| Literature DB >> 33285942 |
Federico Vázquez1, Péter Ván2,3,4, Róbert Kovács2,3,4.
Abstract
There has been much interest in semiconductor superlattices because of their low thermal conductivities. This makes them especially suitable for applications in a variety of devices for the thermoelectric generation of energy, heat control at the nanometric length scale, etc. Recent experiments have confirmed that the effective thermal conductivity of superlattices at room temperature have a minimum for very short periods (in the order of nanometers) as some kinetic calculations had anticipated previously. This work will show advances on a thermodynamic theory of heat transport in nanometric 1D multilayer systems by considering the separation of ballistic and diffusive heat fluxes, which are both described by Guyer-Krumhansl constitutive equations. The dispersion relations, as derived from the ballistic and diffusive heat transport equations, are used to derive an effective heat conductivity of the superlattice and to explain the minimum of the effective thermal conductivity.Entities:
Keywords: ballistic-diffusive heat transport; minimum effective thermal conductivity; semiconductor superlattices at room temperature
Year: 2020 PMID: 33285942 PMCID: PMC7516587 DOI: 10.3390/e22020167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Entropy (Basel) ISSN: 1099-4300 Impact factor: 2.524
Figure 1Dependence of the non-dimensional parameter (the ratio of the mean attenuation times of heat carriers) with respect the period thickness of the superlattice.
Figure 2Total effective thermal conductivity of the superlattice vs. period thickness given by Equation (20) with Equations (21) and (22). The model predicts the experimentally found minimum around a period thickness of 4 nm as well as the saturation for higher values of the thickness. Black solid line: theoretical values; blue dots: experimental values from Saha et al. [2]. .
Figure 3Power spectrum of temperature fluctuations in the diffusive regime. = 0.39/nm (green line) to = 1.2/nm (brown line) with a period 13.91 nm. The presence of two maxima in the power spectrum for 0.39/nm < < 1.2/nm reveals that two heat waves travel in opposite directions through the superlattice. For wave numbers below 0.39 and above 1.2/nm heat propagates diffusively.
Figure 4Heat carriers are propagated wavely when the wave number is between the two blue points for each value of the period thickness.
Figure 5Diffusive mean attenuation length as a function of the period thickness for different frequencies (Blue: 100 Hz, Orange: 3 Hz, Green: 1.2 Hz and Red: 1 Hz). The mean attenuation length was calculated from the imaginary part of the wave number as derived from Equation (14). Equation (24) was used for the parameter with the same constants and used for fitting the total effective thermal conductivity to the experimental data in Figure 2.
Figure 6Effective thermal conductivity of the superlattice vs. period thickness from Lebon et al. model [22]. This model does not predict the experimentally found minimum. Black solid line: theoretical values; blue dots: experimental values from Saha et al. [2].
Figure 7Effective thermal conductivity of the superlattice vs. period thickness according with the high order dissipative fluxes formulation of extended irreversible thermodynamics. This model does not predict the experimentally found minimum. Black solid line: theoretical values; blue dots: experimental values from Saha et al. [2].