Gabriel de la Cruz-Ku1,2,3,4, Diego Chambergo-Michilot1,5, J Smith Torres-Roman1,4, Pamela Rebaza6, Joseph Pinto2, Jhajaira Araujo7, Zaida Morante8, Daniel Enriquez8, Claudio Flores2, Renato Luque1, Antonella Saavedra1, Maria Lujan1, Henry Gomez8, Bryan Valcarcel4. 1. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú. 2. Unidad de Investigación Básica y Translacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, Lima, Perú. 3. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America. 4. Latin American Network for Cancer Research (LAN-CANCER), Lima, Peru. 5. Department of Cardiology Research, Torres de Salud National Research Center, Lima, Peru. 6. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru. 7. Escuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Perú. 8. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a biomarker for predicting early-mortality (<2 years) among females with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). METHODS: We reviewed 118 medical records of females with mTNBC. The cut-off value for the NLR (<2.5 and ≥2.5) was determined with receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.85). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify the risk of mortality at two years. Moreover, we performed sensitivity analyses with different cut-off values and a subgroup analysis in females that only received chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24 months. Females with NLR ≥2.5 had a poor overall survival compared to females with NLR <2.5 (6% vs. 28%, p<0.001) at two years. This outcome remained when we stratified for females that only received chemotherapy (8% vs. 36%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified NLR ≥2.5 as a poor prognostic risk factor for mortality in the entire population (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.32-3.39) and among females that received chemotherapy (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.46-4.92). CONCLUSION: The NLR is an accessible and reliable biomarker that predicts early mortality among females with mTNBC. Our results suggest that females with high NLR values have poor prognosis despite receiving standard chemotherapy. Health providers should evaluate the possibility to enroll these patients in novel immunotherapy trials.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a biomarker for predicting early-mortality (<2 years) among females with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). METHODS: We reviewed 118 medical records of females with mTNBC. The cut-off value for the NLR (<2.5 and ≥2.5) was determined with receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.85). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify the risk of mortality at two years. Moreover, we performed sensitivity analyses with different cut-off values and a subgroup analysis in females that only received chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24 months. Females with NLR ≥2.5 had a poor overall survival compared to females with NLR <2.5 (6% vs. 28%, p<0.001) at two years. This outcome remained when we stratified for females that only received chemotherapy (8% vs. 36%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified NLR ≥2.5 as a poor prognostic risk factor for mortality in the entire population (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.32-3.39) and among females that received chemotherapy (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.46-4.92). CONCLUSION: The NLR is an accessible and reliable biomarker that predicts early mortality among females with mTNBC. Our results suggest that females with high NLR values have poor prognosis despite receiving standard chemotherapy. Health providers should evaluate the possibility to enroll these patients in novel immunotherapy trials.