BACKGROUND: Research on socio-ecological factors that may impede or facilitate access to naloxone in pharmacies remains limited. This study investigated associations between socio-ecological factors, pharmacy participation in the naloxone cost assistance program (NCAP), pharmacy characteristics and having naloxone in stock among pharmacies in New York City. METHODS: Phone interviews were conducted with 662 pharmacies selected from the New York City Naloxone Standing Order List. Multi-level generalized linear modeling estimated associations between neighborhood racial and ethnic composition, poverty rates, overdose fatality rates, pharmacy participation in N-CAP, having private physical spaces within the pharmacy, knowledge of where to refer people to obtain naloxone and adjusted relative risk (aRR) that the pharmacy would have naloxone in stock. RESULTS: Findings from this study supported several of the hypotheses. Greater neighborhood poverty was associated with a lower likelihood of carrying naloxone compared to neighborhoods with less poverty (aRR = .79, CI95 % = .69, .90, p < .001). Pharmacies that provided a private window for consultations (aRR = 1.34, CI95 % = 1.19, 1.51, p < .001), a private room (aRR = 1.42, CI95 % = 1.30, 1.56, p < .001), and a private area (aRR = 1.42, CI95 % = 1.30, 1.56, p < .001) were associated with a higher likelihood of carrying naloxone compared than those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that community-level socioeconomic marginalization is a contributor to disparities in naloxone availability among pharmacies in New York City. Findings support harm reduction interventions tailored to the built environment of pharmacies that respect privacy to those seeking naloxone.
BACKGROUND: Research on socio-ecological factors that may impede or facilitate access to naloxone in pharmacies remains limited. This study investigated associations between socio-ecological factors, pharmacy participation in the naloxone cost assistance program (NCAP), pharmacy characteristics and having naloxone in stock among pharmacies in New York City. METHODS: Phone interviews were conducted with 662 pharmacies selected from the New York City Naloxone Standing Order List. Multi-level generalized linear modeling estimated associations between neighborhood racial and ethnic composition, poverty rates, overdose fatality rates, pharmacy participation in N-CAP, having private physical spaces within the pharmacy, knowledge of where to refer people to obtain naloxone and adjusted relative risk (aRR) that the pharmacy would have naloxone in stock. RESULTS: Findings from this study supported several of the hypotheses. Greater neighborhood poverty was associated with a lower likelihood of carrying naloxone compared to neighborhoods with less poverty (aRR = .79, CI95 % = .69, .90, p < .001). Pharmacies that provided a private window for consultations (aRR = 1.34, CI95 % = 1.19, 1.51, p < .001), a private room (aRR = 1.42, CI95 % = 1.30, 1.56, p < .001), and a private area (aRR = 1.42, CI95 % = 1.30, 1.56, p < .001) were associated with a higher likelihood of carrying naloxone compared than those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that community-level socioeconomic marginalization is a contributor to disparities in naloxone availability among pharmacies in New York City. Findings support harm reduction interventions tailored to the built environment of pharmacies that respect privacy to those seeking naloxone.
Authors: Robin A Pollini; Jenny E Ozga; Rebecca Joyce; Ziming Xuan; Alexander Y Walley Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Scott G Weiner; Aleta D Carroll; Nicholas M Brisbon; Claudia P Rodriguez; Charles Covahey; Erin J Stringfellow; Catherine DiGennaro; Mohammad S Jalali; Sarah E Wakeman Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2022-04-30
Authors: Shayla Nolen; Xiao Zang; Avik Chatterjee; Czarina N Behrends; Traci C Green; Aranshi Kumar; Benjamin P Linas; Jake R Morgan; Sean M Murphy; Alexander Y Walley; Shapei Yan; Bruce R Schackman; Brandon D L Marshall Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-12-05 Impact factor: 7.256
Authors: Brandon D L Marshall; Nicole Alexander-Scott; Jesse L Yedinak; Benjamin D Hallowell; William C Goedel; Bennett Allen; Robert C Schell; Yu Li; Maxwell S Krieger; Claire Pratty; Jennifer Ahern; Daniel B Neill; Magdalena Cerdá Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 6.526