng Qian; Jinde Cao
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2016-10-03

3.  Multistability of Delayed Hybrid Impulsive Neural Networks With Application to Associative Memories.

Authors:  Bin Hu; Zhi-Hong Guan; Guanrong Chen; Frank L Lewis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 10.451

4.  LMI Conditions for Global Stability of Fractional-Order Neural Networks.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Yongguang Yu; Junzhi Yu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 10.451

5.  Practical stability analysis of fractional-order impulsive control systems.

Authors:  Ivanka Stamova; Johnny Henderson
Journal:  ISA Trans       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.468

6.  Mittag-Leffler synchronization of fractional neural networks with time-varying delays and reaction-diffusion terms using impulsive and linear controllers.

Authors:  Ivanka Stamova; Gani Stamov
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2017-09-08

7.  Noninstantaneous impulsive inequalities via conformable fractional calculus.

Authors:  Surang Sitho; Sotiris K Ntouyas; Praveen Agarwal; Jessada Tariboon
Journal:  J Inequal Appl       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.491

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.